RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many countries have their own hemodialysis (HD) quality assurance programs and star rating systems for HD facilities. However, the effects of HD quality assurance programs on patient mortality are not well understood. Therefore, in the present study, the effects of the Korean HD facility star rating on patient mortality in maintenance HD patients were evaluated. METHODS: This longitudinal, observational cohort study included 35,271 patients receiving HD treatment from 741 facilities. The fivestar ratings of HD facilities were determined based on HD quality assessment data from 2015, which includes 12 quality measures in structural, procedural, and outcome domains. The patients were grouped into high (three to five stars) and low (one or two stars) groups based on HD facility star rating. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effects of star rating on patient mortality during the mean follow-up duration of 3 years. RESULTS: The patient ratio between high and low HD facility star rating groups was 82.0% vs. 18.0%. The patients in the low star rating group showed lower single-pool Kt/V and higher calcium and phosphorus levels compared with subjects in the high star rating group. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical parameters, the HD facility star rating independently increased the mortality risk (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.18; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The HD facilities with low star rating showed higher patient mortality.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of patients requiring dialysis is increasing worldwide, and the atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) prevalence among hemodialysis (HD) patients is higher than in the general population. There have been no studies of Korean AF patients undergoing HD that investigated how AF affects outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, hospitalization, and stroke events. We conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study with data from the National Health Insurance System to determine how AF affects these outcomes. METHODS: In 2013, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, a Korean national health insurance scheme, collected data from 21,839 HD patients to evaluate the adequacy of dialysis centers. All-cause mortality, hospitalization, and stroke events were compared between patients with and without AF. Sub-analyses compared these outcomes between AF patients receiving warfarin and those not receiving warfarin. RESULTS: Cox regression analysis found that AF was a significant risk factor for death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.356; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.222-1.506; p < 0.001), hospitalization (HR, 1.323; 95% CI, 1.225-1.430; p < 0.001), and hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 1.500; 95% CI, 1.050-2.141; p = 0.026). AF was not significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. The use of warfarin was significantly associated with hemorrhagic stroke incidence (HR, 1.593; 95% CI, 1.075-2.360; p = 0.020), while there was no significant correlation between warfarin treatment and all-cause mortality, hospitalization, and ischemic stroke. CONCLUSION: This cohort study of Korean dialysis patients showed that AF was a risk factor for multiple outcomes among HD patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing incidence of hemodialysis (HD) due to old age and comorbid condition such as diabetes. In general, socioeconomic status (SES) is known as one of the most important risk factors for patient mortality and morbidity. Whether low SES is associated with poorer outcome in HD patients is controversial. This study was performed to evaluate the association of health insurance status as a proxy indicator for SES upon mortality and hospitalization in maintenance HD patients. METHODS: We used HD-quality assessment data from the year of 2015 for collecting demographic and clinical data. The subjects were classified into Medical Aid (MA) recipients (low SES) and National Health Insurance (NHI) beneficiary (high SES). We analyzed mortality and hospitalization risk based on health insurance status using Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 35,454 adult HD patients ≥18 years old who received HD treatment more than twice weekly were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The ratio between MA recipient and NHI beneficiary was 76.7 versus 23.3%. The MA recipient group demonstrated younger age and lower proportion of female, diabetes, hypertension, and cerebrovascular accidents compared to the NHI beneficiary group. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidity, and laboratory parameters, the MA recipient group showed a significantly higher mortality risk compared to the NHI beneficiary group (hazard ratio 1.073 [1.009-1.14], p = 0.025). The MA recipient group was also an independent risk factor for hospitalization after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (hazard ratio 1.142 [1.108-1.178], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low SES as measured by health insurance status was associated with an increased risk of patient mortality and hospitalization in Korean maintenance HD patients.