RESUMEN
To improve the efficacy over antiplatelet monotherapy, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been increasingly adopted in the management of non-cardioembolic stroke. For minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack, the aspirin-clopidogrel combination is now recommended for acute short-term treatment, whereas aspirin-ticagrelor combination may be considered in selected patients, especially those with resistance to clopidogrel. For long-term stroke prevention, aspirin-dipyridamole combination has been used as an alternative to antiplatelet monotherapy, and aspirin or clopidogrel combined with cilostazole may be prescribed for added protection in high-risk patients. In this paper, we review the development of DAPT from a historical perspective and describe the findings from major clinical trials published up until the end of 2023. Using the 2021 American Heart Association guideline for secondary stroke prevention as a basis for our recommendations, we further discuss areas of controversy and more recent developments to provide an updated review for clinicians to consider in their daily practice.
RESUMEN
Intracranial stenosis is prevalent among Asians and constitutes a common cause of cerebral ischemia. While the best medical therapy carries stroke recurrence rates in excess of 10% per year, trials with intracranial stenting have been associated with unacceptable peri-procedural ischemic events. Cerebral ischemic events are strongly related to the severity of intracranial stenosis, which is high in patients with severe intracranial stenosis with poor vasodilatory reserve. Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP) therapy is known to improve myocardial perfusion by facilitating the development of collateral blood vessels in the heart. In this randomized clinical trial, we evaluate whether EECP therapy may be useful in patients with severe stenosis of intracranial internal carotid (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA). The review of literature, methods of evaluation, status of currently used therapeutic approaches, and trial protocol have been presented. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03921827.
RESUMEN
Objective: Prior studies have shown that plaque inflammation on FDG-PET and the symptomatic carotid atheroma inflammation lumen-stenosis (SCAIL) score were associated with recurrent ischemic events, but the findings have thus far not been widely validated. Therefore, we aimed to validate the findings of prior studies. Methods: A single-center prospective cohort study that recruited patients with (1) recent TIA or ischemic stroke within the past 30 days, (2) ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis of ≥50%, and (3) were not considered for early carotid revascularization. The (1) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the symptomatic carotid plaque, (2) the SCAIL score, and (3) stenosis severity of the symptomatic carotid artery were measured for all patients. The outcomes were (1) a 90-day ipsilateral ischemic stroke and (2) a 90-day ipsilateral symptomatic TIA or major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Results: Among the 131 patients included in the study, the commonest cardiovascular risk factor was hypertension (95 patients, 72.5%), followed by diabetes mellitus (77 patients, 58.8%) and being a current smoker (64 patients, 48.9%). The median (IQR) duration between the index cerebral ischemic event and recruitment to the study was 1 (0, 2.5) days. The median (IQR) duration between the index cerebral ischemic event and FDG-PET was 5 (4, 7) days. A total of 14 (10.7%) patients had a 90-day stroke, and 41 (31.3%) patients had a 90-day TIA or MACE. On comparison of the predictive performances of the SCAIL score and SUVmax, SUVmax was found to be superior to the SCAIL score for predicting both 90-day ipsilateral ischemic stroke (AUC: SCAIL = 0.79, SUVmax = 0.92; p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.072, 0.229) and 90-day TIA or MACE (AUC: SCAIL = 0.76, SUVmax = 0.84; p = 0.009; 95% CI = 0.020, 0.143). Conclusion: Plaque inflammation as quantified on FDG-PET may serve as a reliable biomarker for risk stratification among patients with ECAD and recent TIA or ischemic stroke. Future studies should evaluate whether patients with significant plaque inflammation as quantified on FDG-PET benefit from carotid revascularization and/or anti-inflammatory therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant strain on front-line healthcare workers. AIMS: In this multicentre study, we compared the psychological outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in various countries in the Asia-Pacific region and identified factors associated with adverse psychological outcomes. METHOD: From 29 April to 4 June 2020, the study recruited healthcare workers from major healthcare institutions in five countries in the Asia-Pacific region. A self-administrated survey that collected information on prior medical conditions, presence of symptoms, and scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised were used. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) relating to COVID-19 was compared, and multivariable logistic regression identified independent factors associated with adverse psychological outcomes within each country. RESULTS: A total of 1146 participants from India, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam were studied. Despite having the lowest volume of cases, Vietnam displayed the highest prevalence of PTSD. In contrast, Singapore reported the highest case volume, but had a lower prevalence of depression and anxiety. In the multivariable analysis, we found that non-medically trained personnel, the presence of physical symptoms and presence of prior medical conditions were independent predictors across the participating countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that the varied prevalence of psychological adversity among healthcare workers is independent of the burden of COVID-19 cases within each country. Early psychological interventions may be beneficial for the vulnerable groups of healthcare workers with presence of physical symptoms, prior medical conditions and those who are not medically trained.
RESUMEN
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is rapidly evolving and affecting healthcare systems across the world. Singapore has escalated its alert level to Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) Orange, signifying severe disease with community spread. We aimed to study the overall volume of AIS cases and the delivery of hyperacute stroke services during DORSCON Orange. This was a single-centre, observational cohort study performed at a comprehensive stroke centre responsible for AIS cases in the western region of Singapore, as well as providing care for COVID-19 patients. All AIS patients reviewed as an acute stroke activation in the Emergency Department (ED) from November 2019 to April 2020 were included. System processes timings, treatment and clinical outcome variables were collected. We studied 350 AIS activation patients admitted through the ED, 206 (58.9%) pre- and 144 during DORSCON Orange. Across the study period, number of stroke activations showed significant decline (p = 0.004, 95% CI 6.513 to - 2.287), as the number of COVID-19 cases increased exponentially, whilst proportion of activations receiving acute recanalization therapy remained stable (p = 0.519, 95% CI - 1.605 to 2.702). Amongst AIS patients that received acute recanalization therapy, early neurological outcomes in terms of change in median NIHSS at 24 h (-4 versus -4, p = 0.685) were largely similar between the pre- and during DORSCON orange periods. The number of stroke activations decreased while the proportion receiving acute recanalization therapy remained stable in the current COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.
Asunto(s)
Atención Integral de Salud/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Recuperación de la Función , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Singapur/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
Intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), dose determined by patients' body-weight, remains the only approved drug treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since a shorter onset-to-treatment time results in better functional outcome, treatment is often initiated according to the estimated or last-known body-weight of the patient. This approach may result in underdosing or overdosing of tPA. In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the extent of error in tPA dosing in our AIS cohort and its impact on functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Consecutive AIS patients, receiving IV-tPA, dose determined by the estimated body-weight, at three tertiary centers between January and December 2017 were included. Collected data included information about demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke subtype and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Estimated and measured body-weights were recorded. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 2 or more defined unfavorable outcome. The study included 150 patients. Median age was 64 -years (IQR 55-75) with male preponderance (67%) and median NIHSS score of 9 points (IQR 6-17). Mean measured weight of our study population was 58 (SD 13) kg. Median difference between actual and estimated body-weight was 3 kg (IQR 1.5-6). Difference was more than 10% in 35 (23.3%) patients. Good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was achieved by 74 (49.3%) patients and 10 (6.8%) developed SICH. NIHSS (OR 1.288; 95% CI 1.157-1.435, p < 0.001) and large artery atherosclerosis (OR 5.878; 95% CI 1.929-17.910, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of unfavorable functional outcome. Our finding of the statistically insignificant 2.5-fold increase in poor outcomes among patients where the estimated and actual weight differed by more than 10% should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Significant difference occurs between estimated and actual body-weight in a considerable proportion of thrombolysed AIS patients. However, this discrepancy does not affect functional outcome or the risk of SICH.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Peso Corporal , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Since the declaration of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as pandemic, there are reports on the increased prevalence of physical symptoms observed in the general population. We investigated the association between psychological outcomes and physical symptoms among healthcare workers. METHODS: Healthcare workers from 5 major hospitals, involved in the care for COVID-19 patients, in Singapore and India were invited to participate in a study by performing a self-administered questionnaire within the period of February 19 to April 17, 2020. Healthcare workers included doctors, nurses, allied healthcare workers, administrators, clerical staff and maintenance workers. This questionnaire collected information on demographics, medical history, symptom prevalence in the past month, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) instrument. The prevalence of physical symptoms displayed by healthcare workers and the associations between physical symptoms and psychological outcomes of depression, anxiety, stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the 906 healthcare workers who participated in the survey, 48 (5.3%) screened positive for moderate to very-severe depression, 79 (8.7%) for moderate to extremely-severe anxiety, 20 (2.2%) for moderate to extremely-severe stress, and 34 (3.8%) for moderate to severe levels of psychological distress. The commonest reported symptom was headache (32.3%), with a large number of participants (33.4%) reporting more than four symptoms. Participants who had experienced symptoms in the preceding month were more likely to be older, have pre-existing comorbidities and a positive screen for depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD. After adjusting for age, gender and comorbidities, it was found that depression (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.54-5.07, p = 0.001), anxiety (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.36-3.48, p = 0.001), stress (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.27-7.41, p = 0.13), and PTSD (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.12-4.35, p = 0.023) remained significantly associated with the presence of physical symptoms experienced in the preceding month. Linear regression revealed that the presence of physical symptoms was associated with higher mean scores in the IES-R, DASS Anxiety, Stress and Depression subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a significant association between the prevalence of physical symptoms and psychological outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. We postulate that this association may be bi-directional, and that timely psychological interventions for healthcare workers with physical symptoms should be considered once an infection has been excluded.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Depresión/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Adulto , Técnicos Medios en Salud/psicología , Técnicos Medios en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Cefalea/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Internacionalidad , Letargia/epidemiología , Masculino , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Faringitis/epidemiología , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapur/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapur/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Uncertainty persists over the optimal management of blood pressure (BP) in the early phase of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aims to determine the safety and effects of intensive BP lowering on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and functional in AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 54 thrombolysed AIS patients with a systolic BP of 160 to 180âmmâHg will be randomized to early intensive BP lowering (systolic target range 140-160âmmâHg) or guideline-based BP management (systolic range 160-180âmmâHg) during first 72-hours using primarily intravenous labetalol. We hypothesize that early intensive BP lowering will not reduce CBF by 20% and/or increase the volume of hypoperfused tissue by >20% on computed tomographic perfusion. Clinical outcome will be assessed using a dichotomized modified Rankin scale (scores 0-1 as excellent outcome vs scores 2-6 as dead or dependent) at 90 days. Other outcome would be symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03443596. CONCLUSION: This randomized study will provide important information about the physiological effects of BP reduction on cerebral perfusion after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Labetalol/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos de Investigación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECT: Both the older and the recent extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass trials for symptomatic carotid occlusion failed to demonstrate a reduction in stroke recurrence. However, the role of superficial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenoocclusive disease has been rarely evaluated. The authors evaluated serial changes in various cerebral hemodynamic parameters in patients with severe stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) and impaired cerebral vasodilatory reserve (CVR), treated by STA-MCA bypass surgery or medical treatment. METHODS: Patients with severe stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial ICA or MCA underwent transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and CVR assessment using the breath-holding index (BHI). Patients with impaired BHI (< 0.69) were further evaluated with acetazolamide-challenge technitium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime ((99m)Tc HMPAO) SPECT. STA-MCA bypass surgery was offered to patients with impaired CVR on SPECT. All patients underwent TCD and SPECT at 4 ± 1 months and were followed up for cerebral ischemic events. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included. This total included 73 men, and the mean age of the entire study population was 56 years (range 23-78 years). (99m)Tc HMPAO SPECT demonstrated impaired CVR in 77 patients (69%). Of these 77 patients, 46 underwent STA-MCA bypass while 31 received best medical treatment. TCD and acetazolamide-challenge (99m)Tc HMPAO SPECT repeated at 4 ± 1 months showed significant improvement in the STA-MCA bypass group. During a mean follow-up of 34 months (range 18-39 months), only 6 (13%) of 46 patients in the bypass group developed cerebral ischemic events, as compared with 14 (45%) of 31 patients receiving medical therapy (absolute risk reduction 32%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: STA-MCA bypass surgery in carefully selected patients with symptomatic severe intracranial stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial ICA or MCA results in significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters and reduction in stroke recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Revascularización Cerebral/métodos , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Enfermedades Arteriales Intracraneales/cirugía , Arteria Cerebral Media/cirugía , Arterias Temporales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Arteriales Intracraneales/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Cerebral Media/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The primary aim of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke is recanalization of an occluded intracranial artery. Recanalization is an important predictor of stroke outcome as timely restoration of regional cerebral perfusion helps salvage threatened ischemic tissue. At present, intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA) remains the only FDA-approved therapeutic agent for the treatment of ischemic stroke within 3 hours of symptom onset. Recent studies have demonstrated safety as well as efficacy of IV-TPA even in an extended therapeutic window. However, the short therapeutic window, low rates of recanalization, and only modest benefits with IV-TPA have prompted a quest for alternative approaches to restore blood flow in an occluded artery in acute ischemic stroke. Although intra-arterial delivery of the thrombolytic agent seems effective, various logistic constraints limit its routine use and as yet no lytic agent have not received full regulatory approval for intra-arterial therapy. Mechanical devices and approaches can achieve higher rates of recanalization but their safety and efficacy still need to be established in larger clinical trials. The field of acute revascularization is rapidly evolving, and various combinations of pharmacologic agents, mechanical devices, and novel microbubble/ultrasound technologies are being tested in multiple clinical trials.
RESUMEN
Treatment rates with intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (IS) remain low in Asian populations. Various logistic obstacles and higher anticipated bleeding risk in Asians are major concerns. We report on the feasibility and safety of IV-tPA therapy at our tertiary care center. Consecutive acute IS patients eligible for thrombolysis were treated with low-dose (maximum 50 mg) IV-tPA between January 2000 and September 2006 and with standard-dose (maximum 90 mg) IV-tPA between October 2006 and May 2008. The efficacy of IV-tPA was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months and by absolute changes in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at hospital discharge and 3 months. The safety of IV-tPA was assessed by the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). A total of 130 patients were included (mean age, 60±13 years; 60% males; median NIHSS score, 14). A total of 48 patients received low-dose IV-tPA, and 82 patients received standard-dose IV-tPA. The median onset to treatment time was 160 minutes. Some 59% of the patients achieved functional independence (mRS score 0-1) at 3 months with standard-dose tPA, compared with 35% in the low-dose group (P=.011). SICH occurred more frequently with the low dose (14.5%) than with the standard dose (1.2%; P=.004). In a multivariate logistic regression model, lower admission NIHSS score (odds ratio [OR]=0.78 per 1-point increase; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.70-0.88), lower pretreatment blood glucose level (OR=0.76 per 1 mmol/L increase; 95% CI=0.60-0.95), shorter time from symptom onset to IV-tPA bolus (OR=0.97 per 1-minute increase; 95% CI=0.94-1.0), and standard-dose IV-tPA (OR=12.49; 95% CI=2.9-53.89) were associated with a higher likelihood for functional independence at 3 months. Our data indicate that standard-dose IV-tPA (0.9 mg/kg) was feasible and safe for treating acute IS in our multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.