Postponement of total knee arthroplasties due to pandemic causes significant deterioration on patients' preoperative knee and quality of life scores.

Introduction: Elective surgeries were postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate healthcare strains, affecting majority of elective orthopaedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on knee function and quality of life of patients who had their planned TKA postponed due to the pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data collected in a tertiary hospital. Patients included were diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis and they were initially scheduled for primary TKA between January to April 2020 but surgery was postponed by at least 6 months from the initial operative date. 160 patients were included in this study (53 males and 107 females, mean age 68.0 ± 8.1). Patients were assessed prior to initial surgery date and assessed again, prior to the postponed surgery date. Clinical scores included Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component Scores. (SF36 PCS and MCS). Paired T-test was performed for parametric data whereas Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis was performed for non-parametric data. Results: Comparing initial preoperative versus postponement preoperative scores, the cohort had significantly poorer KSKS (38.4 ± 15.4 and 36.5 ± 15.4, p = 0.034), SF36 PCS (34.3 ± 9.2 and 32.7 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) and OKS (34.9 ± 0.77 and 35.8 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) scores respectively. Conclusion: The postponement of elective TKAs has resulted in a significant deterioration of knee scores and physical quality of live scores of patients in a short span of 6 months. Further studies can evaluate if there are repercussions on long term TKAs outcomes. Level of evidence: Retrospective study, Level III.

A Longer Duration of Myelopathy Symptoms is Associated With the Lack of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Improvement During Decompressive Cervical Myelopathy Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: We aim to investigate the relationship between the intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) signal changes during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy with postoperative functional outcomes and determine what factors correlate with MEP signal changes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring with MEP for cervical cord decompression can potentially predict postoperative neurological complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 114 consecutive cervical compressive myelopathy patients who underwent decompressive cervical spine surgery. Functional outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the 6-month mark, using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score. RESULTS: Among the 114 patients, 87 patients showed significant MEP improvement, 1 patient with MEP degeneration, 3 patients with no change in MEP, and 23 patients with MEP change, but which eventually returned to baseline. Univariate analysis showed that patients with MEP improvement had similar 6-month functional and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores compared with patients who did not have MEP improvement. Critically, a longer duration of symptoms was shown to have a statistically significant relationship with patients who did not have MEP improvement on univariate analysis (49.2 wk in patients with no MEP improvement compared with 34.59 wk in patients with MEP improvement, P = 0.03) but this did not translate to differences in functional outcomes. There was also no statistically significant association between the functional outcome scores and demographics, surgical, or radiologic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the duration of symptoms is not attributed to lower functional outcomes but is associated with a lack of MEP improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

No differences in 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with different mediolateral femoral component positions in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There has been a paucity of literature evaluating the role of mediolateral femoral component position (FCP) in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA). Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the mediolateral FCP in UKA will affect the 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients who underwent medial UKA. METHODS: Data of 262 patients who underwent medial UKA were analyzed. All patients were assessed at 6 months, 2 years and 10 years using the Knee Society Function Score, Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 Physical/Mental Component Scores and postoperative satisfaction. The mediolateral FCP on postoperative radiographs was measured by independent assessors using the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. 144 patients were distributed into group C (center), 98 into group M (medial) and 20 into group L (lateral) according to FCP, and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the functional outcomes of the three groups. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between the three groups in terms of 10-year clinical outcomes, quality of life, satisfaction rates and revision rates. CONCLUSION: Differences in mediolateral FCP did not result in significant difference in 10-year postoperative clinical outcomes for patients who underwent fixed-bearing medial UKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level III.

Improvements in functional outcome and quality of life are not sustainable for patients ≥ 68 years old 10 years after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to evaluate whether improvements in functional outcome and quality of life are sustainable 10 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the age cut-off for clinical deterioration in outcomes METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data of 120 consecutive patients who underwent TKA at a tertiary hospital in 2006 was analysed. All patients were assessed at 6 months, 2 years and 10 years using the Knee Society Function Score, Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 Physical/Mental Component Scores and postoperative satisfaction. One-way ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables, while Chi-squared test to compare categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive factors associated with deterioration of scores postoperatively. RESULTS: Significant improvements were noted in all functional outcome and quality of life scores at 6 months after TKA. Between 6 months and 2 years, the KSFS and OKS continued to improve but the KSKS, PCS and MCS plateaued. Between 2 and 10 years, there was a deterioration in the KSFS and OKS, whilst KSKS, PCS and MCS were maintained. Increasing age was noted to be a significant risk factor for deterioration of KSFS at 10 years with age ≥ 68 as the cut-off value. 91.7% of patients with KSFS Minimally Clinically Important Difference(MCID) (≥ 7 points) continued to be satisfied after 10 years compared to 100.0% who did not experience KSFS MCID deterioration (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients ≥ 68 years experience deterioration in functional outcomes and quality of life from 2 to 10 years after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level III.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Broström-Gould Repair for Chronic Ankle Instability.

BACKGROUND: The open Broström-Gould procedure for the repair of lateral ankle ligament remains the gold standard in operative management of chronic ankle instability. Nevertheless, the arthroscopic technique has been gaining attention among foot and ankle surgeons in the past decade. Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent the arthroscopic and open Brostom-Gould technique over a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry from 2015 to 2019. We then performed a 1:1 matching of 26 ankles that underwent the arthroscopic Broström-Gould technique to 26 ankles with the open technique, all performed by a fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon, for age, sex, and body mass index. To assess clinical outcomes, visual analog scale scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores, and Short Form 36 Health Survey scores were collected at the preoperative and 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. RESULTS: The arthroscopic group demonstrated significantly less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic, 1.0 ± 1.2; open, 2.4 ± 2.2; P = .015) and had higher AOFAS scores at 6 months (arthroscopic, 87.2 ± 11.1; open, 73.5 ± 21.9; P = .028) and 12 months (arthroscopic, 94.2 ± 10.0; open, 70.9 ± 33.1; P = .020). No complications were reported in either group. Twenty patients (76.9%) in the arthroscopic group had preoperative intra-articular abnormalities compared with 24 patients (92.3%) in the open group. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic Broström-Gould technique produced better clinical outcomes than the open technique at 12 months of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup. METHODS: From 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6months and 24months after surgery. RESULTS: The arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9±1.2, open: 3.8±1.1, p<0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1±0.7 open: 3.5±1.7, p<0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6months (arthroscopic: 58.4±27.1, open: 47.1±24.0, p<0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9±18.9, open: 68.9±24.7, p<0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.