Pediatrician-Authored Opinion/Editorial Articles Published in Newspapers Before and After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians publish opinion/editorials in newspapers as a form of advocacy. No research has characterized these publications to determine the scope of this communication. OBJECTIVE: We examined the characteristics of pediatrician-authored op-eds, comparing articles published in a seasonally matched six-month period before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed 249 pediatrician-authored op-eds (109 before COVID-19; 140 during COVID-19 pandemic) over two six-month periods accessed through America's Newspapers database in June 2021. Each article was coded for topics covered, presumed motivations for the publication, and communication techniques used. RESULTS: Total number of articles published by pediatricians was higher after the start of COVID-19 compared with a period before the pandemic. Authors commonly asked for legislative action before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, but within the COVID-19 pandemic authors more often asked for behavioral changes in the readers themselves. Personal stories were a common technique used in both time periods; shaming of government became more common during COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide context for additional studies examining the usefulness of op-eds in pediatrician advocacy.

Self-Perception of HIV Risk and Interest in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a General Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Population.

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized, particularly among attendees of obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clinics. Lack of self-perception of HIV risk is a barrier to PrEP utilization, and a lack of understanding of community risk factors for HIV may contribute to that lack of self-perception of risk. Methods: Attendees of general Ob/Gyn clinics in New Orleans completed a survey assessing HIV knowledge, self-perception of HIV risk, and interest in PrEP. They reviewed a brief written educational intervention on demographic and behavioral risk factors for HIV and availability of PrEP. HIV knowledge, self-perception of HIV risk, and interest in PrEP were reassessed after the intervention. Results: One-hundred seventy individuals completed the survey. Eighty-five participants (50%) expressed initial interest in PrEP. Self-perception of risk of HIV acquisition was associated with interest in PrEP. Ten of 11 (90.9%) respondents who had high self-perceived risk of HIV were interested in PrEP, compared with 75 of 159 (47.2%) of those who had low self-perceived risk (p = 0.01). The association remained significant in a multivariate analysis. After the intervention, the number of those who perceived themselves to be at risk of HIV increased from 11 to 25 individuals (p < 0.01) and 20 of these (80%) were interested in PrEP. Knowledge of HIV risk factors increased (p < 0.01). The intervention did not significantly alter interest in PrEP. Conclusions: Self-perception of HIV risk was associated with interest in PrEP. A brief written educational intervention increased knowledge of HIV risk factors and increased self-perception of risk of HIV. The intervention did not translate to increased interest in PrEP.

Social distancing and mental health among pregnant women during the coronavirus pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The effect of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of pregnant women is of particular concern, given potential effects on physical health, family functioning, and child development. METHODS: Pregnant women were recruited for the "Implications of and Experiences Surrounding being Pregnant during the COVID-19 Pandemic" study at Woman's Hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Participants enrolled at any point during their pregnancy and surveys were delivered weekly until the participant indicated that she had delivered her baby; a postpartum survey followed four weeks after delivery. This analysis includes 1037 participants with baseline, 596 with follow-up, and 302 with postpartum surveys. Questions on social distancing behaviors were asked at baseline and grouped based on whether they involved social distancing from work, friends and family, or public places. Symptoms of anxiety, stress, depression, and pregnancy-related anxiety were measured. Each type of social distancing was examined as a predictor of mental health using linear model with control for confounders. RESULTS: The study population was largely white (84.1%), married (81.8%), and educated (76.2% with a bachelor's or higher degree). Women who were younger, Black, unmarried, or had less education or income reported fewer social distancing behaviors. Mean anxiety score in the highest quartile of overall social distancing was 8.3 (SD 5.6), while in the lowest quartile it was 6.0 (SD 5.0) (p < 0.01), while perceived stress postpartum and pregnancy-related stress were not associated with social distancing. Associations were substantially diminished when controlled for baseline levels of anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Greater social distancing was associated with more anxiety symptoms, but worse mental health, particularly anxiety, may also have contributed to greater social distancing behaviors.