Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(3): 116309, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had profound global impacts on daily lives, economic stability, and healthcare systems. Diagnosis of COVID-19 infection via RT-PCR was crucial in reducing spread of disease and informing treatment management. While RT-PCR is a key diagnostic test, there is room for improvement in the development of diagnostic criteria. Identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath provides a fast, reliable, and economically favorable alternative for disease detection. METHODS: This meta-analysis analyzed the diagnostic performance of VOC-based breath analysis in detection of COVID-19 infection. A systematic review of twenty-nine papers using the grading criteria from Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and PRISMA guidelines was conducted. RESULTS: The cumulative results showed a sensitivity of 0.92 (95 % CI, 90 %-95 %) and a specificity of 0.90 (95 % CI 87 %-93 %). Subgroup analysis by variant demonstrated strong sensitivity to the original strain compared to the Omicron and Delta variant in detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. An additional subgroup analysis of detection methods showed eNose technology had the highest sensitivity when compared to GC-MS, GC-IMS, and high sensitivity-MS. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results support the use of breath analysis as a new detection method of COVID-19 infection.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...