Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: effects on survival and quality of life.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We describe the two largest reported, randomized, parallel trials designed to determine whether the addition of chemotherapy influences duration and quality of life in localized, unresectable (mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin [MIC]1 trial) and extensive (MIC2 trial) disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ambulatory patients with NSCLC, aged 75 years or younger, with localized disease, were randomized in MIC1 to receive up to four cycles of chemotherapy (CT: mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3 g/m(2), and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2)) every 21 days, followed by radical radiotherapy (CT + RT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. Extensive-stage patients were randomized in MIC2 to identical chemotherapy plus palliative care (CT + PC) or palliative care (PC) alone. Short-term change in quality of life (QOL) was assessed in a subgroup of patients. Data from the two trials were combined to allow multivariate and stratified survival analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-seven eligible patients were randomized, 446 in MIC1 and 351 in MIC2. MIC CT improved survival in both trials (significantly in MIC2). The median survival time in MIC1 was 11.7 months (CT + RT) versus 9.7 months (RT alone) (P =.14); whereas in MIC2, median survival time was 6.7 months (CT + PC) compared with 4. 8 months (PC alone) (P =.03). QOL, assessed in 134 patients from start of trial to week 6, showed improvement with chemotherapy and deterioration with standard treatment. In the combined analysis of 797 randomized patients, the positive effect of MIC on survival was significant overall (P =.01) and after adjusting for prognostic factors (P =.01). CONCLUSION: MIC chemotherapy prolongs survival in unresectable NSCLC without compromising QOL.

Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomised multi-centre trial of weekly chemotherapy (CAPOMEt) versus cyclical chemotherapy (CHOP-Mtx) in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Central Lymphoma Group.

BACKGROUND: Weekly alternating regimen known as CAPOMEt is compared to standard cyclical chemotherapy (CHOP-Mtx) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-one patients with aggressive NHL were randomised to receive either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and methotrexate (CHOP-Mtx) on a cyclical basis or a weekly regimen incorporating the same drugs with the addition of etoposide (CAPOMEt). RESULTS: After pathological review, 281 patients were deemed eligible. At the census date of 31 March 1994, 158 patients were alive with a median follow up of 5.9 years (minimum 3.0 years). Analysis of all patients and eligible patients showed no significant treatment differences in the rates of complete remission (CR), failure free survival (FFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two arms. The actuarial median OS was 24 months for CAPOMEt compared with 31 months for CHOP-Mtx, with five-year actuarial survival rates of 37% and 43%, respectively. Myelosuppression was significantly more severe with CHOP-Mtx and neurotoxicity was much more common with CAPOMEt. CONCLUSION: Weekly CAPOMEt is equally effective as standard cyclical CHOP-Mtx treatment in aggressive NHL.

Management preferences in stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis: an investigation among patients, controls and oncologists.

Increasingly, treatment choices leading to the same survival outcome can be offered to cancer patients (e.g. mastectomy or conservative surgery in early breast cancer). Two approaches available for post-orchidectomy, stage I patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis (NSGCTT), particularly those at high risk of relapse, include immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (two courses) or surveillance, with chemotherapy (typically four courses) given only on relapse. The aim of this study was to investigate which approach patients prefer. Questionnaires were given to newly diagnosed NSGCTT patients, to patients with previous experience of the two options and to non-cancer controls, including specialist testicular tumour oncologists. Participants were asked to choose between immediate chemotherapy, surveillance or for the doctor to decide, at recurrence risk levels ranging from 10% to 90%. Questionnaires were returned by 207 subjects in nine different groups. The risk thresholds at which subjects' management preference changed, within apparently homogeneous groups, varied greatly, although at least one subject in each group selected adjuvant chemotherapy at the lowest (10%) level of risk. Subjects tended to favour options of which they had previous experience. Cancer patients wanted the doctor to decide more frequently than controls. The wide variability observed makes it difficult to predict which option an individual will select. Personality factors and personal circumstances, other than specific experience and knowledge, are obviously influential. Many patients would prefer their doctor to decide, but variability among oncologists is as great as that among their patients.

A case of spontaneous regression of metastatic testicular teratoma.

We report the apparently spontaneous regression of metastatic disease in a young man who had previously undergone orchidectomy for a primary testicular teratoma. Serial serum tumour marker estimations revealed a sharp rise followed by a spontaneous decline in levels in a patient who had requested that chemotherapy be deferred for personal reasons.

Quality of life after treatment for testicular cancer--the patient's view.

Twenty-eight patients cured of testicular cancer by cisplatin-based chemotherapy were asked for their own views of the long-term psychological and social effects of their treatment. Their views were compared with a group of 34 testicular cancer patients cured by radiotherapy who were matched for age, social class and time since treatment. A category rating type questionnaire was used with questions concerning general health, subjective side-effects of treatment, employment, relationships, reproduction and mood. The principal differences were (1) the chemotherapy group reported a greater prevalence of physical side-effects, (2) the radiotherapy group reported greater anxiety and depression since treatment and (3) a significant number of patients in the chemotherapy group felt that their illness had had beneficial effects on their relationships with family and friends.

Long-term toxicity of chemotherapy for testicular cancer--the cost of cure.

Twenty-seven patients cured of advanced testicular cancer by cisplatin-based chemotherapy have been assessed, a median of 30 months after start of treatment, for the long-term effects of such treatment on renal, endocrine, audiometric, reproductive and respiratory function. To control for the effects of orchidectomy on endocrine function a similar group of 11 patients cured by orchidectomy alone was also assessed. The extents of impairment in hearing and renal function were related to the total dose of cisplatin received, while the majority of patients had respiratory impairment which was, in part, related to the total dose of bleomycin. TSH was significantly higher in the chemotherapy group although serum free thyroxine and free T3 were normal in all. FSH was raised in 67% of the chemotherapy group although serum free thyroxine and free T3 were while LH was raised in 75% and 45% respectively. Serum testosterone was normal in all. The levels of FSH and LH were both independently correlated with age of the patient while FSH was higher in patients having more chemotherapy and had a tendency to fall towards normal with time since treatment. Over half the patients had normal sperm concentrations although 74% had a raised proportion of abnormal sperm. Indices of sperm function were worse in patients having more chemotherapy but sperm number increased towards normal with time since treatment, particularly after the second year. The long-term side-effects of chemotherapy for testicular cancer are thus generally mild but are largely irreversible and their severity is related to the total amount of chemotherapy received. As their longer term significance is not clear we would recommend that, in the treatment of testicular cancer, doses of chemotherapy are reduced to the minimum required for cure. Assessment of long-term side-effects of chemotherapy for testicular cancer should be a mandatory part of any study of such treatment and should be considered in any comparison of different therapies.

Ifosfamide, mitomycin and radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Ifosfamide and mitomycin C are two of the more active single agents in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluates these drugs in combination followed by radiotherapy. A total of 33 ambulatory patients with inoperable NSCLC were treated with 5 g/m2 ifosfamide as a 24-h infusion, with the concurrent administration of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate (mesna; 160% of the ifosfamide dose) and 6 mg/m2 mitomycin C given as an i.v. bolus injection on the 2nd day. The median age of the patients was 61 years. In all, 20 patients had limited disease and 13, extensive disease. A total of 30 were assessable for response to chemotherapy, 8 of whom achieved a partial response (PR) and 5, a complete response (CR) (2 were verified bronchoscopically). The overall response rate was thus 43%. All but one response (a PR) were in patients with limited disease (LD). A total of 21 patients, including 13 responders, received thoracic irradiation (30 Gy in 8 fractions over 10 days) following chemotherapy. One PR was converted to a radiological CR. In all, 17 (55%) of the patients were alive at 1 year. All patients suffered chemotherapy-induced alopecia (WHO grade 3), but there were no treatment modifications due to myelosuppression, haemorrhagic cystitis or other toxicity. WHO grade 3 nausea and vomiting were seen in all patients. There was one treatment-related death. Combination therapy using ifosfamide and mitomycin C has useful activity in NSCLC.

Chemotherapy for poor risk germ cell tumours. An independent evaluation of the POMB/ACE regime.

We have evaluated the 7-drug, alternating, high-dose cisplatin regime for germ cell tumours, designated POMB/ACE, in 55 patients with advanced malignant teratomas and 5 patients with bulky metastatic seminomas. All of the latter and 5 of the teratoma patients had relapsed following radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both. The previously untreated teratoma patients included 13 whose tumours were extragonadal. The primary testicular tumour patients comprised 16 with large and 21 with very large volume metastases according to the Medical Research Council criteria. POMB/ACE is effective therapy for poor risk patients with germ cell tumours (including those with the most advanced disease, i.e. hepatic and cerebral metastases) and prolonged treatment after marker normality seems unnecessary. It is a complex regime with significant toxicity and cannot be recommended for the treatment of patients with germ cell tumours who have an excellent prognosis with simpler, shorter and less toxic treatment.

Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare.

Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin are three of the most active single agents in the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. We have combined them for a phase 2 study in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. The regimen ('MIC') comprised: mitomycin 6 mg m-2, ifosfamide 3 g m-2 and cis-platin 50 mg m-2, with routine use of lorazepam, dexamethasone and high dose metoclopramide for anti-emesis. Seventy-four ambulatory patients with untreated, limited (LD) or extensive (ED) disease have entered this study, and 66 are evaluable for response. Thirty patients (45%) have achieved partial remission and 7 (11%) complete remission, as assessed radiologically. The overall response rate is thus 56% (95% confidence interval 44%-68%). There have been 29/43 responses in LD (67%, 95% CI 53%-81%) and 8/23 in ED (35%, 95% CI 15%-55%). The median response duration, measured from the start of treatment is 8.75 months. The median survival for the whole group is 9.2 months. The principal toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was severe or prolonged (greater than 48 h) for one or more courses, in 9% of patients. Performance status (PS) and weight were assessed before, and 3 weeks after the last course of chemotherapy. Fifteen (of 31 evaluable) responders improved their PS and only 1 responder deteriorated. Twenty-one of the 28 evaluable non-responders had no change in PS. The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002). Thirty evaluable responders experienced a mean increase in weight of 2.9% with treatment, whereas 24 evaluable non-responders had a mean weight loss of 3.8%. This change is also highly significant (P = 0.0013). MIC is clearly a well tolerated regime and among the most active combinations in non-small cell lung cancer. It will now be tested in a randomized trial against no chemotherapy.

Testing new drugs in untreated small cell lung cancer may prejudice the results of standard treatment: a phase II study of oral idarubicin in extensive disease.

We have evaluated the orally active anthracycline idarubicin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 in divided doses over 24 hours in 21 previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL). Subsequent iv therapy was cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2), vincristine (1 mg/m2), and etoposide (120 mg/m2 iv on Day 1 and 250 mg/m2 orally in divided doses on Day 2; CVE) in patients who failed to respond to idarubicin and in relapsed patients. Three (14%) of 21 patients treated with idarubicin responded, with two complete responses (CR). Patients failing to respond promptly and those who relapsed were treated with CVE. Seven patients did not receive CVE for the following reasons: early death, four patients; early CNS disease, two; and refusal, one. Fourteen patients received CVE. Of 12 patients failing to respond to idarubicin, eight progressed on CVE, three achieved partial response (PR), and one achieved CR. Two idarubicin responders who received CVE achieved PR and CR. The median survival of all 21 patients was 6 months. For those with World Health Organization performance scores of 0 or 1 the median survival was 6.2 months and for the rest it was 2.6 months. Although CVE chemotherapy was instituted promptly in patients not responding to idarubicin, these results seem inferior to those previously seen in our center with standard treatment from the start. We believe that patients with extensive SCCL often require a rapid and more guaranteed response to their first treatment.