Clinical Outcomes in Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An ANZSCTS Database Review 2001-2019.

BACKGROUND: Since the last formal publication reporting on the findings of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) database on surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in 2016, transcatheter approaches have become common practice. There has been an increase in use of TAVR following large, randomised control trials that only report on short-term outcomes in a selective cohort. This study aims to report on primary outcome measures and identify complications associated with SAVR and TAVR from a large national database. METHODS: From the ANZSCTS database (2001-19), 14,097 SAVR and 1,194 TAVR patients were identified with clinical details and 30-day follow-up available. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and/or permanent stroke at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were post-procedure complications requiring treatment. Logistical regression followed by propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS: Using logistical regression when all patient factors considered for all patients who had SAVR and TAVR, the only preoperative factors that had an impact on 30-day mortality was cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, preoperative dialysis, angina, and hypertension. Primary outcome 30-day mortality rate was 1.83% in the SAVR group, and 1.68% in patients in the TAVR group, p=0.7001, and permanent stroke was seen in 1.07% patients in the SAVR group, and 1.26% patients in the TAVR group. Acute limb ischaemia, aortic dissection, ventricular tachycardia, bradyarrhythmia and heart block were more common following TAVR (p<0.001), while reintubation and atrial arrhythmia were more common following SAVR (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the real world SAVR and TAVR have been used in very different patient groups and it is difficult to compare as different baseline characteristics and complications. The two patient groups maintain similarities in primary and secondary endpoints, but differences in life threatening and life altering morbidity remains significant. Collection of SAVR and TAVR data in a combined database may help to better capture and compare these complications and institute strategies to prevent them.

The susceptibility of the aortic root: porcine aortic rupture testing under cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: In our earlier study on the functional limits of the aneurysmal aortic root we determined the pig root is susceptible to failure at high aortic pressures levels. We established a pig rupture model using cardiopulmonary bypass to determine the most susceptible region of the aortic root under the highest pressures achievable using continuous flow, and what changes occur in these regions on a macroscopic and histological level. This information may help guide clinical management of aortic root and ascending aorta pathology. METHODS: Five pigs underwent 4D flow MRI imaging pre surgery to determine vasopressor induced wall sheer stress and flow parameters. All pigs were then placed on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via median sternotomy, and maximal aortic root and ascending aorta flows were initiated until rupture or failure, to determine the most susceptible region of the aorta. The heart was explanted and analysed histologically to determine if histological changes mirror the macroscopic observations. RESULTS: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aortic flow and wall sheer stress (WSS) increased significantly in all regions of the aorta, and the median maximal pressures obtained during cardiopulmonary bypass was 497 mmHg and median maximal flows was 3.96 L/m. The area of failure in all experiments was the non-coronary cusp of the aortic valve. Collagen and elastin composition (%) was greatest in the proximal regions of the aorta. Collagen I and III showed greatest content in the inner aortic root and ascending aorta regions. CONCLUSIONS: This unique porcine model shows that the aortic root is most susceptible to failure at high continuous aortic pressures, supported histologically by different changes in collagen content and subtypes in the aortic root. With further analysis, this information could guide management of the aortic root in disease.

Histological regional analysis of the aortic root and thoracic ascending aorta: a complete analysis of aneurysms from root to arch.

BACKGROUND: Although aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms are treated the same, they differ in embryological development and pathological processes. This study examines the microscopic structural differences between aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms, correlating these features to the macroscopic pathophysiological processes. METHODS: We obtained surgical samples from ascending aortic aneurysms (n = 11), aortic root aneurysms (n = 3), and non-aneurysmal patients (n = 7), Aortic collagen and elastin content were examined via histological analysis, and immunohistochemistry techniques used to determine collagen I, III, and IV subtypes. Analysis was via observational features, and colour deconvolution quantification techniques. RESULTS: Elastin fiber disruption and fragmentation was the most extensive in the proximal aneurysmal regions. Medial fibrosis and collagen density increased in proximal aneurysmal regions and aortic root aneurysms (p < 0.005). Collagen I was seen in highest quantity in aortic root aneurysms. Collagen I content was greatest in the sinus tissue regions compared to the valvular and ostial regions (p < 0.005) Collagen III and IV quantification did not vary greatly. The most susceptible regions to ultrastructural changes in disease are the proximal ascending aorta and aortic root. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic root differs histologically from the ascending aorta confirming its unique composition in aneurysm pathology. These findings should prompt further evaluation on the influence of this altered structure on function which could potentially guide clinical management.

The functional limits of the aneurysmal aortic root. A unique pressure testing apparatus.

BACKGROUND: The aortic root has unique embryological development and is a highly sophisticated and complex structure. In studies that report on the biomechanical characteristics of the thoracic aorta, distinction between the aortic root and ascending aorta regions is nonexistent. Our objective is to determine the maximal pressures at which dissection occurs or tissue failure occurs in the aortic root compared to that of the ascending aorta in the presence of aortic aneurysms. This may help guide preoperative monitoring, diagnosis and the decision for operative intervention for aortic root aneurysms in the normal and susceptible populations. METHODS: We developed a simple aortic root and ascending aorta pressure testing unit in series. Ten fresh porcine hearts were obtained from the local abattoir (n = 5 aortic root and n = 5 ascending aorta for comparison). Using a saline filled needle and syringe, artificial fluid-filled aneurysms were created between the intima and medial layers of the aortic root. The aorta lumen was then progressively filled with saline solution. Pressure measurement was taken at time of loss of tissue integrity, obvious tissue dissection or aneurysm rupture, and the tissue structure was then visually examined. RESULTS: In the aortic root, mean maximal pressure (mmHg) at tissue failure was 208 mmHg. Macroscopic examination revealed luminal tears around the coronary ostia in 2/5 specimens, and in all specimens, there was propagation of the dissection in the aortic root in a circumferential direction. In all ascending aorta specimens, the maximal aortic pressures exceeded 300 mmHg without tissue failure or dissection, and eventual apparatus failure. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the aneurysmal aortic root tissues are at greater risk of rupture and dissection propagation at lower aortic pressure. With further analysis, this could guide clinical and surgical management.

Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Non-Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are used to facilitate circulatory support in standard cardiac surgery and emergency intervention, but CPB and ECMO are not used routinely in non-cardiac surgery involving the thorax and major vessels. The primary aim of this study was to identify the type of non-cardiac procedures and bypass used in our institution and review the patient outcomes including perioperative and bypass complications. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed within the Royal Adelaide Hospital Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit (CTSU) that examined all operations between 2006 and 2014. There were 1,816 non-cardiac cases, of these nine used CPB or ECMO. Cases excluded from the study were those that required cardiac surgical management with the use of CPB or ECMO. RESULTS: Twelve (12) non-cardiac surgery cases were reviewed, with three, and nine cases, respectively, using ECMO and CPB standby or support. The non-cardiac surgical procedures included eight thoracic cases, two renal cases and two tracheal cases. Of the thoracic cases, five were elective, two were bailout and one was an emergency. Both renal cases were bailout (with one as major vessel support and one as standby). Both tracheal cases were bailout (one as an emergency and one as standby). Intraoperative complications included severe haemorrhage in three cases. General postoperative complications included increased analgesia requirement, atelectasis, fever; and prolonged ECMO support and ICU stay which occurred in seven cases. No direct complications of CPB or ECMO are reported. Four of the 12 cases that encompassed thoracic, renal and tracheal surgery are discussed in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of 12 cases managed under the CTSU has shown that extracorporeal circulatory support can be used in a range of thoracic, renal and tracheal surgery. These surgical procedures have involved the management of haemodynamically unstable patients. Patient outcomes have been encouraging with few complications. With further research including the use of a larger sample size and control groups, more definitive conclusions could be made on the benefit of CPB and ECMO to patients in non-cardiac surgery.