Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Hepatitis C Virus Viral Load Assay.

Viral load monitoring for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is necessary to diagnose infection and monitor response to therapy, but the tests involved are currently confined to specialist institutions. There is a need for a fast, accurate assay with limited operator input to enhance the access to viral load monitoring. We evaluated the quantification of HCV RNA in serum and plasma by the Cepheid Xpert HCV Viral Load assay in comparison to the Abbott RealTime HCV assay. Serum and plasma samples were gathered from HCV-infected individuals at four international sites. These were tested with the Xpert HCV Viral Load assay, and results were compared to quantification by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay. An external quality assessment panel of eight samples was also tested. In total, 614 samples were analyzed in the study, and the qualitative results agreed on the two platforms for 588 (95.8%) samples. Further analysis of 396 samples quantified by both tests showed strong correlation (correlation coefficient r = 0.99) across the quantifiable range, with Bland-Altman plot data showing a mean difference (±1.96 standard deviation) of 0.03 ± 0.44 log10 IU/ml. In the external quality assessment panel, the Xpert HCV Viral Load assay results (quantified in log10 IU per milliliter) were within 1 standard deviation of the target value for all but one sample, which was also similarly misquantified by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay. The Xpert HCV Viral Load assay performs well compared to a market-leading HCV viral load test and should be considered for instances where rapid near-to-patient testing is required.

An Antiestrogenic Activity Score for tamoxifen and its metabolites is associated with breast cancer outcome.

PURPOSE: Endoxifen concentrations have been associated with breast cancer recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients. However, tamoxifen itself and other metabolites also show antiestrogenic anti-tumor activity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), which accounts for concentration and antiestrogenic activity of tamoxifen and three metabolites. An association between the AAS and recurrence-free survival was investigated and compared to a previously published threshold for endoxifen concentrations of 5.97 ng/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The antiestrogenic activities of tamoxifen, (Z)-endoxifen, (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen, and N-desmethyltamoxifen were determined in a cell proliferation assay. The AAS was determined by calculating the sum of each metabolite concentration multiplied by an IC50 ratio, relative to tamoxifen. The AAS was calculated for 1370 patients with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer. An association between AAS and recurrence was investigated using Cox regression and compared with the 5.97 ng/mL endoxifen threshold using concordance indices. RESULTS: An AAS threshold of 1798 was associated with recurrence-free survival, hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.96), bias corrected after bootstrap HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.48-0.99). The concordance indices for AAS and endoxifen did not significantly differ; however, using the AAS threshold instead of endoxifen led to different dose recommendations for 5.2% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endoxifen concentrations can serve as a proxy for the antiestrogenic effect of tamoxifen and metabolites. However, for the aggregate effect of tamoxifen and three metabolites, defined by an integrative algorithm, a trend towards improving treatment is seen and moreover, is significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence.

Multi-site clinical evaluation of the Xpert(®) HIV-1 viral load assay.

BACKGROUND: The most important reason for measuring HIV-1 viral load (VL) is to monitor the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART), both for the initial therapeutic response and sustained responses. Maintaining low or undetectable HIV-1 VL levels can reduce both the risks of progression to AIDS and transmission of infection to others. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert(®) HIV-1 Viral Load (VL) assay compared to the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay, including assessing specificity by testing plasma specimens from confirmed HIV-1 negative blood donors. STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were enrolled from 4 participating sites, 2 in Europe and 2 in the USA. Fresh plasma samples were tested prospectively, while frozen plasma samples were collected prospectively, and tested retrospectively after selection of specimens to cover the assay's quantification range (40cp/mL-10,000,000 cp/mL). Eligibility criteria included a clinician ordered HIV-1 VL test from a confirmed HIV-1 positive adult (≥18 years) with a known antiviral treatment status. Exclusion criteria included previous enrollment in this study or improper specimen collection. Human blood donor specimens determined to be HIV-1 negative by standard blood bank antibody and nucleic acid amplification methods were used to assess specificity. RESULTS: Of the 764 specimens collected, 752 were eligible for inclusion but 5 were not tested by the Xpert, leaving 747 specimens tested (28.2% from females and 71.8% from males). Valid results were obtained for 724/747 (96.9%) specimens tested using the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay. The Xpert HIV-1 VL assay detected or quantified 568/724 (78.5%) specimens, while the RealTime HIV-1 assay detected or quantified 559/724 (77.2%). Of the 724 specimens tested by both assays, 390 were quantified by both assays and showed strong correlation: r=0.9847, with an R(2)=0.9696. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the two assays (381/390; 97.7%) with a distribution within 0.5 log10 cp/mL centered around zero. Xpert yielded VLs for 393 (80%) of the 494 quantifiable samples by Abbott. VLs of those specimens quantified by one of the assays, and either detected but not quantified or not detected by the other assay were all <170cp/mL. Specificity of the Xpert assay was found to be 100% (109/109), 95% CI: 96.7-100.0. CONCLUSION: Very good correlation was seen between the Xpert HIV-1 VL and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assays, with added benefits for Xpert HIV-1 VL of: (1) lot-to-lot consistency traceable to WHO International Standard, (2) requiring both high and low level internal controls to be in range to have a valid result, (3) use of a single HIV-1 target for PCR and (4) faster turn-around-time for results, no need to wait to do batch testing of specimens. In summary, Xpert HIV-1 VL generated accurate VL results that if implemented could allow for actionable and timely treatment decisions during the same clinic visit. This scenario could reduce the loss to follow up often seen when these test results take days to weeks to become available to the clinician and patient.

Evaluation of tamoxifen and metabolites by LC-MS/MS and HPLC methods.

Epidemiological and laboratory evidence suggests that quantification of serum or plasma levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites, 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (endoxifen), Z-4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT), N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (ND-tam), is a clinically useful tool in the assessment and monitoring of breast cancer status in patients taking adjuvant tamoxifen. A liquid chromatographic mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure the blood levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites. This fully automated analytical method is specific, accurate and sensitive. The LC-MS/MS automated technique has now become a widely accepted reference method. This study analysed a randomly selected batch of blood samples from participants enrolled in a breast cancer study to compare results from this reference method in 40 samples with those obtained from a recently developed high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection. The mean (SD) concentrations for the LC-MS/MS method (endoxifen 12.6 [7.5] ng/mL, tamoxifen 105 [44] ng/mL, 4-HT 1.9 [1.0] ng/mL, ND-tam 181 [69] ng/mL) and the HPLC method (endoxifen 13.1 [7.8] ng/mL, tamoxifen 108 [55] ng/mL, 4-HT 1.8 [0.8] ng/mL, ND-tam 184 [81] ng/mL) did not show any significant differences. The results confirm that the HPLC method offers an accurate and comparable alternative for the quantification of tamoxifen and tamoxifen metabolites.

CYP2D6 genotype and adjuvant tamoxifen: meta-analysis of heterogeneous study populations.

The International Tamoxifen Pharmacogenomics Consortium was established to address the controversy regarding cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) status and clinical outcomes in tamoxifen therapy. We performed a meta-analysis on data from 4,973 tamoxifen-treated patients (12 globally distributed sites). Using strict eligibility requirements (postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, receiving 20 mg/day tamoxifen for 5 years, criterion 1); CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status was associated with poorer invasive disease-free survival (IDFS: hazard ratio = 1.25; 95% confidence interval = 1.06, 1.47; P = 0.009). However, CYP2D6 status was not statistically significant when tamoxifen duration, menopausal status, and annual follow-up were not specified (criterion 2, n = 2,443; P = 0.25) or when no exclusions were applied (criterion 3, n = 4,935; P = 0.38). Although CYP2D6 is a strong predictor of IDFS using strict inclusion criteria, because the results are not robust to inclusion criteria (these were not defined a priori), prospective studies are necessary to fully establish the value of CYP2D6 genotyping in tamoxifen therapy.

Association of CYP2C9*2 with bosentan-induced liver injury.

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an endothelin receptor antagonist prescribed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Its use is limited by drug-induced liver injury (DILI). To identify genetic markers of DILI, association analyses were performed on 56 Caucasian PAH patients receiving bosentan. Twelve functional polymorphisms in five genes (ABCB11, ABCC2, CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, and SLCO1B3) implicated in bosentan pharmacokinetics were tested for associations with alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and DILI. After adjusting for body mass index, CYP2C9*2 was the only polymorphism associated with ALT, AST, and DILI (ß = 2.16, P = 0.024; ß = 1.92, P = 0.016; odds ratio 95% CI = 2.29-∞, P = 0.003, respectively). Bosentan metabolism by CYP2C9*2 in vitro was significantly reduced compared with CYP2C9*1 and was comparable to that by CYP2C9*3. These results suggest that CYP2C9*2 is a potential genetic marker for prediction of bosentan-induced liver injury and warrants investigation for the optimization of bosentan treatment.

Cross-reactivity studies and predictive modeling of "Bath Salts" and other amphetamine-type stimulants with amphetamine screening immunoassays.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing abuse of amphetamine-like compounds presents a challenge for clinicians and clinical laboratories. Although these compounds may be identified by mass spectrometry-based assays, most clinical laboratories use amphetamine immunoassays that have unknown cross-reactivity with novel amphetamine-like drugs. To date, there has been a little systematic study of amphetamine immunoassay cross-reactivity with structurally diverse amphetamine-like drugs or of computational tools to predict cross-reactivity. METHODS: Cross-reactivities of 42 amphetamines and amphetamine-like drugs with three amphetamines screening immunoassays (AxSYM(®) Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II, CEDIA(®) amphetamine/Ecstasy, and EMIT(®) II Plus Amphetamines) were determined. Two- and three-dimensional molecular similarity and modeling approaches were evaluated for the ability to predict cross-reactivity using receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 34%-46% of the drugs tested positive on the immunoassay screens using a concentration of 20,000 ng/mL. The three immunoassays showed differential detection of the various classes of amphetamine-like drugs. Only the CEDIA assay detected piperazines well, while only the EMIT assay cross-reacted with the 2C class. All three immunoassays detected 4-substituted amphetamines. For the AxSYM and EMIT assays, two-dimensional molecular similarity methods that combined similarity to amphetamine/methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethampetamine most accurately predicted cross-reactivity. For the CEDIA assay, three-dimensional pharmacophore methods performed best in predicting cross-reactivity. Using the best performing models, cross-reactivities of an additional 261 amphetamine-like compounds were predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Existing amphetamines immunoassays unevenly detect amphetamine-like drugs, particularly in the 2C, piperazine, and ß-keto classes. Computational similarity methods perform well in predicting cross-reactivity and can help prioritize testing of additional compounds in the future.

Rapid screening for the detection of HLA-B57 and HLA-B58 in prevention of drug hypersensitivity.

HLA-B57 and HLA-B58 are major histocompatibility class (MHC)-I allotypes that are potentially predictive of important clinical immune phenotypes. HLA-B*5701 is strongly associated with hypersensitivity to the HIV drug abacavir, liver toxicity from the antibiotic flucloxacillin and is a marker for slow progression of HIV AIDS. HLA-B*5801 is associated with hypersensitivity to allopurinol used to treat hyperuricaemia and recurrent gout. Here we describe a monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for HLA-B57 and HLA-B58 that provides an inexpensive and sensitive screen for these MHC-I allotypes. The usefulness of HLA-B57 screening for prediction of abacavir hypersensitivity was shown in three independent laboratories, including confirmation of the mAb sensitivity and specificity in a cohort of patients enrolled in the PREDICT-1 trial. Our data show that patients who test negative by mAb screening comprise 90%-95% of all individuals in most human populations and require no further human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing. Patients who test positive by mAb screening should proceed to high-resolution typing to ascertain the presence of HLA-B*5701 or HLA-B*5801. Hence, mAb screening provides a low-cost alternative to high-resolution typing of all patients and lends itself to point-of-care diagnostics and rapid ascertainment of low-risk patients who can begin immediate therapy with abacavir, flucloxacillin or allopurinol.

Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and breast cancer outcomes.

We explored whether breast cancer outcomes are associated with endoxifen and other metabolites of tamoxifen and examined potential correlates of endoxifen concentration levels in serum including cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolizer phenotype and body mass index (BMI). Concentration levels of tamoxifen, endoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OH-tamoxifen), and N-desmethyltamoxifen (ND-tamoxifen) were measured from samples taken from 1,370 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who were participating in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study. We tested these concentration levels for possible associations with breast cancer outcomes and found that breast cancer outcomes were not associated with the concentration levels of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and ND-tamoxifen. For endoxifen, a threshold was identified, with women in the upper four quintiles of endoxifen concentration appearing to have a 26% lower recurrence rate than women in the bottom quintile (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), (0.55-1.00)). The predictors of this higher-risk bottom quintile were poor/intermediate metabolizer genotype, higher BMI, and lower tamoxifen concentrations as compared with the mean for the cohort as a whole. This study suggests that there is a minimal concentration threshold above which endoxifen is effective against the recurrence of breast cancer and that ~80% of tamoxifen takers attain this threshold.

Effect of single-dose rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Based on in vitro rat and human hepatocyte uptake studies showing inhibition of warfarin uptake in the presence of the nonspecific organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibitor rifampin, a clinical study was conducted in 10 healthy volunteers to examine the in vivo relevance of OATP hepatic uptake on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin. In a randomized, single-dose, two-period, crossover design, subjects received a 7.5-mg dose of warfarin, either alone or immediately following a 600-mg intravenous dose of rifampin. Rifampin did not significantly alter the R- or S-warfarin area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) from 0 to 12 h (period of hepatic OATP inhibition by rifampin) or the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) value. AUC(0-∞) was decreased on days rifampin was administered, for both R-warfarin (25% reduction; P < 0.001) and S-warfarin (15% reduction; P < 0.05). No differences were seen in the area under the international normalized ratio (INR)-time curve. Our study suggests that hepatic uptake via OATPs may not be clinically important in the pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

Limitations of point-of-care testing in the ED or ICU: a role for regional centralized toxicology laboratories.

Although speed in reporting results of clinical laboratory testing for emergency department and intensive care unit patients is always desirable, for clinical toxicology purposes, tests using immunoassays from the central laboratory or point-of-care devices do not have adequate performance or cover the menu of drugs needed to meet clinical standards. Therefore, a regional toxicology laboratory using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is desirable for accurate and comprehensive coverage of drug testing.

Reference values for cardiac troponins I and T in a goal-oriented concept of health: cardiac marker values in a series of outpatients without acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins are part of the new definition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC). In the new guidelines, it was suggested to establish reference values for cardiac troponins to calculate the 0.99 quantile (Q99) as cutoff for AMI diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We run a prospective series of troponin measurements in unselected outpatients who had no suspicion of cardiac ischemia. The selection of patients as reference population is based on a "goal-oriented concept of health". One hundred and ninety-five patients agreed that 10-ml additional blood was drawn at the occasion of the venous puncture done routinely in the evaluation of their case. Cardiac troponin I was measured using a point of care (POCT) device (Stratus CS, DadeBehring, TNI-PO). Additionally, heparin-plasma was obtained and immediately deep-frozen to -80 degrees C for later batch measurement of cardiac troponin T (Elecsys 2010, Roche Diagnostics, TnT) and troponin I (Centaur, Bayer, TnI-CL). RESULTS: The Q99 values were 0.14 microg/l for TnI-PO, 0.023 microg/l for TnT and 0.07 microg/l for TnI-CL in patients with creatinine levels below 1.5 mg/dl. These values lay above those obtained from people at good health for reference study purposes. On the level of our cutoffs, CVs were 7.5%, 6.4% and 23.7% for TnI-PO, TnT and TnI-CL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Only the TnI-PO and TnT tests fulfilled the imprecision criteria in our study. TnI-PO values between 0.10 and 0.14 microg/l and TnT values between 0.01 and 0.03 microg/l have to be interpreted carefully. Patients presenting with chest pain will be possibly true positives, but patients without chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs should be subjected to repetitive troponin measurements and further noninvasive investigation and maybe not directly sent to the cardiac catheter laboratory.