Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncotarget ; 7(22): 33472-82, 2016 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26985769

RESUMEN

Cancer immunotherapy has primarily been focused on attacking tumor cells. However, given the close interaction between tumor cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME), CAF-targeted strategies could also contribute to an integrated cancer immunotherapy. Fibroblast activation protein α (FAP α) is not detectible in normal tissues, but is overexpressed by CAFs and is the predominant component of the stroma in most types of cancer. FAP α has both dipeptidyl peptidase and endopeptidase activities, cleaving substrates at a post-proline bond. When all FAP α-expressing cells (stromal and cancerous) are destroyed, tumors rapidly die. Furthermore, a FAP α antibody, FAP α vaccine, and modified vaccine all inhibit tumor growth and prolong survival in mouse models, suggesting FAP α is an adaptive tumor-associated antigen. This review highlights the role of FAP α in tumor development, explores the relationship between FAP α and immune suppression in the TME, and discusses FAP α as a potential immunotherapeutic target.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Fibroblastos Asociados al Cáncer/efectos de los fármacos , Gelatinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Proteínas de la Membrana/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/terapia , Animales , Fibroblastos Asociados al Cáncer/enzimología , Fibroblastos Asociados al Cáncer/inmunología , Fibroblastos Asociados al Cáncer/patología , Muerte Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Endopeptidasas , Gelatinasas/inmunología , Gelatinasas/metabolismo , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias/enzimología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/patología , Serina Endopeptidasas/inmunología , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Escape del Tumor , Microambiente Tumoral
2.
Oncotarget ; 6(28): 25932-42, 2015 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26305550

RESUMEN

Fibroblast activation protein α (FAPα) is a potential target for cancer therapy. However, elimination of FAPα+ fibroblasts activates secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α. IFN-γ can in turn induce expression indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), thereby contributing to immunosuppression, while TNF-α can induce EMT. These two reactive effects would limit the efficacy of a tumor vaccine. We found that curcumin can inhibit IDO expression and TNF-α-induced EMT. Moreover, FAPαc vaccine and CpG combined with curcumin lavage inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival of mice implanted with melanoma cells. The combination of FAPαc vaccine, CpG and curcumin stimulated FAPα antibody production and CD8+ T cell-mediated killing of FAPα-expressing stromal cells without adverse reactive effects. We suggest a combination of curcumin and FAPαc vaccine for melanoma therapy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Transición Epitelial-Mesenquimal/efectos de los fármacos , Gelatinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Indolamina-Pirrol 2,3,-Dioxigenasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Melanoma Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de la Membrana/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Western Blotting , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Curcumina/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Endopeptidasas , Femenino , Gelatinasas/inmunología , Gelatinasas/metabolismo , Inmunohistoquímica , Indolamina-Pirrol 2,3,-Dioxigenasa/metabolismo , Melanoma Experimental/metabolismo , Melanoma Experimental/patología , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Oligodesoxirribonucleótidos/administración & dosificación , Serina Endopeptidasas/inmunología , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/farmacología
3.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(10): 4347-51, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028097

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) were involved in glutathione metabolism and genetic polymorphisms of ribonucleotide reductase (RRM1) were correlated with DNA synthesis. Here we explored the effects of these polymorphisms on the chemosensitivity and clinical outcome in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA sequencing was used to evaluate genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 Ile105Val and RRM1 C37A-T524C in 47 NSCLC patients treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin regimens. Clinical response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and toxicity was assessed by 1979 WHO criteria (acute and subacute toxicity graduation criteria in chemotherapeutic agents). RESULTS: There was no statistical significance between sensitive and non-sensitive groups regarding the genotype frequency distribution of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism (p>0.05). But for RRM1 C37A-T524C genotype, sensitive group had higher proportion of high effective genotype than non-sensitive group (p=0.009). And according to the joint detection of GSTP1 Ile105Val and RRM1 C37A-T524C polymorphisms, the proportion of type A (A/A+high effective genotype) was significantly higher in sensitive group than in non-sensitive group (p=0.009). Toxicity showed no correlation with the genotypes between two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with single detection of genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 Ile105Val or RRM1 C37A-T524C, joint detection of both may be more helpful for patients with NSCLC to receive gemcitabine-cisplatin regimens as the first-line chemotherapy. Especially, genetic polymorphism of RRM1 is more likely to be used as an important biomarker to predict the response and toxicity of gemcitabine-cisplatin combination chemotherapy in NSCLC.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Gutatión-S-Transferasa pi/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , China , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Ribonucleósido Difosfato Reductasa , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA