Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Interim results from the NuProtect Study.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) is a fourth generation recombinant FVIII, produced in a human cell line, without chemical modification or protein fusion. No inhibitors developed in studies with Nuwiq® in 201 previously treated patients with haemophilia A (HA). The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe HA are being assessed in the ongoing NuProtect study. METHODS: The study, conducted across 38 centres worldwide, is evaluating 110 true PUPs of all ages and ethnicities enrolled for study up to 100 exposure days (EDs) or 5 years maximum. The primary objective is to assess the immunogenicity of Nuwiq® (inhibitor activity ≥0.6 BU) using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay at a central laboratory. RESULTS: Data for 66 PUPs with ≥20 EDs from a preplanned interim analysis were analysed. High-titre (HT) inhibitors developed in 8 of 66 patients after a median of 11.5 EDs (range 6-24). Five patients developed low-titre inhibitors (4 transient). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) was 12.8% (4.5%, 21.2%) for HT inhibitors and 20.8% (10.7%, 31.0%) for all inhibitors. During inhibitor-free periods, median annualized bleeding rates during prophylaxis were 0 for spontaneous bleeds and 2.40 for all bleeds. Efficacy was rated as "excellent" or "good" in treating 91.8% of bleeds. Efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was "excellent" or "good" for 8 (89%) procedures and "moderate" for 1 (11%). No tolerability concerns were evident. CONCLUSION: These interim data show a cumulative incidence of 12.8% for HT inhibitors and convincing efficacy and tolerability in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® .

Tailored prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A: interim results from the first 5 years of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic treatment for severe hemophilia A is likely to be more effective than treatment when bleeding occurs, however, prophylaxis is costly. We studied an inception cohort of 25 boys using a tailored prophylaxis approach to see if clotting factor use could be reduced with acceptable outcomes. METHODS: Ten Canadian centers enrolled subjects in this 5-year study. Children were followed every 3 months at a comprehensive care hemophilia clinic. They were initially treated with once-weekly clotting factor; the frequency was escalated in a stepwise fashion if unacceptable bleeding occurred. Bleeding frequency, target joint development, physiotherapy and radiographic outcomes, as well as resource utilization, were determined prospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.1 years (total 96.9 person-years). The median time to escalate to twice-weekly therapy was 3.42 years (lower 95% confidence limit 2.05 years). Nine subjects developed target joints at a rate of 0.09 per person-year. There was an average of 1.2 joint bleeds per person-year. The cohort consumed on average 3656 IU kg(-1)year(-1) of factor (F) VIII. Ten subjects required central venous catheters (three while on study); no complications of these devices were seen. One subject developed a transient FVIII inhibitor. End-of-study joint examination scores--both clinically and radiographically--were normal or near-normal. CONCLUSIONS: Most boys with severe hemophilia A will probably have little bleeding and good joint function with tailored prophylaxis, while infusing less FVIII than usually required for traditional prophylaxis.

Development of a health-related quality of life measure for boys with haemophilia: the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes--Kids Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT).

Several measures of quality of life (QoL) are available for children with haemophilia. However, most are not disease-specific and few focus on children's perspectives. The purpose of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of QoL that included the perspectives of boys with haemophilia. A list of potential items was developed from the literature, other measures, and input from five discussion sessions with adults with haemophilia, children with haemophilia and their parents and haemophilia nurses. The list was augmented with items generated by three focus groups with children and three focus groups with parents. These groups also prioritized items and recommended a domain structure. Supplemental information was gathered by surveying haematologists. Data from all sources were analysed to reduce the number of items using a two-step approach, based on rules that weighted the children's priorities most heavily. The remaining items were compiled into a questionnaire that was pilot tested with 10 children and their parents. The total item pool contained 228 potential items. Of these, 33 were removed based on three focus groups and survey responses, 72 were removed after the completion of all focus groups and 46 were removed due to redundancy. This resulted in a 77-item version of the CHO-KLAT. Pilot testing identified the need to subdivide two items, resulting in a 79-item CHO-KLAT. The CHO-KLAT is a promising disease-specific measure of QoL that reflects children's unique perspectives. This child-centric focus distinguishes the CHO-KLAT from alternative measures of QoL. Further research will assess the measurement properties of the CHO-KLAT.