68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the evaluation of metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of gallium-68-prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of studies published before August 2021 in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was conducted.The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were selected for qualitative and quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting metastases in PCa patients were selected for qualitative analysis, 16 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The sensitivities of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node metastases ranged from 33.3% to 96.08%, with high specificities ranged from 82% to 100%. Gallium-68-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated outstanding diagnostic performance in PCa patients with bone metastases. Only two articles about 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for lung metastases showed that the detection value was limited. It was difficult to distinguish lung metastases in PCa patients from benign lesions or primary lung cancer. There was only one article about 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for liver metastases, which showed that about 77.7% of metastatic lesions will be 68Ga-PSMA-positive and 22.3% will be false negatives. Due to the lack of articles on PCa visceral metastases, we only conducted a meta-analysis on lymph node metastases and bone metastases. In our meta-analysis, the per-patient pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of lymph node metastases were 0.61, 0.96, 14.4, 0.41, 35, and 0.95, respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and AUC of V were 0.74, 0.99, 76.0, 0.26, 289 and 0.99, respectively. The per-patient pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and AUC of bone metastases were 0.97, 1.00, 1100.1, 0.03, 37490 and 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gallium-68-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated outstanding diagnostic performance for bone metastases in PCa patients. The majority of lymph node metastases, lung metastases, and liver metastases overexpressed PSMA, which could be directly detected. However, a considerable number of lesions were false negatives.

Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published between January 1990 and September 2018. Two evaluators independently extracted the sensitivity, specificity, the numbers of true and false positives, and true and false negatives. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each method. We calculated the tests' diagnostic odds ratios (DOR); drew the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves; and obtained the areas under the curves (AUC), Q* values, and 95% CIs. RESULTS: The per-patient pooled sensitivities of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and BS were 0.97, 0.87, 0.96, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively. The pooled DOR values were 504.16, 673.67, 242.63, and 114.44, respectively. The AUC were 1.00, 0.99, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.95, respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivities of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone imaging were 0.88, 0.80, 0.97, 0.81 and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the meta-analysis, PSMA-PET/CT had the highest per-patient sensitivity and specificity in detecting bone metastases with prostate cancer. The sensitivities of NaF-PET/CT and MRI were better than those for choline-PET/CT and BS. The specificity of PSMA-PET/CT was significantly better than BS. Others were similar. For per-lesion, NaF-PET/CT had the highest sensitivity, PSMA-PET/CT had higher sensitivity than choline-PET/CT and MRI, and BS had the lowest sensitivity.