A case of primary hepatic stromal tumour misdiagnosed as a liver cyst.

Primary hepatic stromal tumours are very rare and there are only sporadic reports in the literature. Due to the lack of specificity in their clinical manifestations and imaging features, these tumours are easily misdiagnosed. This current report presents a case of primary liver stromal tumour that was misdiagnosed as a liver cyst. The 72-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital due to right upper abdomen fullness and discomfort for more than 2 weeks. Colour Doppler ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography examinations revealed a cystic mass in the right lobe of the liver. The preoperative diagnosis was a liver cyst and the laparoscopic fenestration was performed. The pathological examination demonstrated that it was a primary hepatic stromal tumour. Gastroenteroscopy was performed postoperatively and no lesions were found in the gastrointestinal tract. Imatinib mesylate was given orally as the salvage therapy and a radical operation was planned at the patient's request. This current case serves as a reminder that clinicians should consider the possibility that it could be a primary hepatic stromal tumour rather than a hepatic cyst. A multidisciplinary team is necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with a primary hepatic stromal tumour.

Early Research on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis.

In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia, which was named COVID-2019, emerged as a global health crisis. Scientists worldwide are engaged in attempts to elucidate the transmission and pathogenic mechanisms of the causative coronavirus. COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, making it critical to track and review the state of research on COVID-19 to provide guidance for further investigations. Here, bibliometric and knowledge mapping analyses of studies on COVID-19 were performed, including more than 1,500 papers on COVID-19 available in the PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from January 1, 2020 to March 8, 2020. In this review, we found that because of the rapid response of researchers worldwide, the number of COVID-19-related publications showed a high growth trend in the first 10 days of February; among these, the largest number of studies originated in China, the country most affected by pandemic in its early stages. Our findings revealed that the epidemic situation and data accessibility of different research teams have caused obvious difference in emphases of the publications. Besides, there was an unprecedented level of close cooperation and information sharing within the global scientific community relative to previous coronavirus research. We combed and drew the knowledge map of the SARS-CoV-2 literature, explored early status of research on etiology, pathology, epidemiology, treatment, prevention, and control, and discussed knowledge gaps that remain to be urgently addressed. Future perspectives on treatment, prevention, and control are also presented to provide fundamental references for current and future coronavirus research.