Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the procedure-related risk of miscarriage after amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) based on a systematic review of the literature and an updated meta-analysis. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library was carried out to identify studies reporting complications following CVS or amniocentesis. Eligible for inclusion were large controlled studies reporting data for pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks' gestation. Study authors were contacted when required to identify additional necessary data. Data for cases that had an invasive procedure and controls were inputted into contingency tables and the risk of miscarriage was estimated for each study. Summary statistics based on a random-effects model were calculated after taking into account the weighting for each study included in the systematic review. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage was estimated as a weighted risk difference from the summary statistics for cases and controls. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the similarity in risk levels for chromosomal abnormality between the invasive-testing and control groups. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Egger's bias was estimated to assess reporting bias in published studies. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 2943 potential citations, from which 12 controlled studies for amniocentesis and seven for CVS were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. A total of 580 miscarriages occurred following 63 723 amniocentesis procedures, resulting in a weighted risk of pregnancy loss of 0.91% (95% CI, 0.73-1.09%). In the control group, there were 1726 miscarriages in 330 469 pregnancies with a loss rate of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.47-0.70%). The weighted procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis was 0.30% (95% CI, 0.11-0.49%; I2 = 70.1%). A total of 163 miscarriages occurred following 13 011 CVS procedures, resulting in a risk of pregnancy loss of 1.39% (95% CI, 0.76-2.02%). In the control group, there were 1946 miscarriages in 232 680 pregnancies with a loss rate of 1.23% (95% CI, 0.86-1.59%). The weighted procedure-related risk of miscarriage following CVS was 0.20% (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.52%; I2 = 52.7%). However, when studies including only women with similar risk profiles for chromosomal abnormality in the intervention and control groups were considered, the procedure-related risk for amniocentesis was 0.12% (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.30%; I2 = 44.1%) and for CVS it was -0.11% (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.08%; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The procedure-related risks of miscarriage following amniocentesis and CVS are lower than currently quoted to women. The risk appears to be negligible when these interventions were compared to control groups of the same risk profile. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Riesgo de aborto después de una amniocentesis o una biopsia de vellosidades coriónicas: revisión sistemática de bibliografía y metaanálisis actualizado OBJETIVO: Estimar el riesgo de aborto relacionado con el procedimiento de la amniocentesis o la biopsia de vellosidades coriónicas (BVC) mediante una revisión sistemática de bibliografía y un metaanálisis actualizado. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en MEDLINE, EMBASE y The Cochrane Library para identificar estudios que reportaron sobre complicaciones después de una BVC o amniocentesis. Se consideraron elegibles para su inclusión los estudios controlados de gran tamaño que reportaron datos sobre la pérdida del embarazo antes de las 24 semanas de gestación. Se estableció contacto con los autores de los estudios cuando fue necesario para identificar datos adicionales necesarios. Se introdujeron en tablas de contingencia los datos de los casos que se sometieron a un procedimiento invasivo y controles y se estimó el riesgo de aborto para cada estudio. Las estadísticas resumen basadas en un modelo de efectos aleatorios se calcularon después de tener en cuenta la ponderación para cada estudio incluido en la revisión sistemática. El riesgo de aborto relacionado con cada procedimiento se estimó como una diferencia de riesgo ponderada de las estadísticas resumen para los casos y controles. Los análisis de subgrupos se realizaron de acuerdo con la similitud en los niveles de riesgo de anomalías cromosómicas entre los grupos de prueba invasiva y de control. La heterogeneidad se evaluó mediante el test estadístico I2 . Se estimó el sesgo de Egger para evaluar el sesgo de información reportada en los estudios publicados. RESULTADOS: La búsqueda electrónica arrojó 2943 citas potenciales, de las cuales se seleccionaron para su inclusión en la revisión sistemática 12 estudios controlados para la amniocentesis y siete para la BVC. Después de los 63723 procedimientos de amniocentesis sucedieron un total de 580 abortos, lo que resultó en un riesgo ponderado de pérdida de embarazo del 0,91% (IC 95%, 0,73-1,09%). En el grupo de control hubo 1726 abortos en 330469 embarazos, con una tasa de pérdida del 0,58% (IC 95%, 0,47-0,70%). El riesgo ponderado de aborto relacionado con el procedimiento de amniocentesis fue del 0,30% (IC 95%, 0,11-0,49%; I2  = 70,1%). Después de 13011 procedimientos de BVC se produjeron un total de 163 abortos, lo que resultó en un riesgo de pérdida de embarazo del 1,39% (IC 95%, 0,76-2,02%). En el grupo de control hubo 1946 abortos en 232680 embarazos, lo que supuso una tasa de pérdida del 1,23% (IC 95%, 0,86-1,59%). El riesgo ponderado de aborto relacionado con el procedimiento de BVC fue de 0,20% (IC 95%, -0,13-0,52%; I2  = 52,7%). Sin embargo, cuando se consideraron los estudios que incluyeron sólo mujeres con perfiles de riesgo similares para la anomalía cromosómica en los grupos de intervención y control, el riesgo relacionado con el procedimiento de la amniocentesis fue de 0,12% (IC 95%, -0,05-0,30%; I2  = 44.1%) y para el MVC fue de -0,11% (IC 95%, -0,29-0,08%; I2  = 0%). CONCLUSIONES: Los riesgos de aborto relacionados con el procedimiento de la amniocentesis y la BVC son menores que los actualmente mencionados a las mujeres. El riesgo parece ser insignificante cuando estas intervenciones se compararon con grupos de control del mismo perfil de riesgo.

Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess cervical length (CL) longitudinally between the first and second trimesters and to determine the proportion of women with short CL. The study also aimed to assess if women with short CL at 19-24 weeks' gestation could be identified at the time of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) at 11-14 weeks' gestation, in order to determine the potential value of implementation of CL screening for prediction of preterm delivery in a Danish population. METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal study of women with singleton pregnancy attending three University Hospitals in Denmark for combined first-trimester screening from 1 November 2013 to 1 December 2014. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancy, uterine anomaly, cerclage or progesterone treatment at inclusion. CL was measured on transvaginal sonography at 11-14 weeks (Cx1), 19-21 weeks (Cx2) and 23-24 weeks (Cx3), by trained operators as a straight line from external to internal os. Women with CL ≤ 25 mm were referred to a maternal-fetal medicine specialist for treatment according to a standardized management protocol. RESULTS: Of the 4904 eligible women, 3477 (71%) participated and had Cx1 recorded. Of those, 3232 (93.0%) had CL measured on all three scans. Median Cx1 was 37 mm, and median Cx2 and Cx3 were 40 mm. The proportion of women with CL ≤ 25 mm increased with gestational age, from 0.41% (95% CI, 0.19-0.62%) at Cx1 to 1.79% (95% CI, 1.34-2.24%) at Cx3. In total, the proportion of women with second-trimester CL (Cx2 or Cx3) ≤ 25 mm was 2.0% (n = 67), of which 38.8% (n = 26) were detected at 19-21 weeks. The probability of short CL between 19 and 24 weeks was greater for those with shorter first-trimester CL. It was nearly nine-fold higher for women with Cx1 ≤ 25 mm compared with Cx1 ≥ 35 mm (17% vs 2%). The performance of Cx1 for prediction of short second-trimester CL was 50% at a 10% false-positive rate. It was found that more than 1500 women would need to be screened for short CL at 19-21 weeks to prevent one case of spontaneous preterm delivery before 34 weeks in a population such as the one in this study. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between first-trimester CL and risk of short cervix in the second trimester. Once short CL was observed, risk of preterm delivery was greatly increased. However, whether universal CL screening should be implemented in this low-risk population depends on cost-benefit analysis taking into account the low proportions of women with short CL and at risk for preterm delivery. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the risk of fetal loss associated with chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC) following combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) for Down syndrome. METHODS: This was a nationwide population-based study (Danish Fetal Medicine Database, 2008-2010) including 147,987 women with singleton pregnancy who underwent cFTS. Propensity score stratification was used to assess the risk of fetal loss with and without invasive testing. Analyses were performed between 3 and 21 days after cFTS for CVS and between 28 and 42 days after cFTS for AC. Results are reported as average risk differences with 95% CIs. RESULTS: The risks of miscarriage and stillbirth were not higher in women exposed to CVS or AC compared with unexposed women, independent of the analysis time-point. The average effect of CVS on risk of miscarriage was -0.08% (95% CI, -0.64; 0.47) at 3 days and -0.21% (95% CI, -0.58; 0.15) at 21 days after cFTS, while the effect on risk of stillbirth was -0.18% (95% CI, -0.50; 0.13) at 3 days and -0.27% (95% CI, -0.58; 0.04) at 21 days after cFTS. Regarding the effect of AC on risk of miscarriage, the analysis at 28 days after cFTS showed an average effect of 0.56% (95% CI, -0.21; 1.33), while the effect on risk of stillbirth was 0.09% (95% CI, -0.39; 0.58) at 42 days after cFTS. CONCLUSION: Neither CVS nor AC was associated with increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth. These findings indicate that the procedure-related risk of CVS and AC is very low.