De-escalation of the Agitated Pediatric Patient: A Standardized Patient Case for Pediatric Residents.

Introduction: Over the past 5 years, pediatric mental health emergencies requiring emergency safety evaluations and inpatient boarding of pediatric patients requiring psychiatric admission have increased. Pediatric trainees must learn to effectively and safely de-escalate a patient with agitated or aggressive behavior, as mental health patients take up a larger proportion of their patient population. This standardized patient case addresses gaps in knowledge and skills to ameliorate the care of children and adolescents with behavioral crises in the hospital. Methods: Resident learners were presented with a teenage patient admitted to the hospital and awaiting inpatient psychiatric placement for suicidal ideation who became acutely agitated with aggressive behaviors. Learners were expected to attempt to verbally de-escalate the patient and select an appropriate pharmacologic agent for decreasing agitation in the patient. A standardized debrief was conducted with the assistance of child and adolescent mental health experts. Results: Twenty-two learners participated in this activity. Residents' confidence in their management skills of the acutely agitated pediatric patient significantly increased after completion of the activity. Seventy-three percent of learners felt confident or very confident in their de-escalation skills at the end of the case, and 86% agreed that the case improved their confidence in managing acute agitation scenarios on the inpatient wards. Discussion: This case led to overall increased self-efficacy in caring for the acutely agitated pediatric patient. Future iterations may include multidisciplinary learners of various skill levels and evaluating changes in patient-centered outcomes, such as restraint use, after implementation of the case.

Dietary protein level and source differentially affect bone metabolism, strength, and intestinal calcium transporter expression during ad libitum and food-restricted conditions in male rats.

High-protein (HP) diets may attenuate bone loss during energy restriction. The objective of the current study was to determine whether HP diets suppress bone turnover and improve bone quality in male rats during food restriction and whether dietary protein source affects this relation. Eighty 12-wk-old male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to consume 1 of 4 study diets under ad libitum (AL) control or restricted conditions [40% food restriction (FR)]: 1) 10% [normal-protein (NP)] milk protein; 2) 32% (HP) milk protein; 3) 10% (NP) soy protein; or 4) 32% (HP) soy protein. After 16 wk, markers of bone turnover, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), microarchitecture, strength, and expression of duodenal calcium channels were assessed. FR increased bone turnover and resulted in lower femoral trabecular bone volume (P < 0.05), higher cortical bone surface (P < 0.001), and reduced femur length (P < 0.01), bending moment (P < 0.05), and moment of inertia (P = 0.001) compared with AL. HP intake reduced bone turnover and tended to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) (P = 0.06) and increase trabecular vBMD (P < 0.05) compared with NP but did not affect bone strength. Compared with milk, soy suppressed PTH (P < 0.05) and increased cortical vBMD (P < 0.05) and calcium content of the femur (P < 0.01) but did not affect strength variables. During AL conditions, transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 6 was higher for soy than milk (P < 0.05) and HP compared with NP (P < 0.05). These data demonstrate that both HP and soy diets suppress PTH, and HP attenuates bone turnover and increases vBMD regardless of FR, although these differences do not affect bone strength. The effects of HP and soy may be due in part to enhanced intestinal calcium transporter expression.