Effect of albumin substitution on pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with severe burn injury admitted to the ICU.

BACKGROUND: Pathophysiological changes in severely burned patients alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anti-infective agents, potentially leading to subtherapeutic concentrations at the target site. Albumin supplementation, to support fluid resuscitation, may affect pharmacokinetic properties by binding drugs. This study aimed to investigate the PK of piperacillin/tazobactam in burn patients admitted to the ICU before and after albumin substitution as total and unbound concentrations in plasma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to the ICU and scheduled for 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam administration and 200 mL of 20% albumin substitution as part of clinical routine were included. Patients underwent IV microdialysis, and simultaneous arterial plasma sampling, at baseline and multiple timepoints after drug administration. PK analysis of total and unbound drug concentrations under steady-state conditions was performed before and after albumin supplementation. RESULTS: A total of seven patients with second- to third-degree burns involving 20%-60% of the total body surface were enrolled. Mean (SD) AUC0-8 (h·mg/L) of total piperacillin/tazobactam before and after albumin substitution were 402.1 (242)/53.2 (27) and 521.8 (363)/59.7 (32), respectively. Unbound mean AUC0-8 before and after albumin supplementation were 398.9 (204)/54.5 (25) and 456.4 (439)/64.5 (82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin supplementation had little impact on the PK of piperacillin/tazobactam. After albumin supplementation, there was a numerical increase in mean AUC0-8 of total and unbound piperacillin/tazobactam, whereas similar Cmax values were observed. Future studies may investigate the effect of albumin supplementation on drugs with a higher plasma protein binding.

Antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention of originator and generics of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: Although generic medicinal products are required to have the same qualitative and quantitative composition of the active substance as their reference originator product, patients and health care professionals express concerns about their interchangeability and safety. Therefore, the present study investigated the antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention of original and generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam against Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Two generic formulations of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam were tested against their respective originator products. Susceptibility testing was performed with twenty-one clinical isolates of S. aureus and ATCC-29213 using broth microdilution. Time kill curves (TKC) were performed with ATCC-29213 at drug concentrations above and below the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Mutation prevention concentration was determined for each drug formulation against ATCC-29213. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Mutant colonies from mutation prevention concentration (MPC) experiments were genotypically tested by sequence analysis. RESULTS: MIC ratios between contiguous originator and generic drugs were similar for each isolate. No visual differences were observed in TKCs between originator and generic substances. The MPC did not differ between different formulations of the same substance. Although sequence analysis of mutant colonies revealed genomic differences compared with the original ATCC-29213, no differences in mutation frequencies were observed between clinical isolates and ATCC-29213 treated with originator or generic substances. CONCLUSIONS: Similar antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention was observed between contiguous substances. These results support the interchangeability of generic and originator drug formulations with the same active ingredient.

Bacterial growth and ceftriaxone activity in individual ascitic fluids in an in vitro model of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Introduction: The environment of the infection site affects bacterial growth and antibiotic activity. When bacterial growth and antibiotic activity are studied in body fluids, samples of multiple subjects are usually pooled, averaging out potentially relevant differences in composition. The ascitic fluid (AF) environment is frequently associated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhotic patients. In this study, bacterial growth and ceftriaxone activity were evaluated in individual AF using an in vitro model of SBP, reflecting the environment and pharmacokinetics at the infection site. Methods: AF was obtained from nine cirrhotic patients with non-infected ascites. Growth of nine bacterial strains (three Escherichia coli, four Staphylococcus aureus, one Enterococcus faecalis, and one Klebsiella pneumoniae) in individual AF was assessed and correlated with biomarkers including potential risk factors for SBP. Ceftriaxone time-kill experiments, in which the pharmacokinetic profile observed in AF following a 1 g intravenous infusion was replicated, were performed with two E. coli and two S. aureus isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations around the ceftriaxone resistance breakpoint. Results: Significant correlations were found between bacterial growth and AF levels of protein (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ = -0.35), albumin (ρ = -0.31), and complement C3c (ρ = -0.28), and serum levels of bilirubin (ρ = 0.39) and aspartate aminotransferase (ρ = 0.25). Ceftriaxone was active in AF, even against resistant isolates, generally resulting in ≥2 log reductions in bacterial count within 24 h. Conclusion: Ascites patients may be predisposed to or protected against SBP based on the antimicrobial capacity of their AF. Ceftriaxone at clinical AF concentrations is active in the AF environment.

Consecutive Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) and Antigen Receptor (AR) PET Imaging Shows Positive Correlation with AR and PSMA Protein Expression in Primary Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer.

The present study was carried out to investigate whether PET imaging can be used as a potential substitute for immunohistochemical analysis of tumor samples in prostate cancer (PC) patients. Correlation between imaging signals of 2 PET tracers and the corresponding target structures was assessed. The first tracer was [68Ga]Ga-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen)-HBED-CC (N,N'-bis [2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid) [68Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC ([68Ga]PSMA), which is already implemented in clinical routines. The second tracer was 16ß-[18F]fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (16ß-[18F]FDHT), which binds to the androgen receptor (AR). The AR is particularly interesting in PC, because AR expression status and its shift during therapy might directly influence patient care. Methods: This prospective, explorative clinical study included 10 newly diagnosed PC patients. Each patient underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/MRI and [18F]FDHT PET/MRI scans before prostatectomy. Cancer SUVs were determined and related to background SUVs. After prostatectomy, tumor tissue was sampled, and AR and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression was determined. AR and PSMA expression was evaluated quantitatively with the open-source bioimage analysis software QuPath and with a 4-tier rating system. Correlation between imaging signals and marker expression was statistically assessed. Results: For [18F]FDHT, the SUVmax/SUVbackground ratio showed a significant, strong correlation (r = 0.72; P = 0.019) with the AR optical density of the correlating tissue sample. The correlation between PSMA optical density and the [68Ga]PSMA SUVmax/SUVbackground ratio was not significant (P = 0.061), yet a positive correlation trend could be observed (r = 0.61). SUVmax/SUVbackground ratios were higher for [68Ga]PSMA (mean ± SD, 34.9 ± 24.8) than for [18F]FDHT (4.8 ± 1.2). In line with these findings, the tumor detection rates were 90% for the [68Ga]PSMA PET scan but only 40% for the [18F]FDHT PET scan. The 4-tier rating of PSMA staining intensity yielded very homogeneous results, with values of 3+ for most subjects (90%). AR staining was rated as 1+ in 2 patients (20%), 2+ in 4 patients (40%), and 3+ in 4 patients (40%). Conclusion: [18F]FDHT PET may be useful for monitoring AR expression and alterations in AR expression during treatment of PC patients. This approach may facilitate early detection of treatment resistance and allows for adaptation of therapy to prevent cancer progression. [18F]FDHT PET is inferior to [68Ga]PSMA PET for primary PC diagnosis, but the correlation between [68Ga]PSMA SUVs and PSMA expression is weaker than that between [18F]FDHT and the AR.

Comparison of ultrafiltration and microdialysis for ceftriaxone protein-binding determination.

BACKGROUND: High protein binding (PB) of antibiotics has an impact on their antimicrobial activity. It has been questioned whether in vitro PB determination can capture the dynamic and concentration-dependent PB of highly bound antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: This clinical study compared in vitro ultrafiltration (UF) and in vivo IV microdialysis (MD) methods to determine ceftriaxone PB. METHODS: Six healthy male volunteers received a single IV 2 g dose of ceftriaxone. Unbound ceftriaxone plasma concentrations were measured with MD and venous plasma sampling with subsequent UF. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was used to quantify the PB. The PTA was estimated. RESULTS: The Cmax of ceftriaxone total plasma concentration (297.42 ±â€Š21.0 mg/L) was approximately 5.5-fold higher than for free concentrations obtained with UF (52.83 ±â€Š5.07 mg/L), and only 3.5-fold higher than for free concentrations obtained with MD (81.37 ±â€Š26.93 mg/L). Non-linear, saturable PB binding was confirmed for both UF and MD. Significantly different dissociation constants (Kd) for the albumin/ceftriaxone complex were quantified: in UF it was 23.7 mg/L (95% CI 21.3-26.2) versus 15.9 mg/L (95% CI 13.6-18.6) in MD. Moreover, the estimated number of binding sites (95% CI) per albumin molecule was 0.916 (0.86-0.97) in UF versus 0.548 in MD (0.51-0.59). The PTA obtained with MD was at most 27% higher than with UF. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro UF versus in vivo intravasal MD revealed significantly different PB, especially during the distribution phase. The method of PB determination could have an impact on the breakpoint determination and dose optimisation of antibiotics.

Effect of the human endotoxin challenge on tedizolid tissue penetration.

The effects of the human endotoxin challenge on tissue pharmacokinetics are unknown. In the present study, we aimed to assess the effect of the endotoxin challenge on interstitial fluid pharmacokinetics of tedizolid in healthy volunteers using intramuscular microdialysis. Eight healthy male subjects were treated with 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate for 6 days. On Day 6, an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (2 ng/kg body weight) was administered. LPS infusion did not affect plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. In contrast, following LPS infusion, median muscle tissue fAUC (0.83 [0.75-1.15] vs. 1.14 [1.11-1.43] mg × h/L, P = .0078) and muscle tissue fCmax (0.15 [0.14-0.19] vs. 0.19 [0.18-0.24] mg/L, P = .0078) were significantly increased by 38% and 24%, respectively. The human endotoxin challenge was associated with increased tissue concentrations of tedizolid, without affecting its plasma concentration-time profile. The human endotoxin challenge combined with microdialysis may be used to investigate the influence of systemic inflammation on tissue pharmacokinetics.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and stability of generics of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs: an intravenous bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and quality of generic antibacterial drug formulations are often questioned by both healthcare specialists and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the interchangeability of generic drugs with their originators by comparing bioequivalence parameters and stability data of generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study, three groups of 12 healthy volunteers each received a single intravenous infusion of either 2 g of cefepime or 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam and two generic formulations, or 600 mg of linezolid and one generic formulation. Plasma sampling was performed, with a 5 day washout period between study days. Stability was tested by storing reconstituted generic and originator products according to their own storage specifications and those of the comparator products. All concentrations were measured by LC-MS. RESULTS: Similar ratios of generic/originator (90% CI) Cmax were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [93.7 (88.4-99.4)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [95.9 (89.1-103.2)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [104.5 (91.1-119.9)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [95.9 (90.4-101.7)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.7 (84.9-104.7)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [93.4 (87.4-99.8)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [97.4 (89.7-105.8)]. Accordingly, similar ratios of AUC0-t were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [91.1 (87.6-94.8)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [97.9 (92.5-103.5)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [99.7 (93.3-106.6)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [92.2 (88.3-96.3)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.9 (97.0-102.8)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [91.4 (86.4-96.7)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [98.8 (94.3-103.6)]. Stable and similar concentrations were measured for all contiguous substances, regardless of storage conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their respective originator drugs, generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam met the predetermined bioequivalence criteria. All formulations were stable under the storage conditions of their respective comparators.

Binding of temocillin to plasma proteins in vitro and in vivo: the importance of plasma protein levels in different populations and of co-medications.

BACKGROUND: Temocillin plasma protein binding (PPB) in healthy individuals is reported to be ∼85% but had not been studied in patients. OBJECTIVES: To obtain normative data on temocillin PPB in patients in relation to infection and impact of co-medications widely used in ICU. METHODS: Plasma was obtained from healthy individuals (Group #1), non-ICU patients with UTI (Group #2), ICU patients with suspected/confirmed ventriculitis (Group #3) or with sepsis/septic shock (Group #4). Total and unbound temocillin concentrations were measured in spiked samples from temocillin-naive donors (in vitro) or in plasma from temocillin-treated subjects (in vivo). The impact of diluting plasma, using pharmaceutical albumin, or adding drugs potentially competing for PPB was tested in spiked samples. Data were analysed using a modified Hill-Langmuir equation taking ligand depletion into account. RESULTS: Temocillin PPB was saturable in all groups, both in vitro and in vivo. Maximal binding capacity (Bmax) was 1.2-2-fold lower in patients. At 20 and 200 mg/L (total concentrations), the unbound fraction reached 12%-29%, 23%-42% and 32%-52% in Groups #2, #3, #4. The unbound fraction was inversely correlated with albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Binding to albumin was 2-3-fold lower than in plasma and non-saturable. Drugs with high PPB but active at lower molar concentrations than temocillin caused minimal displacement, while fluconazole (low PPB but similar plasma concentrations to temocillin) increased up to 2-fold its unbound fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Temocillin PPB is saturable, 2-4-fold lowered in infected patients in relation to disease severity (ICU admission, hypoalbuminaemia, inflammation) and only partially reproducible with albumin. Competition with other drugs must be considered for therapeutic concentrations to be meaningful.

Influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the endotoxin challenge in healthy volunteers: a cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggested anti-inflammatory properties of tedizolid. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the human endotoxin challenge and the effect of endotoxaemia on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tedizolid. METHODS: In this cross-over trial, 14 male healthy volunteers underwent two treatment periods: (A) 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate once daily for 6 days (3 days orally and 3 days intravenously), followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg body weight of LPS on the last treatment day; and (B) intravenous bolus of LPS (2 ng/kg body weight) without concomitant tedizolid treatment. Participants underwent first period A or B, separated by at least 6 weeks. Plasma was sampled to assess cytokines and the pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. RESULTS: Following the endotoxin challenge, the peak plasma concentration (median [IQR]; 280 [155-502] versus 287 [132-541]  pg/mL; P = 0.875) and AUC0-24 (979 [676-1319] versus 1000 [647-1632]  pg·h/mL; P = 0.638) of interleukin-6 remained unchanged with and without concomitant tedizolid treatment. The peak concentration and AUC0-24 of TNF-α remained also unchanged with and without tedizolid (47 [31-61] versus 54 [27-69]  pg/mL; P = 0.73 and 197 [163-268] versus 234 [146-280]  pg·h/mL; P = 0.875, respectively). The total maximum concentration (mean ± SD; 2.94 ± 0.69 versus 2.96 ± 0.62 mg/L), total AUC0-24 (22.3 ± 3.8 versus 21.1 ± 3.6 mg·h/L) and protein binding (21.4% ± 1.7% versus 21.6% ± 1.9%) of tedizolid were similar with and without the endotoxin challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid did not attenuate the LPS-induced cytokine response in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, endotoxaemia did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid.

Microdosing as a Potential Tool to Enhance Clinical Development of Novel Antibiotics: A Tissue and Plasma PK Feasibility Study with Ciprofloxacin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In microdose studies, drug pharmacokinetics is measured in humans after administration of subtherapeutic doses. While previous microdose studies focused primarily on plasma pharmacokinetics, we set out to evaluate the feasibility of microdosing for a pharmacokinetic assessment in subcutaneous tissue and epithelial lining fluid. METHODS: Healthy subjects received a single intravenous bolus injection of a microdose of [14C]ciprofloxacin (1.1 µg, 7 kBq) with (cohort A, n = 9) or without (cohort B, n = 9) a prior intravenous infusion of a therapeutic dose of unlabeled ciprofloxacin (400 mg). Microdialysis and bronchoalveolar lavage were applied for determination of subcutaneous and intrapulmonary drug concentrations. Microdose [14C]ciprofloxacin was quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry and therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin (cohort A) in plasma, subcutaneous tissue, and epithelial lining fluid was in accordance with previous data. In plasma and subcutaneous tissue, the dose-adjusted area under the concentration-time curve of microdose ciprofloxacin was similar in cohorts A and B and within an 0.8-fold to 1.1-fold range of the area under the concentration-time curve of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into subcutaneous tissue was similar in cohorts A and B and comparable to that of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin with subcutaneous tissue-to-plasma area under the concentration-time curve ratios of 0.44, 0.44, and 0.38, respectively. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into epithelial lining fluid was highly variable and failed to predict the epithelial lining fluid penetration of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility of microdosing for pharmacokinetic measurements in plasma and subcutaneous tissue. Microdosing combined with microdialysis is a potentially useful tool in clinical antimicrobial drug development, but its applicability for the assessment of pulmonary pharmacokinetics with bronchoalveolar lavage requires further studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03177720 (registered 6 June, 2017).

Meropenem concentrations in brain tissue of neurointensive care patients exceed CSF levels.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate antibiotic exposure in cerebral infections might have detrimental effects on clinical outcome. Commonly, antibiotic concentrations within the CSF were used to estimate cerebral target levels. However, the actual pharmacological active unbound drug concentration beyond the blood-brain barrier is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare meropenem concentrations in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate of neurointensive care patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 12 patients suffering subarachnoid haemorrhage, 2000 mg of meropenem was administered every 8 h due to an extracerebral infection. Meropenem concentrations were determined in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate at steady state (n = 11) and following single-dose administration (n = 5). RESULTS: At steady state, the free AUC0-8 was 233.2 ± 42.7 mg·h/L in plasma, 7.8 ± 1.9 mg·h/L in CSF and 26.6 ± 14.0 mg·h/L in brain tissue. The brain tissue penetration ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma) was 0.11 ± 0.06, which was more than 3 times higher than in CSF (0.03 ± 0.01), resulting in an AUCCSF/AUCbrain ratio of 0.41 ± 0.16 at steady state. After single-dose administration similar proportions were achieved (AUCbrain/AUCplasma = 0.09 ± 0.08; AUCCSF/AUCplasma = 0.02 ± 0.00). Brain tissue concentrations correlated well with CSF concentrations (R = 0.74, P < 0.001), but only moderately with plasma concentrations (R = 0.51, P < 0.001). Bactericidal thresholds were achieved in both plasma and brain tissue for MIC values ≤16 mg/L. In CSF, bactericidal effects were only reached for MIC values ≤1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem achieves sufficient bactericidal concentrations for the most common bacterial strains of cerebral infections in both plasma and brain tissue, even in non-inflamed brain tissue. CSF concentrations would highly underestimate the target site activity of meropenem beyond the blood-brain barrier.

Microdialysis as a potential tool for comparative assessment of tissue pharmacokinetics of two different patches containing lidocaine: A crossover pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Lidocaine 5% patches are approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in adults. Little information is available on the penetration of lidocaine into skin and skin-related soft tissue, which are thought to be closer to the site where lidocaine exerts its pharmacological action on neuronal structures. This pilot study investigated subcutaneous and systemic pharmacokinetics of lidocaine during topical application of two different lidocaine 5% patches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized two-way, two-period crossover study assessed lidocaine concentrations in subcutaneous tissue (by microdialysis) and plasma of n = 5 healthy subjects during 12-hour-long applications of a recently developed lidocaine 5% patch (Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, SA, Barcelona, Spain) and a marketed reference patch (Versatis 5% lidocaine patch, Grünenthal, Brunn am Gebirge, Austria), respectively. RESULTS: Lidocaine was detectable in subcutaneous tissue within 60 minutes from start of patch application, and in plasma only after a marked delay. The test formulation led to increased exposure to lidocaine in both subcutaneous tissue and plasma. CONCLUSION: This study has underscored the potential of microdialysis to comparatively assess the pharmacokinetics of two different drug formulations and encourages its further use in this area.

A phase I study assessing the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering activity of immunotherapeutics targeting PCSK9.

PURPOSE: AT04A and AT06A are two AFFITOPE® peptide vaccine candidates being developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia by inducing proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-specific antibodies. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, antibody development, and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) following four subcutaneous immunizations. METHODS: This phase I, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in a total of 72 healthy subjects with a mean fasting LDLc level at baseline of 117.1 mg/dL (range 77-196 mg/dL). Each cohort enrolled 24 subjects to receive three priming immunizations at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and to receive a single booster immunization at week 60 of either AT04A, AT06A, or placebo. In addition to safety (primary objective), the antigenic peptide- and PCSK9-specific antibody response and the impact on LDLc were evaluated over a period of 90 weeks. RESULTS: The most common systemic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported were fatigue, headache, and myalgia in 75% of subjects in the AT06A group and 58% and 46% of subjects in the placebo and AT04A groups, respectively. Injection site reactions (ISR) representing 63% of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), were transient and mostly of mild or moderate intensity and rarely severe (3%). Both active treatments triggered a robust, long-lasting antibody response towards the antigenic peptides used for immunization that optimally cross-reacted with the target epitope on PCSK9. In the AT04A group, a reduction in serum LDLc was observed with a mean peak reduction of 11.2% and 13.3% from baseline compared to placebo at week 20 and 70 respectively, and over the whole study period, the mean LDLc reduction for the AT04A group vs. placebo was -7.2% (95% CI [-10.4 to -3.9], P < 0.0001). In this group, PCSK9 target epitope titers above 50 were associated with clinically relevant LDLc reductions with an individual maximal decrease of 39%. CONCLUSIONS: Although both AT04A and AT06 were safe and immunogenic, only AT04A demonstrated significant LDLc-lowering activity, justifying further development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2015-001719-11. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02508896.

Protein binding of clindamycin in vivo by means of intravascular microdialysis in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of an anti-infective drug is influenced by its protein binding (PB), since only the free fraction is active. We hypothesized that PB may vary in vitro and in vivo, and used clindamycin, a drug with high and concentration-dependent PB to investigate this hypothesis. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers received a single intravenous infusion of clindamycin 900 mg. Antibiotic plasma concentrations were obtained by blood sampling and unbound drug concentrations were determined by means of in vivo intravascular microdialysis (MD) or in vitro ultrafiltration (UF) for up to 8 h post dosing. Clindamycin was assayed in plasma and MD fluid using a validated HPLC-UV (ultraviolet) method. Non-linear mixed effects modelling in NONMEM® was used to quantify the PB in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: C max was 14.95, 3.39 and 2.32 mg/L and AUC0-8h was 41.78, 5.80 and 6.14 mg·h/L for plasma, ultrafiltrate and microdialysate, respectively. Calculated ratio of AUCunbound/AUCtotal showed values of 13.9%±1.8% and 14.7%±3.1% for UF and microdialysate, respectively. Modelling confirmed non-linear, saturable PB for clindamycin with slightly different median (95% CI) dissociation constants (Kd) for the alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG)-clindamycin complex of 1.16 mg/L (0.91-1.37) in vitro versus 0.85 mg/L (0.58-1.01) in vivo. Moreover, the estimated number of binding sites per AAG molecule was 2.07 (1.79-2.25) in vitro versus 1.66 in vivo (1.41-1.79). CONCLUSIONS: Concentration-dependent PB was observed for both investigated methods with slightly lower levels of unbound drug fractions in vitro as compared with in vivo.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Fosfomycin after Continuous Infusion Compared with Intermittent Infusion: a Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Continuous infusion (CON) of fosfomycin has been proposed as potentially advantageous in certain clinical scenarios. However, no clinical data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fosfomycin after CON are available to date. This study aimed to investigate the PK of fosfomycin after CON and compare it with intermittent infusion (INT) of fosfomycin. A randomized two-way crossover study including 8 healthy male volunteers was performed. Each subject received fosfomycin as INT of 8 g over 30 min every 8 h and, separated by a washout period, as CON of 1 g/h preceded by a loading dose of 8 g over 30 min. PK sampling was performed for 18 and 24 h in the CON and INT groups, respectively. Fosfomycin was generally well tolerated. However, 2 out of 8 subjects (25%) developed thrombophlebitis at the infusion site following CON, which was prevented in the following subjects with a simultaneous coinfusion of Ringer's lactate. The steady-state maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUCSS,0-24) of fosfomycin after INT were 551.5 ± 67.8 mg/liter and 3,678.5 ± 601.9 h · mg/liter, respectively. CON led to an average steady-state concentration of 183.8 ± 35.9 mg/liter, resulting in a calculated AUCSS,0-24 of 4,411.2 ± 862.4 h · mg/liter, which was 1.2-fold higher than that with INT. CON resulted in a 100% T>MIC (time during which the drug concentration exceeds the MIC) for MICs of ≤128 mg/liter, whereas the %T>MIC for INT was only 44% for an MIC of 128 mg/liter. CON of fosfomycin led to improved PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants in plasma of healthy volunteers. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated in patients.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of temocillin in plasma and soft tissues of healthy volunteers after intravenous and subcutaneous administration: a randomized crossover microdialysis trial.

BACKGROUND: The antibiotic temocillin has recently been rediscovered as a promising therapeutic option against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. However, some aspects of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the drug are still to be elucidated: subcutaneous administration of temocillin might be of interest as an alternative to the intravenous route in selected patients. Similarly, information on the penetration of temocillin into human soft tissues is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and plasma PK of subcutaneous dosing as well as soft tissue PK of temocillin after intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers received 2 g of temocillin both as intravenous and subcutaneous infusion in a randomized two-period crossover study. Concentration-time profiles of total temocillin in plasma (after both routes) and of unbound temocillin in plasma, muscle and subcutis (only after intravenous dosing) were determined up to 12 h post-dose. RESULTS: Subcutaneous dosing caused some infusion site discomfort but resulted in sustained drug concentrations over time with only slightly decreased overall exposure compared with intravenous dosing. Plasma protein binding of temocillin showed concentration-dependent behaviour and was higher than previously reported. Still, unbound drug concentrations in muscle and subcutis determined by microdialysis markedly exceeded those in plasma, suggesting good tissue penetration of temocillin. CONCLUSIONS: The subcutaneous administration of temocillin is a valid and feasible alternative to intravenous dosing. With the description of plasma protein binding and soft tissue PK of temocillin in healthy volunteers, this study provides important information that adds to the ongoing characterization of the PK profile of temocillin and might serve as input for PK/PD considerations.

Determination of free clindamycin, flucloxacillin or tedizolid in plasma: Pay attention to physiological conditions when using ultrafiltration.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of anti-infective drugs should be referenced to free drug concentrations. In the present study, clindamycin, flucloxacillin and tedizolid have been determined in human plasma by HPLC-UV. The drugs were separated isocratically within 3-6 min on a C18 column using mixtures of phosphate buffer-acetonitrile of pH 7.1-7.2. Sample treatment for the determination of total drug concentrations in plasma included extraction/back-extraction (clindamycin) or protein precipitation (flucloxacillin, tedizolid). The free drug concentrations were determined after ultrafiltration. An ultrafiltration device with a membrane consisting of regenerated cellulose proved to be suitable for all drugs. Maintaining a physiological pH was crucial for clindamycin, whereas maintaining body temperature was essential for tedizolid. The methods were applied to the analysis of total and free drug concentrations in clinical samples and were sufficiently sensitive for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Measurement of Hepatic ABCB1 and ABCG2 Transport Activity with [11C]Tariquidar and PET in Humans and Mice.

P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) in the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes mediate the biliary excretion of drugs and drug metabolites. To measure hepatic ABCB1 and ABCG2 activity, we performed positron emission tomography (PET) scans with the ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate [11C]tariquidar in healthy volunteers and wild-type, Abcb1a/b(-/-), Abcg2(-/-), and Abcb1a/b(-/-)Abcg2(-/-) mice without and with coadministration of unlabeled tariquidar. PET data were analyzed with a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. [11C]Tariquidar underwent hepatobiliary excretion in both humans and mice, and tariquidar coadministration caused a significant reduction in the rate constant for the transfer of radioactivity from the liver into bile (by -74% in humans and by -62% in wild-type mice), suggesting inhibition of canalicular efflux transporter activity. Radio-thin-layer chromatography analysis revealed that the majority of radioactivity (>87%) in the mouse liver and bile was composed of unmetabolized [11C]tariquidar. PET data in transporter knockout mice revealed that both ABCB1 and ABCG2 mediated biliary excretion of [11C]tariquidar. In vitro experiments indicated that tariquidar is not a substrate of major hepatic basolateral uptake transporters (SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, SLCO2B1, SLC22A1, and SLC22A3). Our data suggest that [11C]tariquidar can be used to measure hepatic canalicular ABCB1/ABCG2 transport activity without a confounding effect of uptake transporters.

Assessment of brain delivery of a model ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate in patients with non-contrast-enhancing brain tumors with positron emission tomography.

BACKGROUND: P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) are two efflux transporters expressed at the blood-brain barrier which effectively restrict the brain distribution of the majority of currently known anticancer drugs. High-grade brain tumors often possess a disrupted blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB) leading to enhanced accumulation of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents, and possibly anticancer drugs, as compared to normal brain. In contrast to high-grade brain tumors, considerably less information is available with respect to BBTB integrity in lower grade brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed positron emission tomography imaging with the radiolabeled ABCB1 inhibitor [11C]tariquidar, a prototypical ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate, in seven patients with non-contrast -enhancing brain tumors (WHO grades I-III). In addition, ABCB1 and ABCG2 levels were determined in surgically resected tumor tissue of four patients using quantitative targeted absolute proteomics. RESULTS: Brain distribution of [11C]tariquidar was found to be very low across the whole brain and not significantly different between tumor and tumor-free brain tissue. Only one patient showed a small area of enhanced [11C]tariquidar uptake within the brain tumor. ABCG2/ABCB1 ratios in surgically resected tumor tissue (1.4 ± 0.2) were comparable to previously reported ABCG2/ABCB1 ratios in isolated human micro-vessels (1.3), which suggested that no overexpression of ABCB1 or ABCG2 occurred in the investigated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the investigated brain tumors had an intact BBTB, which is impermeable to anticancer drugs, which are dual ABCB1/ABCG2 substrates. Therefore, effective drugs for antitumor treatment should have high passive permeability and lack ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate affinity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EUDRACT), 2011-004189-13. Registered on 23 February 2012, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2011-004189-13.

Towards Improved Pharmacokinetic Models for the Analysis of Transporter-Mediated Hepatic Disposition of Drug Molecules with Positron Emission Tomography.

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with radiolabeled drugs holds great promise to assess the influence of membrane transporters on hepatobiliary clearance of drugs. To exploit the full potential of PET, quantitative pharmacokinetic models are required. In this study, we evaluated the suitability of different compartment models to describe the hepatic disposition of [11C]erlotinib as a small-molecule model drug which undergoes transporter-mediated hepatobiliary excretion. We analyzed two different, previously published data sets in healthy volunteers, in which a baseline [11C]erlotinib PET scan was followed by a second PET scan either after oral intake of unlabeled erlotinib (300 mg) or after intravenous infusion of the prototypical organic anion-transporting polypeptide inhibitor rifampicin (600 mg). We assessed a three-compartment (3C) and a four-compartment (4C) model, in which either a sampled arterial blood input function or a mathematically derived dual input function (DIF), which takes the contribution of the portal vein to the liver blood supply into account, was used. Both models provided acceptable fits of the observed PET data in the liver and extrahepatic bile duct and gall bladder. Changes in model outcome parameters between scans were consistent with the involvement of basolateral hepatocyte uptake and canalicular efflux transporters in the hepatobiliary clearance of [11C]erlotinib. Our results demonstrated that inclusion of a DIF did not lead to substantial improvements in model fits. The models developed in this work represent a step forward in applying PET as a tool to assess the impact of hepatic transporters on drug disposition and their involvement in drug-drug interactions.