Network Pharmacology Analysis on the Mechanism of Xihuangwan in Treating Rectal Cancer and Radiation Enteritis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that XihuangWan (XHW) is a kind of Chinese medicine with significant anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory activities. However, its mechanism for preventing and treating radiation proctitis in rectal cancer patients during radiotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: This study employed the network pharmacology to establish a "drug-active ingredient-target genedisease" network via using TCMSP, SymMap, GeneCard, and OMIM databases. The PPI network was conducted by the String tool. The core targets of XHW in the treatment of rectal cancer and radiation enteritis were identified by topological analysis, and the functional annotation analysis and pathway enrichment analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 61 active ingredients of XHW ingredients, 4607 rectal cancer-related genes, 5803 radiation enteritis-related genes, and 68 common targets of XHW in the treatment of rectal cancer and radiation enteritis were obtained. PTGS1 and NR3C2, as identified potential targets, were significantly associated with OS of colorectal cancer patients. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that bioinformatics annotation of these common genes was mainly involved in DNA-binding transcription factor, PI3K/Akt, TNF, HIF-1 signaling pathway, and colorectal cancer pathway. CONCLUSION: The active ingredients of XHW, mainly including Quercetin, Ellagic acid, and Stigmasterol, might act on common targets of rectal cancer and radiation enteritis, such as PTGS1, NR3C2, IL-6, EGFR, HIF-1A, CASP3, BCL2, ESR1, MYC, and PPARG, and regulate multiple signaling pathways like PI3K-Akt, TNF, and HIF-1 to inhibit tumor proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress, thereby achieving prevention and treatment of radiation enteritis in rectal cancer patients during radiotherapy. It provided an important reference for further elucidating the anti-inflammation and anti-tumor mechanism and clinical application of XHW.

Dosimetric evaluation of different aperture shape controller parameters based on the Halcyon 3.0 accelerator in the hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective:To evaluate the dosimetric effects of different aperture shape controller (ASC) parameters based on the Halcyon 3.0 accelerator in the hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) plans.Methods:This study enrolled 13 patients treated with WBRT using a Halcyon 3.0 accelerator at the Department of Radiotherapy of the Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. According to different aperture shape controller (ASC) parameters, the HA-WBRT plans were divided into six groups, namely non, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high ASC settings, marked by AO, AVL, AL, AM, AH, and AVH, respectively. This study presented a statistical evaluation of the effects of different ASC parameters on conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), radiation doses to the hippocampus and other organs at risk, and the plans’ execution efficiency. Furthermore, using two dose verification tools, namely ArcCHECK and Portal Dosimetry, this study delivered a comprehensive analysis of the differences in beam delivery precision of the plans with different ASC parameters.Results:The six groups all met the requirements for clinical treatment. They had similar CI and HI values, with no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05). The AVH group showed better protection effects on organs at risk. Compared to the control group, the AVL group showed lower Dmax of brainstems but higher Dmax of chiasma opticum ( F = 6.26, 8.04, P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, the AH group showed lower Dmax of eyeballs but higher Dmax of optic nerves ( F = 2.04, 1.37, P < 0.05). In contrast, the AVH group exhibited lower Dmax of brainstems, eyeballs, and lens than the control group ( F = 6.26, 2.04, 2.02, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in dosimetric indices of other organs at risk ( P > 0.05). As verified using ArcCHECK and Portal Dosimetry, the γ passing rates of the six groups were over 98% at 2%/2 mm and 100% at 3%/3 mm. The overall γ passing rates verified using ArcCHECK were lower than those verified using Portal Dosimetry. The maximum difference in the monitor unit among the six groups was less than 15, and these groups did not show significant differences in terms of execution efficiency. Conclusions:The HA-WBRT plans based on the Halcyon 3.0 accelerator can meet the requirements for clinical treatment. Different ASC parameters can significantly optimize the dosimetric parameters. Among them, the AVH parameters can highly reduce the radiation dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, different ASC parameters show insignificant effects on beam delivery precision and plan execution efficiency, meeting the verification standards for clinical therapeutic doses.