A single-center study on the distribution and antibiotic resistance of pathogens causing bloodstream infection in patients with hematological malignancies / 中华血液学杂志

Objective: To study the incidence of bloodstream infections, pathogen distribution, and antibiotic resistance profile in patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, pathogen distribution, and antibiotic resistance profiles of patients with malignant hematological diseases and bloodstream infections in the Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Results: A total of 582 incidences of bloodstream infections occurred in 22,717 inpatients. From 2018 to 2021, the incidence rates of bloodstream infections were 2.79%, 2.99%, 2.79%, and 2.02%, respectively. Five hundred ninety-nine types of bacteria were recovered from blood cultures, with 487 (81.3%) gram-negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty-one (13.5%) were gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecium, whereas the remaining 31 (5.2%) were fungi. Enterobacteriaceae resistance to carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, and tigecycline were 11.0%, 15.3%, 15.4%, and 3.3%, with a descending trend year on year. Non-fermenters tolerated piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, and quinolones at 29.6%, 13.3%, and 21.7%, respectively. However, only two gram-positive bacteria isolates were shown to be resistant to glycopeptide antibiotics. Conclusions: Bloodstream pathogens in hematological malignancies were broadly dispersed, most of which were gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotic resistance rates vary greatly between species. Our research serves as a valuable resource for the selection of empirical antibiotics.

The prognostic value of the international prognostic index, the national comprehensive cancer network IPI and the age-adjusted IPI in diffuse large B cell lymphoma / 中华血液学杂志

Objective: To explore the prognostic value of the international prognostic index (IPI), the national comprehensive cancer network IPI(NCCN-IPI)and the age-adjusted IPI (aa-IPI) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Methods: A total of 311 patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) diagnosed from 2003 to 2012 in Nanfang hospital were included. All patients were divided into CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone) and R-CHOP (rituximab, CHOP) groups. Survival analysis was compared among IPI, NCCN-IPI and aa-IPI models. Discrimination of three different prognostic models was assessed using the Harrell's C statistic. Results: A total of 311 patients were analyzed. Among them, 128 patients were treated with CHOP regimen and other 183 patients were treated with R-CHOP regimen. In CHOP groups, both NCCN-IPI (5-year OS: 59.7% vs 26.8%, P<0.001) and aa-IPI (5-year OS: 71.0% vs 25.0%, P<0.001) showed better risk stratification for low-intermediate and high-intermediate group than the IPI (5-year OS: 47.6% vs 36.6%, P=0.003). However, in the patients treated with R-CHOP, NCCN-IPI showed better risk stratification in low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate groups (5-year OS: 96.0% vs 83.0% vs 66.5%, P=0.009). According to the Harrell's C statistic, C-index of IPI, NCCN-IPI and aa-IPI for overall survival (OS) were 0.546, 0.667, 0.698 in CHOP group and 0.611,0.654, 0.695 in R-CHOP group respectively. In patients younger than 60 years old, C-index of IPI, NCCN-IPI and aa-IPI for OS were 0.534, 0.675, 0.698 in CHOP group and 0.584, 0.648, 0.695 in R-CHOP respectively. Conclusion: The NCCN-IPI is more powerful than IPI and aa-IPI in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP. aa-IPI is a preferable model in predicting prognosis than IPI and NCCN-IPI in anthracycline-based chemotherapy without rituximab.

Influence of L-asaraginase and Pegaspargase on Coagulation Function of Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Analysis of Related Factors / 中国实验血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the coagulation function and relevant factors of adults patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with pegasparase (PEG-ASP) or L-asaraginase (L-ASP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical features of 153 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received L-ASP or PEG-ASP in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2015 year were analyzed retrospectively. Among 153 patients, 108 patients received L-ASP treatment and 45 patients received PEG-ASP treatment. The change of coagulation function and the incidence of complications of 2 treated groups were compared, and the influence of differenent using time of L-ASP on above mentioned factors were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The age, sex, white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis, subtype and risk factors of disease, total effective rate and complication rates showed no significant difference in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The total infusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen (FIB) also showed no significant difference (P = 0.12, 0.65, 0.09). FIB levels decreased slower after treatment of PEG-ASP (9.49 vs 6.90) (P = 0.000) than that after treatment of L-ASP. When L-ASP used at interval, FIB level decreased slower than that of continuous use. However, the risk of bleeding is higher when used at interval early (P = 0.01, 0.013).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Using PEG-ASP can better monitor the coagulation function than L-ASP. L-ASP used at interval can monitor the coagulation function easily, but its early use may cause an increased incidence of complications.</p>