RESUMEN
Age prediction is an important aspect of forensic science that offers valuable insight into identification. In recent years, extensive studies have been conducted on age prediction based on DNA methylation, and numerous studies have demonstrated that DNA methylation is a reliable biomarker for age prediction. However, almost all studies on age prediction based on DNA methylation have focused on age-related CpG sites in autosomes, which are concentrated on single-source DNA samples. Mixed samples, especially male-female mixed samples, are common in forensic casework. The application of Y-STRs and Y-SNPs can provide clues for the genetic typing of male individuals in male-female mixtures, but they cannot provide the age information of male individuals. Studies on Y-chromosome DNA methylation can address this issue. In this study, we identified five age-related CpG sites on the Y chromosome (Y-CpGs) and developed a male-specific age prediction model using pyrosequencing combined with a support vector machine algorithm. The mean absolute deviation of the model was 5.50 years in the training set and 6.74 years in the testing set. When we used a male blood sample to predict age, the deviation between the predicted and chronological age was 1.18 years. Then, we mixed the genomic DNA of the male and a female at ratios of 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, and 1:50, the range of deviation between the predicted and chronological age of the male in the mixture was 1.16-1.74 years. In addition, there was no significant difference between the methylation values of bloodstains and blood in the same sample, which indicates that our model is also suitable for bloodstain samples. Overall, our results show that age prediction using DNA methylation of the Y chromosome has potential applications in forensic science and can be of great help in predicting the age of males in male-female mixtures. Furthermore, this work lays the foundation for future research on age-related applications of Y-CpGs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The coronal plane is the unique display mode of automated breast (AB) ultrasound (US), which has valuable features of showing the entire breast anatomy and providing additional diagnostic value for breast lesions. However, whether adding the coronal plane could improve the diagnostic performance in screening breast cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the value of adding the coronal plane in interpretation for AB US screening. METHODS: In this retrospective study, AB US images from 644 women (396 in the no-finding group, 143 with benign lesions, and 105 with malignant lesions) aged 40-70 years were collected between January 2016 and October 2020. Four novice radiologists (with 1-5 years of experience with breast US) and four experienced radiologists (with >5 years of experience with breast US) were assigned to read all AB US images in the transverse plane plus coronal plane (T + C planes) and transverse plane (T plane) alone in separate reading sessions. Diagnostic performance, lesion conspicuity, and reading time were compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean reading time of all radiologists was significantly shorter in the T + C planes reading mode than in the T plane alone (115 ± 32 vs 128 ± 31 s, respectively; P < .05), and cancers had a higher conspicuity (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-3.08; P = .04). No significant differences were noted in the two reading modes (T + C planes vs T plane) in the sensitivity (82% [95% CI, 74-89%] vs 81% [95% CI, 74-88%], respectively; P = .68) and specificity (68% [95% CI, 62-75%] vs 70% [95% CI, 64-75%], respectively; P = .39) when Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 was set as the threshold. There were also no significant differences in the two reading modes (T + C planes vs T plane) in the sensitivity (70% [95% CI, 64-76%] vs 69% [95% CI, 63-75%], respectively; P = .39) and specificity (91% [95% CI, 87-96%] vs 91% [95% CI, 88-95%], respectively; P = .90) when BI-RADS 4 was set as the threshold. In addition, the mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of all radiologists in the two reading modes (T + C planes vs T plane) were not significantly different (0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.89] vs 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.89], respectively; P = .61). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a coronal plane in the AB US screening setting saved the reading time and improved the conspicuity of breast cancers but not the diagnostic performance.
