RESUMEN
Over two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 during the active disease phase has been extensively studied. However, the long-term impact after recovery, which is critical to advance our understanding SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19-associated long-term complications, remains largely unknown. Herein, we characterized multi-omic single-cell profiles of circulating immune cells in the peripheral blood of 100 patients, including covenlesent COVID-19 and sero-negative controls. The reduced frequencies of both short-lived monocytes and long-lived regulatory T (Treg) cells are significantly associated with the patients recovered from severe COVID-19. Consistently, sc-RNA seq analysis reveals seven heterogeneous clusters of monocytes (M0-M6) and ten Treg clusters (T0-T9) featuring distinct molecular signatures and associated with COVID-19 severity. Asymptomatic patients contain the most abundant clusters of monocyte and Treg expressing high CD74 or IFN-responsive genes. In contrast, the patients recovered from a severe disease have shown two dominant inflammatory monocyte clusters with S100 family genes: S100A8 & A9 with high HLA-I whereas S100A4 & A6 with high HLA-II genes, a specific non-classical monocyte cluster with distinct IFITM family genes, and a unique TGF-{beta} high Treg Cluster. The outpatients and seronegative controls share most of the monocyte and Treg clusters patterns with high expression of HLA genes. Surprisingly, while presumably short-ived monocytes appear to have sustained alterations over 4 months, the decreased frequencies of long-lived Tregs (high HLA-DRA and S100A6) in the outpatients restore over the tested convalescent time (>= 4 months). Collectively, our study identifies sustained and dynamically altered monocytes and Treg clusters with distinct molecular signatures after recovery, associated with COVID-19 severity.
RESUMEN
PurposeTo investigate the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the detection of focal liver lesions (FLL).Materials and Methods T2WI, dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) and DWI (b=100 s/mm2 and 600 s/mm2 respectively) were performed in 205 patients with 310 FLLs. All images were read by two reviewers to determine the detection of FLLs and score the confidence. The consistency of the results given by the two reviewers was evaluated. The confidence scores between different sequences and the detection rate of different sequences were also compared.Results The consistency of the two reviewers was excellent or good in T2WI, high b value DWI, low b value DWI, and DCE (Kappa=0.71, 0.85, 0.82 and 0.64,P0.05), but higher than T2WI (P<0.01). The combination of DWI and DCE detected more small malignant lesions than DWI or DCE alone (P<0.01).Conclusion DWI can detect more FLLs than T2WI, and can help DCE detect small malignant FLLs. Therefore DWI is suggested to be included in the routine protocol of liver MRI examination.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of primary gallbladder cancer with liver invasion and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with gallbladder invasion. Methods From January 2009 to October 2010, 11 patients with primary gallbladder cancer and 19 patients with primary HCC were admitted to the PLA General Hospital. The clinical data of the 30 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with b value of 800 s/mm2, and the receiver operating curve (ROC) was drawn. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the patients with gallbladder cancer and HCC were compared by independent sample t test. Results Thirty tumors were detected in the 30 patients. All tumors showed high signal on DWI, slightly low signal on T1 WI and slightly high signal on T2 WI. The foci of 11 patients with primary gallbladder cancer were at the gallbladder fossa, and 10 of them had liver involvement. The mean ADC value of the 11 patients was (0.89 ±0. 14)mm2/s. Of the 19 patients with primary HCC, the foci of 15 patients were at the right lobe of liver, and 4were at the left lobe. The mean ADC value of the 19 patients was (1.04 ±0.18)mm2/s. There was a significant difference in the ADC value between patients with primary gallbladder cancer and those with primary HCC ( t =2.425, P＜0. 05). The area under the ROC was 0. 756 (95% confidence interval: 0.577-0. 935), and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.4% and 81.8%, respectively, when the threshold value was 0.96 mm2/s.Conclusion The ADC value of patients with primary gallbladder cancer is lower than those with primary HCC when the b value is 800 s/mm2, which is helpful in the differential diagnosis of primary gallbladder cancer and primary HCC.
