Optical enhancement mode 2 improves the detection rate of gastric neoplastic lesion in high-risk populations: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: Detection of early neoplastic lesions is crucial for improving the survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. Optical enhancement mode 2 is a new image-enhanced endoscopic technique that offers bright images and can improve the visibility of neoplastic lesions. This study aimed to compare the detection of neoplastic lesions with optical enhancement mode 2 and white-light imaging (WLI) in a high-risk population. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to optical enhancement mode 2 or WLI groups. Detection of suspicious neoplastic lesions during the examinations was recorded, and pathological diagnoses served as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 1211 and 1219 individuals were included in the optical enhancement mode 2 and WLI groups, respectively. The detection rate of neoplastic lesions was significantly higher in the optical enhancement mode 2 group (5.1% vs. 1.9%; risk ratio, 2.656 [95% confidence interval, 1.630-4.330]; p < 0.001). The detection rate of neoplastic lesions with an atrophic gastritis background was significantly higher in the optical enhancement mode 2 group (8.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). The optical enhancement mode 2 group also had a higher detection rate among endoscopists with different experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Optical enhancement mode 2 was more effective than WLI for detecting neoplastic lesions in the stomach, and can serve as a new method for screening early gastric cancer in clinical practice. CLINICAL REGISTRY: United States National Library of Medicine (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov), ID: NCT040720521.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with minimally invasive surgery for acute respiratory failure and sudden cardiac arrest: A case report.

Acute respiratory failure and sudden cardiac arrest caused by acute intrathoracic infection is a fatal clinical condition with a low resuscitation success rate. The present study describes the case of a patient with acute empyema secondary to an acute lung abscess rupture, complicated by acute respiratory failure and sudden cardiac arrest caused by severe hypoxemia. The patient recovered well through the administration of multiple therapeutic measures, including medication and closed chest drainage, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with continuous renal replacement therapy, and minimally invasive surgical resection of the lung lesion with persistent alveolar fistula as the clinical manifestation. To the best of our knowledge, the treatment of such a severe condition combined with thoracoscopic surgery has rarely been reported before, and the present study may provide insight regarding therapeutic schedules for acute respiratory failure by intrathoracic infection, and excision of ruptured lung abscess.

Value of Magnifying Chromoendoscopy and Magnifying Optical Enhancement Technology in Classifying Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Magnifying chromoendoscopy (ME-CE) through the observation of pit patterns is a productive way to distinguish between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Magnifying optical enhancement technology (ME-OE) is an emerging virtual chromoendoscopy imaging technology and appeared to be a promising approach. However, this information is currently not available. This study is aimed at comparing the differential diagnostic value of ME-CE and OE for neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized (1 : 1) into examination by ME-OE or ME-CE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of two endoscopy methods were compared using ME-OE (were classified according to the JNET classification) and ME-CE (were classified according to the Kudo pit pattern classification), respectively, and the time to predict the histological polyp type was compared. And the agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis by ME-OE or ME-CE were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 365 polyps were found in the 220 patients included (ME-OE: 185; ME-CE: 180.202 had nonneoplastic polyps, 163 had neoplastic polyps). The diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-CE (93% vs. 92%, p > 0.05). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than ME-CE (83 ± 26.4 s vs. 194 ± 17.7 s, p < 0.001). The agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis were at least substantial in both groups. CONCLUSION: ME-OE was superlative to ME-CE in predicting the histology of polyps. OE devoted classification would possibly similarly enhance the endoscopist performance. The trial is registered with ChiCT2000032075.

Comparison of white-light endoscopy, optical-enhanced and acetic-acid magnifying endoscopy for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion of the stomach, which severely affects human life and health. Currently, a variety of endoscopic techniques are used to screen/evaluate GIM. Traditional white-light endoscopy (WLE) and acetic-acid chromoendoscopy combined with magnifying endoscopy (ME-AAC) are the interventions of choice due to their diagnostic efficacy for GIM. Optical-enhanced magnifying endoscopy (ME-OE) is a new virtual chromoendoscopy technique to identify GIM, which combines bandwidth-limited light and image enhancement processing technology to enhance the detection of mucosal and vascular details. We hypothesized that ME-OE is superior to WLE and ME-AAC in the evaluation of GIM. AIM: To directly compare the diagnostic value of WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE for detection of GIM. METHODS: A total of 156 patients were subjected to consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations using WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the three endoscopy methods in the diagnosis of GIM were evaluated. Moreover, the time to diagnosis with ME-AAC and ME-OE was analyzed. Two experts and two non-experts evaluated the GIM images diagnosed using ME-OE, and diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-observer agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: GIM was detected in 68 of 156 patients (43.6%). The accuracy of ME-OE was highest (91.7%), followed by ME-AAC (86.5%), while that of WLE (51.9%) was lowest. Per-site analysis showed that the overall diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-AAC (P = 0.011) and WLE (P < 0.001). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than in ME-AAC (64 ± 7 s vs 151 ± 30 s, P < 0.001). Finally, the inter-observer agreement was strong for both experts (k = 0.862) and non-experts (k = 0.800). The internal consistency was strong for experts (k = 0.713, k = 0.724) and moderate for non-experts (k = 0.667, k = 0.598). CONCLUSION: For endoscopists, especially experienced endoscopists, ME-OE is an efficient, convenient, and time-saving endoscopic technique that should be used for the diagnosis of GIM.

Sarcopenia and Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the value of preoperative sarcopenia in predicting complications after esophagectomy. Clinicopathologic characteristics of sarcopenia patients, which may support sarcopenia management, also were studied. METHODS: This study searched for articles describing an association between sarcopenia and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance models were used for the meta-analyses of end points. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 14 studies comprising a total of 2387 patients. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with advanced age (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-4.74), lower body mass index (WMD - 2.22; 95% CI - 2.65 to - 1.79), squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% CI 1.72-4.47), advanced clinical tumor stage (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.28-2.15), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.38-2.53). The sarcopenia patients showed lower preoperative albumin levels (WMD - 0.11; 95% CI - 0.19 to - 0.04) than the nonsarcopenia patients. Sarcopenia was significantly predictive of pneumonia (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.75-3.81) and overall complications (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07-2.15) after esophagectomy. The sarcopenia patients also showed nonsignificant increases in the risks of anastomotic leakage (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.99-1.67), vocal cord palsy (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.89-4.64), and major complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.95-1.79) but not increased operation time, blood loss, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sarcopenia assessment showed considerable potential for predicting postoperative complications for esophageal cancer patients. To realize this potential, more effective diagnostic criteria and severity classifications for sarcopenia are warranted.

Probe-based endomicroscopy for in vivo detection of gastric intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Background and study aims Owing to the indistinctive endoscopic appearance of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN), and early gastric cancer (EGC), a significant number of such lesions may be missed during surveillance endoscopy. The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the value of combined computed virtual chromoendoscopy (flexible spectral imaging color enhancement [FICE]) and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) for in vivo detection of GIM, GIN, and EGC. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial performed in 238 patients at four tertiary centers. Patients were randomized to FICE-guided pCLE with targeted biopsies (group A) or FICE with standard biopsies (group B). The diagnostic yield of GIM, GIN, or EGC was compared between the two groups. Results On a per-patient assessment, the diagnostic yield for GIM/GIN/EGC was 73.3 % (88/120) in group A and 63.6 % (75/118) in group B (P = 0.09). On a per-biopsy analysis, FICE-guided pCLE with targeted biopsies significantly increased the diagnostic yield of GIM/GIN/EGC vs. FICE with standard biopsies, from 31.5 % (252/800) to 75.1 % (313/417) (P < 0.001). In addition, pCLE-guided targeted biopsies led to a significant 48.5 % decrease in the number of biopsies per patient vs. FICE with standard biopsies (P < 0.001). Conclusions Real-time pCLE and targeted biopsies after FICE improved the diagnostic yield for the detection of GIM, GIN, and EGC, and only required about half the number of biopsies vs. FICE with standard biopsies. This may allow a better regimen for endoscopic surveillance and subsequent treatment of patients with premalignant and malignant gastric abnormalities.Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515721).