Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Se Pu ; 42(3): 256-263, 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503702

RESUMEN

Herbicides play an important role in preventing and controlling weeds and harmful plants and are increasingly used in agriculture, forestry, landscaping, and other fields. However, the effective utilization rate of herbicides is only 20%-30%, and most herbicides enter the atmosphere, soil, sediment, and water environments through drift, leaching, and runoff after field application. Herbicide residues in the environment pose potential risks to ecological safety and human health. Therefore, establishing analytical methods to determine herbicide residues in environmental samples is of great importance. In this study, an analytical method based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI+) was developed for the determination of isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil residues in soil, sediment, and water. The instrumental detection parameters, including electrospray ionization mode, mobile phase, and chromatographic column, were optimized. The mobile phases were methanol (A) and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (B). Gradient elution was performed as follows: 0-1.0 min, 60%A; 1.0-2.0 min, 60%A-90%A; 2.0-3.0 min, 90%A; 3.0-4.0 min, 90%A-60%A; 4.0-5.0 min, 60%A. The samples were salted after extraction with acetonitrile and cleaned using a C18 solid-phase extraction column. Different solid-phase extraction columns and leaching conditions were investigated during sample pretreatment. Working curves in the neat solvent and matrix were constructed by plotting the measured peak areas as a function of the concentrations of the analytes in the neat solvent and matrix. Good linearities were found for isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil in the solvent and matrix-matched standards in the range of 0.0005-0.02 mg/L, with r≥0.9961. The matrix effects of the three herbicides in soil, sediment, and water ranged from -10.1% to 16.5%. The limits of detection (LODs, S/N=3) for isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil were 0.05, 0.01, and 0.02 µg/kg, respectively. The limits of quantification (LOQs, S/N=10) for isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil were 0.2, 0.05, and 0.05 µg/kg, respectively. The herbicides were applied to soil, sediment, and water at spiked levels of 0.005, 0.1, and 2.0 mg/kg, respectively. The average recoveries for isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil in soil, sediment, and water were in the ranges of 77.2%-101.9%, 77.9%-105.1%, and 80.8%-107.1%, respectively. The RSDs for isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil were in the ranges of 1.4%-12.8%, 1.2%-7.7%, and 1.5%-11.5%, respectively. The established method was used to analyze actual samples collected from four different sites in Zhejiang Province (Xiaoshan, Taizhou, Dongyang, and Yuhang) and one site in Heilongjiang (Jiamusi). The proposed method is simple, rapid, accurate, stable, and highly practical. It can be used to detect isoxaflutole, metazachlor, and saflufenacil residues in soil, sediment, and water and provides a reference for monitoring the residual pollution and environmental behavior of herbicides.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas , Herbicidas , Pirimidinonas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Cromatografía Liquida , Herbicidas/análisis , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Agua/análisis , Suelo/química , Solventes/análisis , Extracción en Fase Sólida
2.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 44(3): 1542-1552, 2023 Mar 08.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922215

RESUMEN

In order to clarify the differences in the effects of vegetation restoration strategies on soil carbon sequestration and aggregate stability under different water-eroded environments, we collected experimental data from 91 papers and evaluated the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and aggregate stability to vegetation restoration based on Meta-analysis. The results showed the following:① compared with cropland or bare land, forestland/grassland restoration was beneficial to increase SOC stock and improve aggregate stability, but the dominant functions of the two were different. The effect of forestland restoration on carbon sequestration was stronger than that of grassland reforestation, and the effect of grassland restoration on aggregate stability was stronger than that of forestland restoration. ② Multi-factor Meta-analysis showed that the factors that significantly affected SOC were restoration year, soil clay content, vegetation coverage, mean annual precipitation (MAP), mean annual temperature (MAT), and soil depth. The positive effect of vegetation restoration on SOC stock increased with the increase in vegetation coverage rate. Grassland restoration had a more significant effect on SOC stock when soil clay content was 20%-32%, it was more likely to promote the carbon sequestration effect of grassland when MAP>800 mm or MAT<15℃, and there was no significant change in SOC stock under different restoration years. However, the effect of forestland restoration on SOC stock was more significant when soil clay content was>32%. Climate conditions had no limited effect on SOC stock in forestland, and there was a positive effect between SOC stock under forestland restoration and restoration years. ③ Vegetation restoration had stronger significant positive effects on mean weight diameter (MWD) and mean geometric diameter (GMD) when the clay content was 20%-32%, and MWD and GMD increased with the increase in vegetation coverage. ④SOC stock growth could explain 25% and 24% of the variation in the effect value of MWD and GMD, respectively. These results indicated that the formation of SOC was the result of multiple factors, and soil aggregate stability was limited only by vegetation coverage and soil clay content. The increase in SOC stock could promote the improvement of water stability MWD and GMD. These results can clarify the carbon sequestration effect of different vegetation restoration measures in water-eroded environments and provide theoretical reference for the restoration and reconstruction of degraded ecosystems.

3.
Yi Chuan ; 34(10): 1328-38, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23099790

RESUMEN

Gene pyramiding aims at producing individuals with one superior economic trait according to the optimal breeding scheme involving selection of favorable target alleles or linked markers after crossing basal populations and pyramiding them into a single individual. In consideration of animal traditional cross program along with the features of animal segregating population, four types of cross programs and two types of selection strategies for gene pyramiding are performed from practice perspective of view, two population cross for pyramiding two genes (denoted II), three populations cascading cross for pyramiding three genes (denoted III), four population symmetrical (denoted IV-S) and cascading cross for pyramiding four genes (denoted IV-C), and various schemes (denoted cross program-A-E) were designed for each cross program with different levels of initial favorable allele frequencies, basal population sizes, and trait heritabilities. The process of gene pyramiding for various schemes were simulated and compared based on the population hamming distance, average superior genotype frequencies, and average phenotypic values. By simulation, the results showed that larger base population size and higher initial favorite allele frequency resulted in higher efficiency of gene pyramiding. The order of parent crossing was shown to be the most important factor in cascading cross, but had no significant influence on the symmetric cross. The results also showed that genotypic selection strategy was superior to phenotypic selection in accelerating gene pyramiding. The method and corresponding software would be used to compare different cross schemes and selection strategies. Moreover, our study would help to build the optimal gene pyramiding simulation platform.


Asunto(s)
Cruzamiento , Cruzamientos Genéticos , Animales , Genotipo , Fenotipo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...