RESUMEN
Objective: To review studies on digital medicine in cardiovascular diseases (CVD), discuss its development process, knowledge structure and research hotspots, and provide a perspective for researchers in this field. Methods: The relevant literature in recent 20 years (January 2004 to October 2022) were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). CiteSpace was used to demonstrate our knowledge of keywords, co-references and speculative frontiers. VOSviewer was used to chart the contributions of authors, institutions and countries and incorporates their link strength into the table. Results: A total of 5265 English articles in set timespan were included. The number of publications increased steadily annually. The United States (US) produced the highest number of publications, followed by England. Most publications were from Harvard Medicine School, followed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham Women's Hospital. The most authoritative academic journal was JMIR mHealth and uHealth. Noseworthy PA may have the highest influence in this intersected field with the highest number of citations and total link strength. The utilization of wearable mobile devices in the context of CVD, encompassing the identification of risk factors, diagnosis and prevention of diseases, as well as early intervention and remote management of diseases, has been widely acknowledged as a knowledge base and an area of current interest. To investigate the impact of various digital medicine interventions on chronic care and assess their clinical effectiveness, examine the potential of machine learning (ML) in delivering clinical care for atrial fibrillation (AF) and identifying early disease risk factors, as well as explore the development of disease prediction models using neural networks (NNs), ML and unsupervised learning in CVD prognosis, may emerge as future trends and areas of focus. Conclusion: Recently, there has been a significant surge of interest in the investigation of digital medicine in CVD. This initial bibliometric study offers a comprehensive analysis of the research landscape pertaining to digital medicine in CVD, thereby furnishing related scholars with a dependable reference to facilitate further progress in this domain.
RESUMEN
Objective. In China, the method of clearing heat and removing dampness medicine of Chinese traditional medicine has been widely used on gout. However, the clinical effects are various and not summarized systematically. Methods. In this study, a large number of randomized controlled clinical trials were reviewed and analyzed and the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of traditional Chinese medicine with clearing heat and removing dampness effects for the treatment of gout were systematically evaluated. A comprehensive search of databases including pubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed was performed. Results. There are 69 randomized controlled trials with 5915 sample sizes meeting the criteria in the study. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that the effects of clearing heat and removing dampness medicine were slightly better than western medicine in the treatment of gout based on the following parameters: serum uric acid (standardized mean difference (SMD):-62.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): -78.12 to-46.15), C reactive protein (SMD: -4.21, 95% CI: -6.19 to -2.23), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (SMD: -6.23, 95% CI: -8.39 to-4.06), and overall clinical response (relative risk (RR): 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.15) and, in the profile of adverse drug reactions, the clearing heat and removing dampness medicine showed less adverse reactions than traditional Western medicine (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.32). Conclusions. Through a systemic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the clearing heat and removing dampness medicine of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine on gout, the clearing heat and removing dampness medicine and western medicine possessed similar clinical efficacy, but traditional Chinese medicine treatments are superior to western medicine in controlling adverse reactions.
