Evaluation of a Stress Management Course for Shipboard Sailors.

BACKGROUND: As part of their day-to-day operational mission, shipboard sailors experience unique stressors that can affect their health and readiness. The San Diego Fleet and Family Support Center (FFSC) conducts in-person classes to teach stress management principles to sailors. The FFSC stress management course covers the causes and consequences of stress, reviews the Navy Operational Stress Control model, and provides information on basic stress management skills. This course has not been rigorously evaluated to determine its impact on the sailors' ability to manage stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term impact of the FFSC stress management class on the (1) sailors' stress management knowledge, (2) sailors' intention to share knowledge from the class with others, and (3) sailors' satisfaction with the class. METHOD: Shipboard sailors (n = 95) who attended a stress management course completed pretest and posttest assessments that measured workplace stress, current stress management behaviors, stress management knowledge, intention to share course information, and participant satisfaction with the course. Most ratings were made on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicated more positive outcomes. RESULTS: In the aggregate, participants gave high marks for the class (M = 3.81, SD = 0.66), gave positive ratings for the class instructors (M = 3.84, SD = 0.67), and were satisfied with the class (M = 4.05, SD = 0.63). Sailors also reported that the class was relevant to their work (M = 3.64, SD = 0.81). Overall, 80% of class participants intended to share information learned in the class with family members and military friends, potentially extending the reach and impact of the FFSC class. Finally, sailors did not show increased stress management knowledge as a result of taking the FFSC stress management class (P = .31). CONCLUSION: This study was the first evaluation of the short-term impact of the FFSC stress management course on the stress management knowledge of shipboard crews. Study limitations prevented the study team from assessing the long-term impact of the stress management course on future stress levels and stress abatement behaviors. Recommendations are made to enhance future evaluations of FFSC classes for service members.

We're Stronger Together: A Collaboration to Support Military Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges for every segment of the U.S. population, including military personnel and their families. The TriService Nursing Research Program's Military Family Research Interest Group (FIG) formed a collaboration with Blue Star Families, a civilian non-profit organization, to identify potential issues faced by military families during the pandemic. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: The Pain Points Poll was introduced online by Blue Star Families, and findings were aggregated weekly between March 18 and May 26, 2020. Volunteer poll respondents were mainly recruited through social media outreach. FIG-informed questions were incorporated in week 4 of polling and focused on workplace environment, financial health, social support, physical and mental health, child behavior, utilization of family care plans, and general well-being. Data were collected to gain real-time insights into the major challenges posed by the pandemic. Findings from FIG-informed questions were collaboratively reviewed and analyzed by FIG and BSF teams. Data-driven recommendations were made to stakeholders to improve processes and reprioritize investments for services that aim to alleviate the impact of COVID-19 on military families. FINDINGS: A total of 2,895 military family units (i.e., service members and spouses) responded to the poll, a majority of which (88%) represented active duty family units. Although the majority of families (range: 59%-69%) noted no impact to their finances, approximately one in five families endorsed dipping into their savings during the pandemic. A majority of respondents (69.5%) reported taking active measures to support their mental health, endorsing various strategies. Among parents of special needs children, 45% of active duty families and 60% of single-parent service members reported the inability to maintain continued services for their children. A majority of parents with school-aged children (65%) reported child behavioral changes due to their child's inability to socialize with peers. Among military service members, 41% were concerned about obtaining fair performance evaluations during the crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic produced significant challenges for military families. Collaboration between military and civilian partners can inform policies and appropriate strategies to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 for military families. The findings presented here provide insight into areas where military families can be supported for optimal outcomes during unprecedented times.

Finding the evidence: Screening of Military Family Research, 2014-2017.

Of 1.3 million active duty service members, the majority have family responsibilities; 54.3% are married, and 41.2% have at least one child. The authors sought to determine existing areas of focus in military family research and to identify areas that are currently understudied. The authors queried four literature databases from January 2014 to May 2017, and 2,502 articles were identified in the initial catchment. All 595 article abstracts that met inclusion criteria were sorted into one or more of 12 topics. Topics with the highest number of articles included Mental Health and Care (n = 276), Adult/Couple Partner Relationships (n = 247), and Deployment Issues (n = 244). Topics with sparse articles included Maternal/Child & Newborn Health (n = 27), Health Promotion (n = 10), and Special Heath Care Needs (n = 4). The three topics with the highest number of articles reflect interdependent and overlapping themes and showcase the importance of family relationships to the operational readiness of active duty members. The topics with fewer numbers of articles highlight areas where more evidence is needed. Understanding the current evidence allows nurse practitioners to support military families appropriately in real time.

"We Want to Build a Network": Professional Experiences of Case Managers Working With Military Families.

Optimizing case management (CM) services increases service member readiness at home and abroad. However, little research has been conducted on the experiences of case managers providing services to military families within the Military Health System. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted to explore the professional experiences of case managers to identify factors that may affect care to military families. A total of 53 case managers from military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) varying in size, location, and branch of service were interviewed by telephone to explore their perspectives. Qualitative content analysis was performed. Case managers serve a variety of functions, but specific roles vary between MTFs. Factors that affect CM services for military families were identified: (1) need for pediatric specialization, (2) heavy workload, (3) appropriate staff, (4) patient handoffs, and (5) the role of CM. Recommendations for improving CM services to facilitate the well-being of military families are discussed.

Scoping Review and Gap Analysis of Research Related to the Health of Women in the U.S. Military, 2000 to 2015.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the results of a scoping review and analysis of health care use data to identify gaps in knowledge related to the health of women in the U.S. military. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for articles published between January 2000 and September 2015. We obtained health care use data from military diagnostic and pharmacy databases. STUDY SELECTION: All studies pertaining to the health and readiness of U.S. Active Duty service members were retained. Articles that contained mixed samples (i.e., male and female participants) were required to have a gender-stratified analysis of results to be included. DATA EXTRACTION: We identified a total of 14,999 articles; 979 met inclusion criteria. Articles were categorized across eight major topic areas and 73 subtopic areas. DATA SYNTHESIS: We synthesized literature results and health care use data to identify gaps in knowledge. We categorized most articles into the readiness (n = 561) and psychological health (n = 429) main topic areas; categorizations were not mutually exclusive. Overall, 89.4% (n = 879) of articles were of good to excellent quality. We identified gaps in seven of eight major topic areas and in 26 of 73 subtopic areas, but most were found in the obstetric-gynecologic health topic area and the psychological health topic areas. Less than 5% (n = 40) of the published research in this analysis included an experimental or quasi-experimental design. CONCLUSION: Although high-quality research on the health of U.S. servicewomen exists on all major topics covered in this review, gaps in the literature exist. Our review provides the first step to map the extant landscape of research on the health of women in the U.S. military and is a guide for future research, policy, and intervention.