Portable and wearable electromyographic devices for the assessment of sleep bruxism and awake bruxism: A literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The current state of portable/wearable electromyographic (EMG) devices for assessment of bruxism was reviewed. METHODS: A search of full-text articles relevant to portable/wearable EMG devices capable of being used at home was performed. The data source used was MEDLINE via PubMed from January 1970 to July 2019. RESULTS: There were nine kinds of wearable EMG devices capable of being used under unrestrained conditions. Ultra-miniaturized wearable EMG devices with a level of performance equivalent to that of conventional stationary EMG devices have been developed and are being used during sleep and in the daytime. The devices have a high level of diagnostic accuracy for sleep bruxism. A definite cut-off value for awake bruxism has not been established. DISCUSSION: Assessment of sleep bruxism with a high level of accuracy can be performed using a portable/wearable EMG device. However, a definite cut-off value is required for assessment of awake bruxism.

Comparison of the occurrence of sleep bruxism under accustomed conditions at home and under polysomnography conditions in a sleep laboratory.

PURPOSE: We aimed to clarify the relationship between the number of sleep bruxism (SB) bursts at home and in a laboratory equipped with polysomnography with audio-video recording (PSG-AV). We applied an identical single-channel wearable electromyography (EMG) device for both types of SB burst scorings. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy student volunteers (12 men and 8 women; mean age, 21.9 years) who were clinically diagnosed with bruxism based on the criteria set forth by the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2). We used a wearable EMG device attached to the masseteric area (the FLA-500-SD [FLA]), for scoring SB bursts at home and in the laboratory. PSG-AV was set within the laboratory environment as well. The mean interval for both sleep studies was 28.8 days. EMG bursts with amplitudes greater than twice the baseline amplitude and with durations of longer than 0.25 s were selected. EMG bursts with amplitudes ≥5% MVC (maximum voluntary contraction), ≥10% MVC, and ≥20% MVC were selected as well. A cluster of bursts was defined as an episode. RESULTS: In all the conditions for selecting EMG bursts specified above, the number of SB bursts and episodes recorded under laboratory conditions was statistically significantly smaller than that recorded at home. There were no statistically significant differences between the data obtained on the first and second recording days. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the unfamiliar environment of a sleep laboratory equipped with PSG-AV affects the emergence of SB as compared with home conditions.

Minimum measurement time of masseteric electromyogram required for assessment of awake bruxism during the daytime.

Objective: Assessments of diurnal awake bruxism (d-AB) using masseteric electromyogram (EMG) during various lengths of measurement time within a day were examined as the first step of research to clarify the minimum measurement time required for assessment of d-AB by subject.Methods: Subjects were 33 outpatients. Assessment of d-AB by EMG during partial measurement time (PMT) with durations ranging from 30 minutes to 6 hours was compared with that during total measurement time (TMT) used as the reference standard.Results: No significant difference was found between TMT data and PMT data. There were significant correlations in all combinations between TMT data and PMT data. Accuracy was 0.909 or more for 2.5 hours or longer.Discussion: The results suggest that the tendency of daytime muscle activity in 1 day can be assessed even by using masseteric EMG data obtained during a relatively short measurement time.

Quantitative analyses of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in sleep bruxism.

Rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), which is defined as three or more consecutive phasic bursts, accounts for a large part of sleep bruxism (SB). RMMA is thought to be characterized by co-contraction, a jaw muscle activity in which jaw-opening muscles contract during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles, which is different from that during mastication. However, there has been limited information about co-contraction. The aim of the present study was to clarify the amplitudes and patterns of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in RMMA. Data from 14 healthy volunteers with bruxism, which was diagnosed by using polysomnographic recording with audio-video, were analysed. RMMA with electromyographic amplitudes of more than two times the baseline amplitude was selected. From the selected RMMA, burst groups consisting of five or more consecutive phasic bursts, including tonic bursts, were selected for analyses. Electromyographic activities during gum chewing were also recorded before sleeping. The minimum, maximum and average value of the amplitudes of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles were calculated. Jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in RMMA was closer to the baseline than that in gum chewing. The minimum, maximum and average values of amplitudes of jaw-opening muscle activity during the phase were significantly smaller than those of gum chewing. Contrary to our hypothesis prior to the study, the obtained results suggested that the pattern of electromyogram activity of jaw-opening and jaw-closing muscles in RMMA was not necessarily co-contraction.

Validity of single-channel masseteric electromyography by using an ultraminiature wearable electromyographic device for diagnosis of sleep bruxism.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the validity of assessment of sleep bruxism (SB) by using single-channel electromyogram (EMG) and a cut-off value with optimum sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: The subjects were twenty volunteers with clinical diagnosis of SB. Assessment by masseteric EMG data only by using a wearable EMG was compared with reference standard assessment by masseteric EMG data using polysomnography with audio-visual recording (PSG-AV). From EMG activities recorded by single-channel EMG, bursts of more than two times the baseline amplitude with a duration of 0.25s or more were selected by a burst unit (EMG-burst-all). Furthermore, from EMG-burst-all, bursts that were more than 5-20% of the maximum voluntary contraction value (EMG-burst-5%, EMG-burst-10%, EMG-burst-20%) were selected. By an episode unit, phasic, tonic, and mixed episodes were selected by single-channel EMG (EMG-episodes). Among the EMG-episodes, further, reference standard episodes of SB (PSG-episodes) were selected by PSG-AV assessment. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects were diagnosed as bruxers based on PSG-AV (PSG-episodes/h >2). By a burst unit and an episode unit, there were significant correlations between assessment variables of SB by single-channel EMG and PSG-AV except for EMG-burst-20%/h. When the cut-off value in EMG-episodes/h was 5.5/h for sleep bruxers, both sensitivity and specificity were 100%. As for variables by a burst unit, EMG-burst-all/h and EMG-burst-5% had higher values of sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that single-channel EMG is valid for diagnosis of SB if a cut-off value that is appropriate for single-channel EMG is used.

Diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of sleep bruxism using an ambulatory single-channel EMG device.

PURPOSE: Self-reported measures have been widely used to indicate the presence of possible and probable sleep bruxism (SB) in both research and clinical situations. However, few studies have attempted to assess the diagnostic validity of this approach. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of SB using an ambulatory single-channel electromyographic (EMG) device. METHODS: A total of 115 participants were enrolled and examined by standardized Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) including two questions related to SB: self-reported SB and morning-jaw symptoms. An ambulatory single-channel EMG device (GrindCare3™, Medotech A/S) was used for measuring jaw-muscle EMG activity during sleep for seven consecutive nights. Cut-off values for different measures of EMG activity (average, maximum and minimum) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were selected to divide participants into two groups, with higher or lower EMG activity or CV values. The sensitivity and specificity for each question and combination of them were calculated. RESULTS: Self-reported SB had the highest sensitivity (compared with morning-jaw symptoms) for all measures of EMG activity and CV, although the values were low to modest (average: 76.0%, maximum: 76.9%, minimum: 77.3%, CV: 61.0%). The specificity was low for both the questions related to the different measures of EMG activity and CV (35.1-52.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of SB was low to modest using an ambulatory EMG device assessment as a reference. Using only self-reported measures for the assessment of SB may not have a high validity, which should be taken into consideration in the clinical evaluation of patients.

Site-to-site variation of muscle activity and sensitivity in the human anterior temporalis muscle: implications for contingent stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate variation of electromyographic (EMG) activity and sensitivity between different sites of anterior temporalis (AT) muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy subjects (eight men: 28.8 ± 5.2 year old and eight women: 29.1 ± 3.9) participated in one experimental session. EMG activity during masticatory muscle contraction was recorded from nine sites at the AT muscle in a 3 × 3 grid with 1 cm between. The subjects maintained steady 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) using visual feedback. The surface EMG electrode was moved sequentially between these nine test sites and the contractions were repeated. One site was tested four times to assess test-re-test variability. The sensory threshold to electrical stimulation and impedance was also measured at the same sites as the placement of EMG electrodes. RESULTS: The 30% MVC force values did not differ between sites (p = 0.863) or within the same site (p = 0.995) due to the feedback. The EMG activity during 30% MVC was highest at the anterior-superior site (p < 0.05) with a marginal difference within the same site (p = 0.044). Impedance was higher at the posterior-superior, posterior-middle and posterior-inferior sites (p < 0.05). The sensory threshold was highest at the posterior-superior site (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings showed that electrodes close to the hairline have higher impedance and sensory thresholds and should be avoided. The anterior-superior site produces the highest EMG activity and lower sensory thresholds and can be recommended as the optimal site to place the electrode for contingent stimulation.