Correction to: An Initial Experience of Shoulder Resections and Reconstruction for Bone Tumours from a Cancer Centre in North-East India.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01292-x.].

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on a Tertiary Care Center's Surgical Volume and Outcomes: a Single Institutional Study from Northeast India.

In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical volume and outcomes between this COVID-19 period and data from non-COVID-19 period of last year. A retrospective observational study was done in one single surgical unit of a dedicated oncology center in a peripheral location in India. The comparison was done between patients undergoing major cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic period of 1st April to 30th June 2020, when a nation-wide lockdown was in force, to a comparable period of last year. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software 20.0. A total of 72 patients underwent major cancer surgery during this period, with surgery for breast cancer (n = 26) being the major sub-site operated. This was a significant decrease from the total 209 major cancer surgeries performed during a similar period of last year (2019) (p < 0.05). There were several reasons for the decrease in surgical numbers, including the difficulty in travel and accommodation during the lockdown period. The mean distance of patient's residence from the treating hospital was 45.7 km (range 4 to 165 km). Public transport was in a limbo and inter-state travel was restrictive with mandatory quarantine rules in effect. Morbidity associated with major surgeries was observed to be significantly less during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 times (8.3% vs 17.2% with a p value of < 0.05), which can probably be attributed to the lesser number of complex surgical procedures being performed. There was no significant difference between the total mortality percentages (2.8% vs 3.8%). A total of 156 PPE kits were used (3-4/per patient) throughout the in-hospital care of the surgical patients included in this study. In the midst of a pandemic, the delivery of surgical cancer care is an essential service and although the surgical volume is significantly hampered due to various reasons, the outcomes are largely unaffected.

An Initial Experience of Shoulder Resections and Reconstruction for Bone Tumours from a Cancer Centre in North-East India.

Advances in surgery and multidisciplinary approach have made limb salvage surgery feasible in most patients with tumours around the shoulder joint. Although resection and reconstruction options are complex, good outcomes can be achieved when performed at a specialised centre. The data of patients with bone tumours who underwent proximal humeral resection and reconstruction in a single cancer centre were prospectively analysed. Comparison between biological and non-biological reconstruction was done in seven patients of which three patients underwent biological reconstruction and four patients had non-biological reconstruction. Measurement data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The mean values were compared using independent t test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival with log rank test for comparison among groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval. There were six males and two female patients. Mean follow-up duration was 17.3 months. The mean age of patients was 24.7 ± 16.3 years. The mean functional score for biological reconstruction was 26.3 ± 1.16 and for non-biological reconstruction was 24.5 ± 1.3 with a p value of 0.1. Overall survival of patients with biological reconstruction was 75% and non-biological reconstruction was 100% with a p value of 0.3. Recurrence-free survival for biological reconstruction and non-biological reconstruction was 75% and 100%, respectively, with p value of 0.3. Limb salvage surgery in a dedicated cancer centre is a feasible option for most tumours around the shoulder joint. Biological and non-biological reconstructions both produced acceptable functional outcomes in our patients.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Multivisceral Resection in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in North-East India

Purpose: Locally advanced colorectal cancer may require an en bloc resection of surrounding organs or structures to achieve complete tumor removal. This decision must weigh the risk of complications of multivisceral resection against the potential survival benefit. The purpose of this study is to review a single-center experience of feasibility of en bloc multivisceral resections for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma and to examine the effect of surgical experience on immediate outcome and rate of R0 resections. Methods: This is a study of 27 patients who underwent multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma which was performed at our institute from January 2016 to December 2019. Among the 27 patients aged between 21 and 76 years (mean age, 48.67±7.3 years), 13 were males and 14 were females. Overall 18 patients had primary colon carcinoma and 9 had primary rectal carcinoma. All rectal cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. All patients underwent surgery with curative intent. All patients underwent open surgery of which 66.7% underwent colectomy, 14.8% underwent anterior resection, 11.1% underwent Miles procedure, and 7.4% underwent pelvic exenteration. Results: The mean operative time was 268.14±72.2 minutes and the median amount of blood units transfused was 2.07 units. The mean hospital stay was 13.67±3.4 days. Histologically, 44.4% of patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and 55.6% had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The final histopathological examinatio n revealed malignant infiltration of the adjacent organs in 19/27 patients (70.4%). Pathological complete response was seen in 2 patients. R0 resection rate achieved was 96.3%. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 66.7% of patients with colon cancer and 11.1% with rectal cancer with overall mean number of harvested lymph nodes being 12.44±3.01. Postoperative complications were identified in 7 patients (25.9%), while mortality was seen in 2 (7.4%). Conclusion: Multivisceral resection for advanced colorectal cancer invading into the adjacent organ may be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Radical Gastrectomy: Still the Gold Standard Treatment for Gastric Cancer-Our Experience from a Tertiary Care Center from Northeast India.

Gastric cancer (GC) is common in the northeast and southern parts of India. Radical surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and offers the only chance for cure. This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of all resectable gastric cancers that presented to our tertiary cancer center in Northeast India. All patients undergoing upfront surgery for gastric cancer with curative intention between 2012 and 2017 were included in the study. A total of 116 patients who underwent upfront radical gastrectomy were included in the study. Males (58.6%) were more common than females (41.4%). Mean age at presentation was 56.12 years (range 26-89). The most common mode of presentation was pain abdomen (53.8%). The most common location of tumor was the distal part (81%) followed by the proximal part (10.3%). The most commonly done procedure was distal radical gastrectomy (56.9%) followed by subtotal gastrectomy (32.8%). Median number of lymph nodes isolated was 14. Fifty-four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 32 patients received adjuvant chemoradiation (CTRT). At a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 2-78 months), overall 5-year survival was 23.75% (mean survival 33.77 months, median survival 24 months). The 5-year survival for stages I-III was 100%, 26.25%, and 11.25%, respectively (P < 0.001). Though perioperative chemotherapy has a role in gastric cancer, it is not the substitute for radical D2 gastrectomy which is still the gold standard treatment especially in high-volume centers.

Reverse sural flap - A feasible option for oncological defects of the lower extremity, ankle, and foot: Our experience from Northeast India.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue management around the lower third of the leg and foot presents a challenge to the surgeon. To achieve local control of tumor, additional surgical margins are required, thus creating large soft-tissue defects. The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) is a popular option for many of these defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent resection of tumor around the lower leg, ankle, and foot, and reconstruction with RSAF was performed at our institute from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: Among the 26 studied patients, aged between 22 and 71 (mean age: 50.8) years, 5 were female and rest were male. The most common site of involvement by tumor was heel (42.3%), followed by sole (26.9%). The most common histopathological diagnosis was melanoma (61.5%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (26.9%) and soft-tissue sarcoma (11.5%). CONCLUSION: The distally based sural flap is a reliable flap for the coverage of soft-tissue defects following oncological defects of the distal lower extremity and foot.

Primary Ovarian Carcinoma with Rectal Metastasis-a Rare Presentation (a Case Report).

Rectal metastasis from primary ovarian cancer is a rare condition. In this case report, we present a case of 45-year-old female presented with chief complaint of pain abdomen and vomiting and with on and off history of per rectal bleeding. On examination, patient was pallor, hemoglobin level of 5.5 for which she was admitted. On per rectal examination, there was circumferential rectal growth around 7 cm from anal verge. Imaging was suggestive of ovarian lesion with rectal growth. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry of rectal growth was suggestive of metastatic well-differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma probably of ovarian origin. In view of its rare presentation, we want to report this case.

Predicting morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis in an Indian population: a comparative study of the BISAP score, Ranson's score and CT severity index.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score in predicting mortality, as well as intermediate markers of severity, in a tertiary care centre in east central India, which caters mostly for an economically underprivileged population. METHODS: A total of 119 consecutive cases with acute pancreatitis were admitted to our institution between November 2012 and October 2014. BISAP scores were calculated for all cases, within 24 hours of presentation. Ranson's score and computed tomography severity index (CTSI) were also established. The respective abilities of the three scoring systems to predict mortality was evaluated using trend and discrimination analysis. The optimal cut-off score for mortality from the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the development of persistent organ failure and pancreatic necrosis (PNec). RESULTS: Of the 119 cases, 42 (35.2%) developed organ failure and were classified as severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), 47 (39.5%) developed PNec, and 12 (10.1%) died. The area under the curve (AUC) results for BISAP score in predicting SAP, PNec, and mortality were 0.962, 0.934 and 0.846, respectively. Ranson's score showed a slightly lower accuracy for predicting SAP (AUC 0.956) and mortality (AUC 0.841). CTSI was the most accurate in predicting PNec, with an AUC of 0.958. The sensitivity and specificity of BISAP score, with a cut-off of ≥3 in predicting mortality, were 100% and 69.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BISAP score represents a simple way of identifying, within 24 hours of presentation, patients at greater risk of dying and the development of intermediate markers of severity. This risk stratification method can be utilized to improve clinical care and facilitate enrolment in clinical trials.

Ulcerated primary fibrosarcoma of breast: case report and review of literature.

Breast carcinoma is a common condition worldwide but stromal sarcomas of breast are rarity in day to day surgical practice. Out of primary breast sarcomas, fibrosarcoma constitutes only 16% of cases. We report a primary fibrosarcoma of breast in a young female patient which presented as ulcerated growth and fixity to chest wall and multiple ipsilateral axillary lympadenopathy (Stage IIIb). After biopsy confirmation palliation mastectomy was done and patient was sent for chemoradiotherapy.

Mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix with enterocutaneous fistula: a therapeutic dilemma.

Mucinous cystadenoma of appendix is a rare clinical entity with very few reported cases in the literature. Consensus on optimal surgical management has not been reached. We report the case of a 65-year-old female patient who presented with fistula over the right iliac fossa. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen suggested abscess of the parietal wall. Upon exploration, a mass was found to be arising from the tip of the retroperitoneal appendix and the retroperitoneum was studded with mucoid material. Appendectomy was carried out and final histopathology revealed mucinous cystadenoma with no evidence of malignancy. The patient was discharged uneventfully. The unusual presentation of this disease, as retroperitoneal psuedomyxoma without any intraperitoneal pathology, prompted us to report this case.

Characteristics of Hollow Viscus Injury following Blunt Abdominal Trauma; a Single Centre Experience from Eastern India.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the presentation, anatomical distribution, diagnostic method, management and outcome of hollow viscus injury (HVI) from blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This  was  a  retrospective  cross-ecnal  study  including  patients  with  blunt  abdominal  trauma leading to HVI admitted at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, over a period of 4.5 years (January 2009 to July 2014). Data were retrieved from patients' medical records. Total 173 patients with HVI due to blunt abdominal trauma, who underwent laparotomy at our institute, were reviewed. Data regarding clinical presentation, anatomical distribution, management and outcome were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Out of 173 patients 87.1% were men and 12.9% were women. Mean age of patients was 29±14.02 years. The most common site of injury was ileum (46.2%) followed by jejunum (44.5%). There were 5 gastric perforations (2.9%), 2 (1.15%) duodenal, 2 (1.15%) colonic, 2 (1.15%) sigmoidal and 2 (1.15%) rectal injuries. One caecal injury was also recorded. Road traffic accident was the most common mechanism of injury (57.2%) followed by fall from height (36.4%) and assault (6.4%). Free gas under diaphragm on erect abdomen radiography was seen in 85.5% of cases while preoperative CT Abdomen was done in 11.6% of cases. Treatment consisted of simple closure of the perforation (66.5%), resection and anastomosis (11.0%) and stoma (22.5%). Major complication was anastamotic leak which was recorded in 6.4% cases and 15.6% patients developed burst abdomen. Average hospital stay was 13±6 days. Overall mortality rate was 12.7%. CONCLUSION: Although early recognition of intestinal injuries from blunt abdominal trauma may be difficult in all cases, it is very important due to its tremendous life threatening potential. Age of the patient, anatomical site and time of presentation are probably main prognostic factors.