Experiences of Stigma and Discrimination Compounded by Intersecting Identities among Individuals Receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

Stigma and discrimination create barriers to care among people receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We report qualitative findings from a mixed methods study guided by three aims: to explore (1) intersecting identities of people receiving MOUD (2) how individuals experience stigma and discrimination and (3) helpful resources in addressing cumulative experiences of multiple forms of disadvantage. We conducted interviews with 25 individuals in three treatment centers in the Northeast United States and identified six themes: (1) Living with multiple socially marginalized identities and addiction; (2) Loss; (3) "It's everywhere": Discrimination and stigma; (4) A "damaged" identity, (5) Positive responses to negative experiences: Facing reality and becoming accountable, and (6) Experiencing treatment and identifying supportive interventions. Findings highlight the complexity of intersecting, marginalized social positions. Future work should look beyond one-size-fits-all approaches to care and recognize individual vulnerabilities and strengths for improving outcomes among those experiencing OUD.

"It's all connected:" A mixed methods study of insomnia, stigma, and discrimination among individuals on medication for opioid use disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Insomnia is one of the most common sleep disorders among those with opioid use disorder (OUD), including those on medication for OUD. There is a dearth of literature exploring the role of social stressors on sleep outcomes among this group. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between OUD-related stigma and intersectional discrimination with insomnia among individuals on medication for OUD. METHODS: Participants were recruited from treatment clinics in the Northeast United States. Using a convergent mixed-methods research design, we explored associations with stigma (The Brief Opioid Stigma Scale), intersectional discrimination (Intersectional Discrimination Index), and insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index) through quantitative survey data and qualitative data from interviews for participant experiences. Data from the quantitative (n = 120) and qualitative (n = 25) components of the study were integrated for interpretation. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis indicated weak to moderate positive correlations between intersectional discrimination, and exploratory variables including pain, perceived stress, and psychological distress with insomnia severity. The qualitative analysis generated 4 main themes, which highlighted negative emotions and ruminations as factors that participants connected experiences with stigma and discrimination to poor sleep outcomes. Integration of data identified concordant and discordant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Stigma, discrimination, physical symptoms, and psychological distress appear to contribute to poor sleep outcomes among those with OUD. Future research should target maladaptive outcomes of rumination and negative emotions to improve sleep outcomes among those with OUD.

Age differences in the association of obstructive sleep apnea risk with cognition and quality of life.

Using a sample of 2925 stroke-free participants drawn from a national population-based study, we examined cross-sectional associations of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk with cognition and quality of life and whether these vary with age, while controlling for demographics and comorbidities. Included participants from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study were aged 47-93 years. OSA risk was categorized as high or low based on responses to the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire. Cognitive function was assessed with standardized fluency and recall measures. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the four-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (SF-12). Multivariate analyses of covariance (mancova) statistics were applied separately to the cognitive and quality of life dependent variables while accounting for potential confounders (demographics, comorbidities). In fully adjusted models, those at high risk for OSA had significantly lower cognitive scores (Wilks' lambda = 0.996, F3,2786  = 3.31, P < 0.05) and lower quality of life [depressive symptoms and HRQoL] (Wilks' lambda = 0.989, F3,2786  = 10.02, P < 0.0001). However, some of the associations were age-dependent. Differences in cognition and quality of life between those at high and low obstructive sleep apnea risk were most pronounced during middle age, with attenuated effects after age 70 years.