Multiple metastases of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2­positive, hormone receptor­positive, pT1a pN0 breast cancer within 1 year after surgery: A case report.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is usually not considered for pT1a pN0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer due to its low recurrence rate. The present report describes a case of pT1a hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive breast cancer with multiple recurrences in the axillary lymph nodes and liver within 1 year after radical surgery. A 58-year-old woman underwent left total mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for left breast cancer with pathological stage IA (pT1a pN0). The subtype corresponded to luminal B-like breast cancer with a nuclear grade of 3 and a Ki-67 labeling index of 37%. An aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) was planned to be administered for 5 years after surgery, but the patient was diagnosed with multiple liver and axillary lymph node metastases 11 months after surgery. After 1 year of chemotherapy (paclitaxel) in combination with anti-HER2 therapy (pertuzumab and trastuzumab), liver metastases resolved. A complete response of the liver lesion has been maintained 4 years after the anti-HER2 therapy initiation. The present case exhibited two poor prognostic factors: High Ki-67 labeling index and nuclear grade 3. Based on the 'Predict' tool, the present case would be expected to have a cancer-related mortality rate of 6% 10 years after surgery with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Although this value may be controversial for postoperative anti-HER2 therapy, the present case should not be considered to be a low-risk case. When the identification of high-risk pT1a pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer is possible, postoperative anti-HER2 therapy plus chemotherapy would be effective in decreasing the rate of recurrence.

Co-expression of mesothelin and CA125/MUC16 is a prognostic factor for breast cancer, especially in luminal-type breast cancer patients.

The expression of mesothelin correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Since mesothelin plays a role in cancer metastasis in association with CA125, we herein examined the expression of mesothelin and CA125, and the clinicopathological meaning and prognosis of the co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 in breast cancer. Our results showed that among 478 patients, mesothelin and CA125 were co-expressed in 48 (10 %), mesothelin only in 75 (16 %), CA125 only in 217 (45 %), and neither in 234 (49 %). A high correlation was observed between the expression of mesothelin and CA125 (P =0.0004). The co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 correlated with poor patient relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.0001) and was identified as an independent predictor of RFS by Cox's multivariate analysis. In conclusion, this is the first to report the prognostic significance of the co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 in breast cancer. The co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 may be clinically useful for prognostication after surgical therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal-type breast cancer.

Mesothelin is expressed in various types of malignant tumors. The present study immunohistochemically investigated mesothelin expression and its clinicopathological significance in each subtype of breast cancer, with special reference to its cellular localization, in particular, membrane mesothelin expression. Using tissue specimens from 482 patients with breast cancer, immunohistochemistry was used to study mesothelin expression and help classify its localization as membrane or cytoplasmic expression. Mesothelin expression was detected in 77 (16.0%) cases and was the highest in triple-negative breast cancer (31/75; 41.3%), followed by human epithelial growth factor receptor type 2 type (6/33, 18.2%) and luminal type (36/374; 9.6%). Among the 482 cases, membrane mesothelin expression was detected in 73 cases and was significantly associated with a negative hormone receptor status, higher Ki-67 labeling index, nuclear grade 3 and a lower relapse-free survival rate. Cytoplasmic mesothelin expression was not significantly associated with a lower relapse-free survival rate (P=0.058). In the 343 cases of luminal type, the membrane mesothelin expression-positive group had significantly worse prognosis than the membrane mesothelin-expression-negative group (P=0.042). There was no significant difference in the relapse-free survival rate according to the membrane mesothelin expression status in the triple-negative type and other types. It was suggested that membrane mesothelin expression in luminal type breast cancer is associated with a lower rate of relapse-free survival.

Comparison between AJCC 8th prognostic stage and UICC anatomical stage in patients with primary breast cancer: a single institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) proposed a prognostic stage (PS), which included not only anatomical factors, but also biological factors. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological significance of the PS and to compare PS and anatomical stage (AS) that has been established by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). METHODS: Between 2002 and 2017, 800 patients were included in the study. Patients were classified using pathological UICC AS and pathological AJCC PS. The usefulness of PS in comparison with AS was validated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: A total of 401 (50.1%) patients had pathological AS I, 324 (40.5%) had AS II, and 75 (9.4%) had AS III. Meanwhile, 535 (66.8%) had pathological PS I, 163 (20.4%) had PS II, and 102 (12.8%) had PS III. The number of AS II cases was 1.99-fold higher than that of PS II cases. For each stage, these survival curves were almost similar between AS and PS classification. Therefore, many patients to be classified into stage I and stage III were included in AS II group, while many patients to be classified into stage II were included in AS I group. To trichotomize the survival groups, PS appeared to be more specific than AS, and AIC and C-index confirmed the speculation. CONCLUSION: For the prognostication of primary breast cancer patients, AJCC PS appeared to be able to stratify the cases more appropriately than UICC AS.

Utility of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Fusion Imaging for Prediction of Metastasis to Sentinel and Nonsentinel Nodes in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) is an important diagnostic tool in breast cancer. The utility of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of primary tumors has been evaluated to predict sentinel node (SN) and non-SN metastasis in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 414 cN0 patients. The following parameters were evaluated: SUVmax at 60 min (SUVmax1), SUVmax at 120 min (SUVmax2), percent change between SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 (ΔSUVmax%), SN metastasis foci maximum size (SN meta size), and ratio of metastatic SNs to total SNs or SN ratio (SNR). It was assessed whether these were risk factors for SN metastasis. The relationship between these parameters and the status of SN and/or non-SN metastasis was retrospectively explored to predict non-SN metastasis. RESULTS: All SUV parameters significantly correlated with pathological T factor (pT), nuclear grade, lymphatic invasion (Ly), and Ki-67 labeling index. On multivariate analysis, pT and Ly were independent predictive factors for SN metastasis. In SN meta-positive cases, SN meta size, SNR, and ΔSUVmax% were predictors for non-SN metastasis on univariate analyses, and the former two were independent predictors on multivariate analysis. The combination of SUVmax2 and ΔSUVmax% was an independent predictor of non-SN metastasis (P = 0.0312) and was associated with prediction of non-SN metastasis negative status with high probability (92.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cN0 breast cancer, SUV parameters of the primary tumor were correlated with pathological features. The combination of SUVmax2 and ΔSUVmax% may be useful for predicting non-SN metastasis.

Dual time point 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the percentage change between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at 60 min (SUVmax1) and SUVmax at 120 min (SUVmax2) (ΔSUVmax%) using dual time point 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in breast cancer. METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-four patients with primary breast cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging. ΔSUVmax% was defined as (SUVmax2 - SUVmax1) / SUVmax1 × 100. We explored the optimal cutoff value of SUVmax parameters (SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax%) referring to the event of relapse by using receiver operator characteristic curves. The clinicopathological and prognostic significances of the SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% were analyzed by Cox's univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% were 3.4 and 12.5, respectively. Relapse-free survival (RFS) curves were significantly different between high and low SUVmax1 groups (P = 0.0003) and also between high and low ΔSUVmax% groups (P = 0.0151). In Cox multivariate analysis for RFS, SUVmax1 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0267) but ΔSUVmax% was not (P = 0.152). There was a weak correlation between SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% (P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.166). On combining SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax%, the subgroups of high SUVmax1 and high ΔSUVmax% showed significantly worse prognosis than the other groups in terms of RFS (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation can be a useful method for predicting relapse in patients with breast cancer. The combination of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% was able to identify subgroups with worse prognosis more accurately than SUVmax1 alone.

Metachronous bilateral triple-negative breast cancer associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: A case report.

The present study reports a case of metachronous bilateral breast cancer associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). A 67-year-old female, who had undergone a radical mastectomy of the left breast 34 years ago due to breast cancer, presented with a tumor of the right breast. The clinical stage of the original breast cancer was T2N0M0 stage IIA and adjuvant chemotherapy had not been not administered. With regard to the right-sided breast tumor, on physical examination, multiple neurofibromas and café-au-lait spots were found to be scattered over the skin. A 2-cm tumor was palpable. The preoperative histopathological diagnosis of the right-sided breast tumor was invasive ductal carcinoma, T2N0M0 stage IIA, with negative results for hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. The patient underwent a modified radical mastectomy and axillary node dissection, and received adjuvant chemotherapy. The bilateral tumors were similar in histology and immunophenotype, each being histological grade 3, triple-negative and with a basal-like subtype. Based on a literature review of 90 breast cancers in 84 patients with NF1 (84 patients, 90 breasts), younger age onset, advanced clinical stage and hormone receptor negativity were characteristic features. Bilateral cancer occurred in 8.3% of patients and was characterized by ER negativity, earlier stage and younger age compared with patients with unilateral cancer.

High levels of DJ-1 protein and isoelectric point 6.3 isoform in sera of breast cancer patients.

In patients with cancer and Parkinson's disease, the DJ-1 protein may be secreted into the serum during the impaired response of the underlying cell-protective mechanisms. In order to determine the clinical significance of DJ-1 protein in the sera of breast cancer patients, we examined blood samples from a breast cancer group (n = 180) and a non-cancerous control group (n = 300). Higher levels of DJ-1 were detected in the breast cancer group (mean level, 42.7 ng/mL) than the control group (28.3 ng/mL) by ELISA (P = 0.019). Higher DJ-1 levels were significantly associated with advanced clinical grade, according to the TNM classification, negative hormone receptor status, and high Ki-67 labeling index, of biopsied materials; samples showed low DJ-1 protein expression despite upregulated DJ-1 mRNA. DJ-1 isoforms could be detected clearly in 17 blood samples (from 11 breast cancer patients, and 6 non-cancerous controls) by 2-D gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. The isoform at the pI of 6.3 showed the highest intensity in all 11 cancer cases. Conversely, in the 6 non-cancerous cases, isoforms other than the pI 6.3 isoform were highly expressed, and there was a significant difference in the isoform pattern between breast cancer cases and controls (P = 0.00025). These data indicate that high levels of DJ-1, probably of isoform at pI 6.3, is a candidate serum marker of breast cancer.

The expression and clinical significance of ribophorin II (RPN2) in human breast cancer.

Ribophorin II (RPN2), part of the N-oligosaccharyltransferase complex, is highly expressed in breast cancer stem cells and is associated with tumor metastasis through interaction with mutant p53. The clinicopathological implication of RPN2 expression is undetermined. We examined immunohistochemically the expression levels of RPN2 and p53 in primary breast cancer tissues surgically resected from 218 patients. The correlations of RPN2 expression with the intrinsic subtype defined by hormone receptors (HRs) and HER2, clinicopathological parameters, p53 expression, and patients' clinical outcomes were examined. RPN2 was positive in 139 (64%), and the incidence of RPN2 expression was higher in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HR-/HER2-) (65%) and HER2-enriched (HR-/HER2+) subtype (95%) than in the luminal A-like (HR+/HER2-) subtype (58%) (P = 0.0009). RPN2 expression was also correlated with p53 nuclear accumulation (P = 0.04). The RPN2-positive/p53-positive patient group showed significantly poorer prognosis than the RPN2-negative group for disease-free survival (P = 0.05) and for overall survival (P = 0.02). By multivariate analyses, the combination of RPN2 and p53 was not an independent prognostic factor. RPN2 expression was correlated with clinically aggressive features of breast cancer. These data support the further clinical application of anti-RPN2 therapy and the development of personalized medicine.

Nucleostemin expression in invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the cancer stem cell hypothesis has become widely accepted. Cancer stem cells are thought to possess the ability to undergo self-renewal and differentiation, similar to normal stem cells. Nucleostemin (NS), initially cloned from rat neural stem cells, binds to various proteins, including p53, in the nucleus and is thought to be a key molecule for stemness. NS is expressed in various types of cancers; therefore, its role in cancer pathogenesis is thought to be important. This study was conducted to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic impact of NS in invasive breast cancers. METHOD: The correlation between NS immunoreactivity and clinicopathological parameters was examined in 220 consecutive surgically resected invasive breast cancer tissue samples by using tissue microarrays. The presence of nuclear NS and p53 immunoreactivity in 10% or more of cancer cells was considered as a positive result. RESULTS: Among the 220 patients, 154 were hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, 22 HER2-positive/HR-negative, and 44 HR-negative/HER2-negative. One hundred and forty-two tumors (64.5%) showed NS positivity, and this positivity was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) (P = 0.050), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (P = 0.021), and p53 (P = 0.031) positivity. The patients with NS-positive tumors showed significantly shorter disease-free survival than those with NS-negative tumors. Furthermore, the patient group with NS- and p53-positive tumors showed significantly poorer prognosis than other patient groups. Multivariate analysis showed that NS status was an independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSIONS: NS may play a significant role in the determination of breast cancer progression in association with p53 alterations. The NS status of patients with luminal and HER2 type breast cancers may be a useful prognostic marker.

A simple immunohistochemical panel comprising 2 conventional markers, Ki67 and p53, is a powerful tool for predicting patient outcome in luminal-type breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ki67 is widely used in order to distinguish the "A" and "B" subtypes of luminal-type breast cancer. This study aimed to validate the prognostic value of adding p53 to Ki67 for characterizing luminal-type breast cancer. METHODS: Immunostaining for Ki67, p53, and the molecular markers HER2, CK5/6, CK14, EGFR, FOXA1, GATA3, and P-cadherin was examined hormone receptor (HR)-positive cancer tissues from 150 patients. The prognostic value of an immunohistochemical panel comprising Ki67 and p53 was compared with that of the single Ki67 labeling index (LI), and uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Division of the patients based on the immunohistochemistry results into favorable- (low Ki67 LI, p53-negative) and unfavorable- (high Ki67 LI and/or p53-positive) phenotype groups yielded distinctly different Kaplan-Meier's curves of both disease-free (P<0.0001) and overall survival (P=0.0007). These differences were much more distinct than those between the corresponding low Ki67 LI vs. high Ki67LI curves. While the prognostic values of the other molecular markers were not significant, combined Ki67-p53 status was an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that an immunohistochemical panel comprising Ki67 and p53 is a practical tool for management of patients with HR-positive breast cancer.

Clinical implications of occult metastases and isolated tumor cells in sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients: serial step section analysis with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to clarify retrospectively the clinical significance of occult metastases in both sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and non-SLNs in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 109 (80.1%) of 136 women with breast cancer who had consecutively undergone SLN biopsy (176 lymph nodes) were intraoperatively diagnosed as being free of SLN involvement. SLNs were routinely examined by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining of one to four frozen sections per node. Sixty-four (58.7%) of these patients also underwent backup axillary dissection. For the 109 patients, all formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of SLNs and non-SLNs were entirely cut into 5-µm-thick sections. All serial step sections at 85-µm intervals were stained with HE and immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratin. RESULTS: Occult metastases in SLNs and non-SLNs were detected in 25 (23%) and 10 (16%) patients, respectively. The presence of occult SLN metastasis was marginally correlated with T-factor (P=0.06), and predictive factors for occult non-SLN metastases were tumor nuclear grade (P=0.039). With a median follow-up of 86 months, disease-free survival (P=0.3) or overall survival (P=0.8) did not differ between the patients with and without occult SLN metastases, regardless of backup axillary lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: SLN or non-SLN occult metastases detected by serial step sections at 85-µm intervals did not have significant prognostic implications.

Expression pattern of stromal cell-derived factor-1 chemokine in invasive breast cancer is correlated with estrogen receptor status and patient prognosis.

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 is known to be crucially involved in tumor progression, but the role of its ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), remains unclear. The present study was conducted to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic impact of SDF-1 expression in invasive breast cancers. Expression of SDF-1 mRNA and protein was examined in five breast cancer cell lines with or without estradiol treatment. In 52 surgically resected breast cancers, the level of SDF-1 mRNA in frozen samples and the pattern of SDF-1 protein immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were compared. In another cohort of 223 breast cancers, the correlation between SDF-1 immunoreactivity and clinicopathological parameters was examined using a tissue microarray. Estradiol treatment markedly increased the expression of SDF-1 mRNA and protein in the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cell lines, MCF-7 and T47D. Among the 52 resected breast cancers, those with a cytoplasmic-dominant pattern of SDF-1 expression showed higher SDF-1 mRNA levels (median 27.4) than those with a membrane-dominant or negative pattern (median 13.6, P = 0.0017). Accordingly, the cytoplasmic-dominant pattern was defined as "high SDF-1 expression," and other patterns were defined as "low SDF-1 expression." Among the cohort of 223 tumors, "high SDF-1 expression" was detected in 158 (70.9%) and was significantly correlated with ER positivity (P < 0.0001), HER2 negativity (P = 0.021), and lower grade (P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated that "high SDF-1 expression" was a significant indicator of better clinical outcome in both the entire patient cohort (P = 0.017) and the 133 patients with ER-positive tumors (P = 0.036), but not in the 90 patients with ER-negative tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that SDF-1 status was an independent factor related to overall survival in patients with ER-positive tumors (P = 0.046). SDF-1 status is a significant prognostic factor and may be clinically useful for assigning adjuvant therapy to patients with ER-positive invasive breast cancers.

Vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA levels quantified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in microdissected breast carcinoma tissues are correlated with histological type and grade of both invasive and intraductal components.

In breast cancer, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a prognostic factor, but the relationship of VEGF mRNA levels with various parameters or tumor progression is unclear. VEGF mRNA levels were measured in 48 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma by using laser capture microdissection and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The mean VEGF mRNA levels were compared among different histological types and grades in 41 and 29 samples of invasive and intraductal components, respectively. VEGF mRNA levels were always higher in cancerous cells than in non-cancerous cells, but mean VEGF mRNA levels were not significantly different between invasive component (3.24 +/- 3.18-fold the value of non-cancerous tissue) and intraductal component (4.14 +/- 4.43-fold). They were higher in papillotubular type than in other types, and higher in grade 2 carcinomas than in grade 3 carcinomas of invasive component, and higher in comedo type than in other types of intraductal component. Mean VEGF mRNA levels were higher in the VEGF-immunopositive group than in the VEGF-immunonegative group. There was no correlation between VEGF mRNA levels and tumor size, nodal status, or hormone receptor status. VEGF expression may play an important role in the development of both invasive and intraductal carcinoma components, especially those carcinoma components of less aggressive histological features.