Efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin in Japanese patients with otorhinolaryngological infections.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections, we conducted three studies: a tissue penetration study with patients scheduled to undergo otorhinolaryngological tissue removal, an open-label study comprising patients with otitis media, pharyngitis, laryngitis, and tonsillitis, and a non-inferiority study compared with high-dose cefcapene-pivoxil (CFPN-PI). METHODS: Tissue penetration study; 17 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic otitis media, chronic tonsillitis, or palatine tonsillar hypertrophy, who required resection or removal of their tissue, were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally, and otorhinolaryngological tissues were collected 3.5-6 h after drug administration; blood was collected within 15 min before and after drug administration. The collected tissues and blood concentrations were measured at a central laboratory. Open-label study; 55 patients who were diagnosed with acute otitis media, laryngopharyngitis, or tonsillitis were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally 800 mg on Day 1, while on days 2-7, 400 mg of the drug was administered once daily. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at Test-of-Cure (TOC: 5-10 days after completion) Non-inferiority study; 283 patients with acute rhinosinusitis or acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis were randomized into either the solithromycin group or CFPN-PI group. Solithromycin was administered 800 mg once daily on Day 1 and 400 mg once daily while on Days 2-7 in solithromycin group, and CFPN-PI was administered 150 mg three times a day while on Days 1-7 in CFPN-PI group. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at TOC. RESULTS: In the tissue penetration study, the tissue concentration ratios (tissue concentration/plasma concentration) of solithromycin were 4.19 in the sinonasal mucosa, 1.33 in the middle ear mucosa, and 6.12 in the palatine tonsil tissue. In the open-label study, the efficacy rates at the TOC were 97.0 % for acute otitis media, 100 % for laryngopharyngitis, and 81.8 % for tonsillitis. In the non-inferiority study comprising patients with rhinosinusitis, the efficacy rate at the TOC was 87.7 % for solithromycin and 89.7 % for CFPN-PI. The difference in the efficacy rate (95 % confidence interval) was -2.0 % (-9.4 % to 5.4 %), verifying the non-inferiority of solithromycin to CFPN-PI. The most common adverse events in patients administered solithromycin were diarrhea (20.7 %), nausea and nasopharyngitis (3.6 %,), pharyngitis and elevated hepatic function test results (3.1 %), and abnormal hepatic function (2.1 %). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings, it is suggested that solithromycin is useful for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections.

Findings from a discontinued clinical trial of favipiravir in high-risk patients with early-onset COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Favipiravir terminates severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. Accordingly, early administration of favipiravir to SARS-CoV-2-infected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may be expected to suppress disease progression. METHODS: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted to demonstrate efficacy of favipiravir in reducing disease progression in patients with mild COVID-19. The participants were unvaccinated patients with comorbidities and at risk of progression to severe disease. Patients were enrolled within 72 h of disease onset and randomized to receive either favipiravir (1800 mg/dose on Day 1 followed by 800 mg/dose) or matching placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients requiring oxygen therapy within 28 days of randomization. RESULTS: The trial was discontinued after enrolling 84 patients due to slower than anticipated enrollment caused by rapid uptake of SARS-CoV-2-vaccines and the emergence of the Omicron variant. Results from the 84 patients demonstrated no significant difference in all clinical outcomes. In post-hoc analyses, favipiravir treatment showed higher efficacy in patients within 48 h of onset. No deaths or severe adverse events were documented in the favipiravir group. Plasma concentrations of favipiravir from Day 2 onward were maintained above 40 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting clinical trials for pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 that rapidly accumulate mutations leading to altered disease characteristics carries significant risks unless it can be done in a short period. Therefore, it would be important to prepare the comprehensive clinical trial platform that can appropriately and promptly evaluate drugs even under a pandemic.