Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(132): 1133-7, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26158176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The number of the eldest elderly (aged 85 years and older) patients with gastric cancer has been rising in Japan. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has been accepted as a less invasive treatment for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LADG for eldest elderly patents. METHODOLOGY: From January 2006 to July 2010, 262 patients underwent LADG for gastric cancer. Of these, 9 patients were 85 years old and over (eldest elderly group) and the remaining 253 patients were younger than 85 years (control group). Clinicopathological characteristics and operative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among clinicopathological characteristics analyzed in this study (gender, body mass index, co-morbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and tumor status), only gender showed a significant difference between the eldest elderly and the control groups. There were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, postoperative complication and postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups. No serious complications or mortality were found in the eldest elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that LADG is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of gastric cancer, even in eldest elderly patients.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 28(1): 120-3, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15635175

RESUMEN

We investigated contamination of environmental surfaces by Staphylococcus aureus from April 1 to the end of June in 2002 in the dermatological ward (37 beds) of a university hospital. For surfaces contaminated by high levels of S. aureus, disinfection methods were evaluated. 100-10(5) colony forming units (cfu) of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) were detected on items such as an immersion bathtub (examined area, about 900 cm2), foot washbowl, stretcher for an immersion bath, and chair for the shower. After disinfection, no S. aureus was detected on smooth surfaces such as the immersion bathtub and foot washbowl; however, S. aureus was detected even after disinfection on porous surfaces made of sponge-like materials (polyethylene foam) such as the stretcher for the immersion bath and the shower chair. Scanning electron microscopy of the porous surfaces showed formation of a large amount of coccus and bacillus biofilms on the walls of pores in the multi-pore structure. Material that is porous should not be used in patient care settings because it is not possible to disinfect it properly.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Departamentos de Hospitales , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Desinfección/métodos , Hospitales Universitarios , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus aureus/ultraestructura
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA