Anti-wrinkle effect of bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1a-extracellular domain (BMPR1a-ECD).

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have diverse and important roles in the proliferation and differentiation of adult stem cells in our tissues. Especially, BMPs are well known to be the main inducers of bone formation, by facilitating both proliferation and differentiation of bone stem cells. Interestingly, in skin stem cells, BMPs repress their proliferation but are indispensable for the proper differentiation into several lineages of skin cells. Here, we tested whether BMP antagonists have an effect on the prevention of wrinkle formation. For this study we used an in vivo wrinkle-induced mouse model. As a positive control, retinoic acid, one of the top anti-wrinkle effectors, showed a 44% improvement compared to the non-treated control. Surprisingly, bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1a extracellular domain (BMPR1a-ECD) exhibited an anti-wrinkle effect which was 6-fold greater than that of retinoic acid. Our results indicate that BMP antagonists will be good targets for skin or hair diseases.

The divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ play specific roles in stabilizing histone-DNA interactions within nucleosomes that are partially redundant with the core histone tail domains.

We previously reported that reconstituted nucleosomes undergo sequence-dependent translational repositioning upon removal of the core histone tail domains under physiological conditions, indicating that the tails influence the choice of position. We report here that removal of the core histone tail domains increases the exposure of the DNA backbone in nucleosomes to hydroxyl radicals, a nonbiased chemical cleavage reagent, indicative of an increase in the motility of the DNA on the histone surface. Moreover, we demonstrate that the divalent cations Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) can replace the role of the tail domains with regard to stabilization of histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome core and restrict repositioning of nucleosomes upon tail removal. However, when nucleosomes were incubated with Mg(2+) after tail removal, the original distribution of translational positions was not re-established, indicating that divalent cations increase the energy barrier between translational positions rather than altering the free energy differences between positions. Interestingly, other divalent cations such as Zn(2+), Fe(2+), Co(2+), and Mn(2+) had little or no effect on the stability of histone-DNA interactions within tailless nucleosomes. These results support the idea that specific binding sites for Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) ions exist within the nucleosome and play a critical role in nucleosome stability that is partially redundant with the core histone tail domains.

The core histone tail domains contribute to sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning.

The precise positioning of nucleosomes plays a critical role in the regulation of gene expression by modulating the DNA binding activity of trans-acting factors. However, molecular determinants responsible for positioning are not well understood. We examined whether the removal of the core histone tail domains from nucleosomes reconstituted with specific DNA fragments led to alteration of translational positions. Remarkably, we find that removal of tail domains from a nucleosome assembled on a DNA fragment containing a Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S RNA gene results in repositioning of nucleosomes along the DNA, including two related major translational positions that move about 20 bp further upstream with respect to the 5S gene. In a nucleosome reconstituted with a DNA fragment containing the promoter of a Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene, several translational positions shifted by about 10 bp along the DNA upon tail removal. However, the positions of nucleosomes assembled with a DNA fragment known to have one of the highest binding affinities for core histone proteins in the mouse genome were not altered by removal of core histone tail domains. Our data support the notion that the basic tail domains bind to nucleosomal DNA and influence the selection of the translational position of nucleosomes and that once tails are removed movement between translational positions occurs in a facile manner on some sequences. However, the effect of the N-terminal tails on the positioning and movement of a nucleosome appears to be dependent on the DNA sequence such that the contribution of the tails can be masked by very high affinity DNA sequences. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning can be specifically altered by regulated changes in histone tail-DNA interactions in chromatin.

(CAG)(n)-hairpin DNA binds to Msh2-Msh3 and changes properties of mismatch recognition.

Cells have evolved sophisticated DNA repair systems to correct damaged DNA. However, the human DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2-Msh3 is involved in the process of trinucleotide (CNG) DNA expansion rather than repair. Using purified protein and synthetic DNA substrates, we show that Msh2-Msh3 binds to CAG-hairpin DNA, a prime candidate for an expansion intermediate. CAG-hairpin binding inhibits the ATPase activity of Msh2-Msh3 and alters both nucleotide (ADP and ATP) affinity and binding interfaces between protein and DNA. These changes in Msh2-Msh3 function depend on the presence of A.A mispaired bases in the stem of the hairpin and on the hairpin DNA structure per se. These studies identify critical functional defects in the Msh2-Msh3-CAG hairpin complex that could misdirect the DNA repair process.

The core histone N-terminal tail domains negatively regulate binding of transcription factor IIIA to a nucleosome containing a 5S RNA gene via a novel mechanism.

Reconstitution of a DNA fragment containing a 5S RNA gene from Xenopus borealis into a nucleosome greatly restricts binding of the primary 5S transcription factor, TFIIIA. Consistent with transcription experiments using reconstituted templates, removal of the histone tail domains stimulates TFIIIA binding to the 5S nucleosome greater than 100-fold. However, we show that tail removal increases the probability of 5S DNA unwrapping from the core histone surface by only approximately fivefold. Moreover, using site-specific histone-to-DNA cross-linking, we show that TFIIIA binding neither induces nor requires nucleosome movement. Binding studies with COOH-terminal deletion mutants of TFIIIA and 5S nucleosomes reconstituted with native and tailless core histones indicate that the core histone tail domains play a direct role in restricting the binding of TFIIIA. Deletion of only the COOH-terminal transcription activation domain dramatically stimulates TFIIIA binding to the native nucleosome, while further C-terminal deletions or removal of the tail domains does not lead to further increases in TFIIIA binding. We conclude that the unmodified core histone tail domains directly negatively influence TFIIIA binding to the nucleosome in a manner that requires the C-terminal transcription activation domain of TFIIIA. Our data suggest an additional mechanism by which the core histone tail domains regulate the binding of trans-acting factors in chromatin.

Large scale preparation of nucleosomes containing site-specifically chemically modified histones lacking the core histone tail domains.

The core histone tail domains are critical regulators of chromatin structure and function and modifications such as acetylation of lysine residues within the tails are central to this regulation. Studies have shown that the removal of core histone tail domains by trypsinization in which one-half to two-thirds of each core histone tail domain are removed in gross aspects mimics the acetylation of core histone tails. In addition, removal of the tails has been useful in understanding general tail function. Thus, removal of native core histone tails by trypsinization is a widely used method. In addition, many in vitro studies now employ core histones site-specifically modified with photo activatable cross-linking probes or fluorescent probes. However, in our experience, standard methods employing trypsinized donor chromatin for reconstitution of nucleosomes containing certain chemically modified histones lacking the core histone tail domains are not uniformly applicable. Here, we describe various methods for preparing nucleosomes containing a core histone modified with a cross-linking agent, APB, and lacking the core histone tail domains.

Structural features of transcription factor IIIA bound to a nucleosome in solution.

Assembly of a DNA fragment containing a Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S RNA gene into a nucleosome greatly restricts binding of the 5S gene-specific transcription factor IIIA (TFIIIA) to the 5S internal promoter. However, TFIIIA binds with high affinity to 5S nucleosomes lacking the N-terminal tail domains of the core histones or to nucleosomes in which these domains are hyperacetylated. The degree to which tail acetylation or removal improves TFIIIA binding cannot be simply explained by a commensurate change in the general accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. In order to investigate the molecular basis of how TFIIIA binds to the nucleosome and to ascertain if binding involves all nine zinc fingers and/or displacement of histone-DNA interactions, we examined the TFIIIA-nucleosome complex by hydroxyl radical footprinting and site-directed protein-DNA cross-linking. Our data reveal that the first six fingers of TFIIIA bind and displace approximately 20 bp of histone-DNA interactions at the periphery of the nucleosome, while binding of fingers 7 to 9 appears to overlap with histone-DNA interactions. Molecular modeling based on these results and the crystal structures of a nucleosome core and a TFIIIA-DNA cocomplex yields a precise picture of the ternary complex and a potentially important intermediate in the transition from naïve chromatin structure to productive polymerase III transcription complex.

Xenopus transcription factor IIIA and the 5S nucleosome: development of a useful in vitro system.

5S RNA genes in Xenopus are regulated during development via a complex interplay between assembly of repressive chromatin structures and productive transcription complexes. Interestingly, 5S genes have been found to harbor powerful nucleosome positioning elements and therefore have become an important model system for reconstitution of eukaryotic genes into nucleosomes in vitro. Moreover, the structure of the primary factor initiating transcription of 5S DNA, transcription factor IIIA, has been extensively characterized. This has allowed for numerous studies of the effect of nucleosome assembly and histone modifications on the DNA binding activity of a transcription factor in vitro. For example, linker histones bind 5S nucleosomes and repress TFIIIA binding in vitro in a similar manner to that observed in vivo. In addition, TFIIIA binding to nucleosomes assembled with 5S DNA is stimulated by acetylation or removal of the core histone tail domains. Here we review the development of the Xenopus 5S in vitro system and discuss recent results highlighting new aspects of transcription factor - nucleosome interactions,

R2 retrotransposition on assembled nucleosomes depends on the translational position of the target site.

R2 retrotransposons insert into the 28S rRNA genes of insects. Integration occurs by specific cleavage of the target site and utilization of the released DNA end to prime reverse transcription of the RNA transcript. Specificity of the protein to the target site is dependent upon nucleotide sequence recognition extending from 35 bp upstream to 15 bp downstream of the cleavage site. In this report, we show that sequence recognition and cleavage by the R2 protein can occur while the target site is assembled into nucleosomes. Reconstitution of DNA fragments containing the 28S gene sequence into a set of nucleosomes with different translational frames revealed that the R2 site adopted the same rotational orientation with respect to the histone octamer. Binding and cleavage by the R2 protein were most efficient when the upstream binding site for the R2 protein was near a nucleosome end. Interaction of the R2 protein with the nucleosome disrupted the histone:DNA contacts in the 50 bp region directly bound by R2, but did not modify the remainder of the nucleosome structure.