RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze patterns of failure and disease volume-treatment outcomes in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with definitive radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre in northeast India. METHODS: From February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proved non-metastatic NPC patients treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves compared outcome variables based on ROC analysis-classified tumor volume. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 25.4 months (17.3-39.2), 35(35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-three patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10% and 74.10% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in LRFS according to T staging (p < 0.0001). Gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross nodal volume (GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7 mL and 3.7 and 39.2 mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p = 0.03) and GTVn (p = 0.00024). CONCLUSIONS: For NPC patients who undergo curative IMRT, primary tumour and nodal volumes are independent prognostic indicators. GTVp and GTVn are highly predictive of local control, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.
RESUMEN
Purpose This study compares the dosimetry and dose sparing of cardiac substructures in single isocenter and dual isocenter RapidArc™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, United States) radiotherapy planning for synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Methodology Six synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) patients received adjuvant radiation with the prescribed dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV) without local lymph nodal regions. PTVs and organs at risk (OARs), including both lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, heart, and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), both atria and ventricles were contoured. Single isocentric RapidArc (SIRA) and dual isocentric RapidArc (DIRA) plans were made for each patient and dosimetric differences between these two techniques were evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant difference in conformity index (CI) values between SIRA and DIRA plans, with 0.9681±0.01 and 0.9721±0.01 (p=0.505), respectively. SIRA planning showed superior homogeneity with homogeneity Index (HI) values of 0.0999±0.01 compared to DIRA planning with HI values of 0.1640±0.12 (p=0.230). The mean LAD dose of SIRA was valued higher than that of DIRA planning. Lower mean doses were obtained for both lungs in SIRA plans compared to DIRA plans. Meanwhile, doses to the right atrium, left atrium, left ventricle, right ventricle, and esophagus showed no statistical significance between these two techniques, except in the spinal cord. Conclusion Both SIRA and DIRA plans have satisfactory outcomes in sparing OARs. Meanwhile, SIRA techniques have less setup time and overall machine time.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) are highly fatal tumors despite advanced multimodality management. They are also associated with neurocognitive impairment, both due to disease pathology and treatment. We aimed to assess various risk factors responsible for neurocognitive decline in HGG patients undergoing adjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: Newly diagnosed HGG patients who underwent maximal safe resection were included. Patients received volumetric modulated arc therapy to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, along with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) at a dose of 75 mg/m²/day orally; thereafter adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m² for 5 days), given every 28 days for 6 to 8 cycles. The Mini-Mental State Examination questionnaire was used to measure cognitive impairment of each study patient at various time points. Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariable analysis of data to establish possible risk factors. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled and analyzed. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 30 patients (56.6%) developed cognitive impairment, and 23 patients (43.4%) did not. On univariate analysis, HGG with WHO grade 4, glioblastoma and diffuse midline glioma histology, IDH-wild type, recursive partitioning analysis class IV/V, and only biopsy of primary tumor were significantly associated with neurocognitive impairment, but none of them were independent risk factors on multivariable analysis. Planning target volume and dose received by ipsilateral hippocampus were also significantly correlated with cognitive decline in HGG patients. CONCLUSION: Decline in neurocognitive functions in HGG patients is multifactorial and can be attributed to an amalgam of various tumor, patient, and treatment-related factors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among cancer patients in India. OBJECTIVE: The present study elucidated usage patterns of CAM and the factors responsible for its adoption among the patients with cancer, and the therapeutic impact of CAM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based study, conducted among patients with cancer in a tertiary care hospital in a sub-Himalayan city. Data were analyzed using statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 2614 patients with cancer were included. Almost half of the patients (n = 1208, 46.2%) reported to have been treated with CAM. Breast cancer (n = 274, 23.0%) was most prevalent with majority at advanced stages. Ayurveda (n = 428, 35.9%) Yoga/Naturopathy (n = 381, 32.0%) Homeopathy (n = 143, 12.0%) and Unani (n = 71, 5.9%) were used commonly. Among CAM users, 85.0% (n = 1012) of patients used CAM as the sole method of treatment, while 58.9% (n = 702) patients reported initial symptomatic benefit. CONCLUSION: Using CAM benefitted a significant number of patients with cancer. However, there is an urgent need to integrate CAM with modern system of medicine.
