Improving Male Chin and Mandible Eesthetics.

The size and shape of the chin and mandible are fundamental to sexual dimorphism. Deficiencies in these structures distract from the male facial esthetic. When deficient, these areas of the facial skeleton can be augmented by alloplastic augmentation or skeletal rearrangement. This article discusses these alternatives with emphasis on the design and techniques of alloplastic skeletal augmentation.

Role of the Pedicled Mentalis Muscle Flap in Closure of Chin Implants in Genioplasty.

With the purpose of obtaining an aesthetically pleasing chin appearance, genioplasty or chin augmentation can be performed through osteotomy or chin implantation, with the latter available in different sizes and materials such as silicone and porous polyethylene. The implants are traditionally placed in a subperiosteal or supraperiosteal plane with different advantages and disadvantages to each. This procedure has evolved through time with many techniques and modifications; and this article is an addition to this ongoing refinement by advocating for closure of the mentalis muscle (a paired chin muscle originating from the incisor fossa to the chin skin) over the implant after securing its position with screws (in the case of porous polyethylene) or creating a snug pocket (in the case of silicone). In this retrospective analysis, 15 patients underwent this procedure with an excellent outcome. A single patient developed numbness in the mandibular nerve territory, while another one developed a fistulating radicular cyst that was unrelated to this technique. In addition to the simple learning curve, the potential advantages of this technique include less chances of fistula formation, implant exposure, infection, extrusion, or malpositioning. Prospective studies with more subjects are required to cement our findings.

Changing Mandible Contour Using Computer Designed/Computer Manufactured Alloplastic Implants.

BACKGROUND: The shape of the mandible is the fundamental determinant of the appearance and sexual dimorphism of the lower one-third of the face. Utilization of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) alloplastic implants provides unparalleled planning and sophistication in the correction of skeletal deficiencies, irregularities, and asymmetry. OBJECTIVES: This study presented the rationale, indications, techniques, and results of the senior author's (M.J.Y.) 15-year experience employing CAD/CAM alloplastic implants to correct deficiencies and asymmetries of the mandible. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was reviewed of all patients who underwent aesthetic augmentation of the mandible employing CAD/CAM alloplastic implants by the senior author. RESULTS: Over a 15-year period, 123 patients underwent mandibular augmentation utilizing CAD/CAM alloplastic implants. The majority of patients were men (76.4%) with an average age of 31 years (range, 24-63 years). All implants were bilateral. Complications included infection requiring implant removal (2.4%) and patient dissatisfaction resulting in either implant revision (4.1%) or implant removal (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: As described here, CAD/CAM alloplastic implants are an effective modality to augment aesthetic mandible contour deficiencies.

Pioneers in Modern Craniofacial Surgery: Assessing the Academic Impact of Drs. Joseph Gruss and Paul Manson.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted this study to assess the impact that Drs. Joseph Gruss and Paul Manson have had on craniofacial surgery through their individual contributions and through their trainees. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of fellows trained by either Dr. Gruss or Dr. Manson. Demographic and bibliometric measures were recorded for each fellow. Demographic factors included years since completion of fellowship training, current practice of craniomaxillofacial surgery, academic practice, and academic leadership roles. Bibliometric measures included number of publications, number of citations, and h-index. To adjust for scholarly activity before fellowship training, only contributions published after fellowship training were included. RESULTS: Over a 39-year period, a total of 86 surgeons completed fellowship training with either of the two principal surgeons. The mean time since completion of training was 18.7 ± 11.4 years. Seventy-nine percent of surgeons had active practices in craniomaxillofacial surgery; 54 percent had academic practices. The mean number of publications was 26.4 ± 69.3, the mean number of citations was 582 ± 2406, and the average h-index was 6.7 ± 10.6. Among academic surgeons, the average h-index was 10.7 ± 13.1, 89 percent practiced in North America, 89 percent had active practices in craniomaxillofacial surgery, and nearly 50 percent had achieved a leadership role. CONCLUSIONS: Modern craniofacial reconstruction has evolved from principles used in trauma and correction of congenital differences. The extensive impact that Drs. Paul Manson and Joseph Gruss have had on the field, and plastic surgery at large, is evident through their primary contributions and the immense impact their trainees have had on the field.

Refining Post-Orthognathic Surgery Facial Contour with Computer-Designed/Computer-Manufactured Alloplastic Implants.

BACKGROUND: Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies and sagittal split mandibular osteotomies are performed to correct significant dentofacial deformities. The multidimensional skeletal movements, particularly those of large magnitude, may result in contour irregularities and facial imbalances. METHODS: Three-dimensional images were reconstructed from computed tomographic scans in patients unhappy with their appearances after Le Fort I advancement and/or bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. The data from these scans were used to produce alloplastic implants using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing for surgical correction of contour irregularities and imbalances. These implants were surgically placed through intraoral and submental incisions and fixed using titanium screws. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients underwent implant placement with implants produced using computer-design/computer manufacturing. One patient required removal of implants secondary to infection. All other patients were satisfied with their result. CONCLUSION: The use and surgical placement of implants produced by means of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing has been shown to be effective in refining appearance in 21 patients over a 7-year period with minimal morbidity. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Pyriform Aperture Augmentation as An Adjunct to Rhinoplasty.

Skeletal deficiency in the central midface impacts nasal aesthetics. This lack of lower face projection can be corrected by alloplastic augmentation of the pyriform aperture. Creating convexity in the deficient midface will make the nose seem less prominent. Augmentation of the pyriform aperture is, therefore, often a useful adjunct during the rhinoplasty procedure. Augmenting the skeleton in this area can alter the projection of the nasal base, the nasolabial angle, and the vertical plane of the lip. The implant design and surgical techniques described here are extensions of others' previous efforts to improve paranasal aesthetics.

Occult Histopathology and Its Predictors in Contralateral and Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomies.

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen an increasing prevalence of prophylactic mastectomies with decreasing age of patients treated for breast cancer. Data are limited on the prevalence of histopathologic abnormalities in this population. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of histopathologic findings in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) patients and identify predictors of findings. METHODS: Our institution's prophylactic mastectomies from 2004 to 2011 were reviewed. Breast specimens with prior malignancies were excluded. Patient factors and pathology reports were collected. Independent predictive factors were identified with univariate and multivariate logistic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 524 specimens in 454 patients were identified. Malignancy was found in 7.0% of CPM and 5.7% of BPM specimens. In CPM patients, ipsilateral lobular carcinoma-in situ [odds ratio (OR) 4.0] and mammogram risk group (OR 2.0) were predictive of malignancy. Age group (OR 1.5), ipsilateral lobular carcinoma-in situ (OR 2.3), and prior bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (OR 0.3) were predictive of moderate- to high-risk histopathology. Only increasing age group was predictive of increased moderate- to high-risk histopathology in BPM patients (OR 2.3). There were no independent predictors of malignancy in BPM. BRCA status was not predictive in either CPM or BPM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lobular carcinoma-in situ in the index breast or high-risk mammograms have a higher prevalence of malignancies. Although BRCA patients may benefit from prophylactic mastectomy, the genetic diagnosis does not increase the prevalence of detecting occult pathology. BPM patients can be counseled about relative risk, where occult pathology increases with age.

Lifetime Costs of Prophylactic Mastectomies and Reconstruction versus Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an increasing prevalence of prophylactic mastectomy with decreasing ages of patients treated for breast cancer. Data are limited on the fiscal impacts of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy trends, and no study has compared bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with reconstruction to surveillance in high-risk patients. METHODS: Lifetime third-party payer costs over 30 years were estimated with 2013 Medicare reimbursement rates. Costs were estimated for patients choosing contralateral or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy versus surveillance, with immediate reconstructions using a single-stage implant, tissue expander, or perforator-based free flap approach. Published cancer incidence rates predicted the percentage of surveillance patients that would require mastectomies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted that varied cost growth, discount rate, cancer incidence rate, and other variables. Lifetime costs and present values (3 percent discount rate) were estimated. RESULTS: Lifetime prophylactic mastectomy costs were lower than surveillance costs, $1292 to $1993 lower for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and $15,668 to $21,342 lower for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, depending on the reconstruction. Present value estimates were slightly higher for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy over contralateral surveillance but still cost saving for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy compared with bilateral surveillance. Present value estimates are also cost saving for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy when the modeled contralateral breast cancer incidence rate is increased to at least 0.6 percent per year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with contralateral and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy being cost saving in many scenarios, regardless of the reconstructive option chosen. They suggest that physicians and patients should continue to receive flexibility in deciding how best to proceed clinically in each case.

Are Quantitative Measures of Academic Productivity Correlated with Academic Rank in Plastic Surgery? A National Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between quantitative measures of academic productivity and academic rank among full-time academic plastic surgeons. METHODS: Bibliometric indices were computed for all full-time academic plastic surgeons in the United States. The primary study variable was academic rank. Bibliometric predictors included the Hirsch index, I-10 index, number of publications, number of citations, and highest number of citations for a single publication. Descriptive, bivariate, and correlation analyses were computed. Multiple comparisons testing was used to calculate adjusted associations for subgroups. For all analyses, a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 607 plastic surgeons across 91 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved programs. Of them, 4.1 percent were instructors/lecturers, 43.7 percent were assistant professors, 22.1 percent were associate professors, 25.7 percent were professors, and 4.4 percent were endowed professors. Mean values were as follows: Hirsch index, 10.2 ± 9.0; I-10 index, 17.2 ± 10.2; total number of publications, 45.5 ± 69.4; total number of citations, 725.0 ± 1448.8; and highest number of citations for a single work, 117.8 ± 262.4. Correlation analyses revealed strong associations of the Hirsch index, I-10 index, number of publications, and number of citations with academic rank (rs = 0.62 to 0.64; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Academic rank in plastic surgery is strongly correlated with several quantitative metrics of research productivity. Although academic promotion is the result of success in multiple different areas, bibliometric measures may be useful adjuncts for assessment of research productivity.