Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and migration on tuberculosis notifications: a retrospective analysis with 5-year data from three centers.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the incidence of TB among immigrants and non-immigrants in Sanliurfa, Türkiye between 2018 and 2022 and to examine the effect of COVID-19 on the incidence, location, and drug resistance patterns of tuberculosis. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis in Sanliurfa Tuberculosis Dispensary between January-2018 and May-2022. Patients were assessed in terms of age, sex, site of tuberculosis, and drug resistance profiles before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 887 patients with TB were included in the study. The mean age of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis was 40.63 ± 17.50 years. Of the total number of patients diagnosed, 50.7% were women, 85.8% were Turkish citizens, and 91.9% were new cases. Comparing the rate of positive cultures between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods revealed a statistically significant rate of positive culture during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.001). In terms of mortality, the mean age of the patients who died was 60.2 ± 18.4 years and that of the survivors was 39.1 ± 16.6 years; these values were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Among the patients who survived, the rate of pulmonary tuberculosis was statistically significantly higher than that of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pulmonary TB is high and the proportion of women is increasing. During the COVID-19 period, the number of patients diagnosed with TB decreased, but interestingly, the rate of positive cultures remained high, and the rate of resistance to INH also decreased. The results revealed rates similar to those reported by the World Health Organization.

Association of Osteoarthritis Prevalence With Age and Obesity Factors in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries: Panel Regression Model.

INTRODUCTION: According to cross-sectional analysis studies supported by microdata, incidence of Osteoarthritis increases in parallel with ageing and obesity, which are common predictors of the disease. The aim of this study is to reveal whether ageing and obesity have an effect on the increase in osteoarthritis prevalence by analyzing cross-country data from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. METHODS: We used static panel data regression analysis for 36 countries for the period between 2000 and 2017. Along with osteoarthritis prevalence, we used a group of people with a body mass index ≤ 30 within the population as obesity indicator and those older than 65 yrs within the population as ageing indicator. We calculated the effect of ageing and obesity on osteoarthritis prevalence using STATA 13 software. RESULTS: Both variable coefficients, age, and obesity, respectively, were found to be positive and statistically significant at the 1% level. This study shows that both ageing and obesity contribute to an increase in the osteoarthritis prevalence based on macro data from 36 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have significant implications that can be used by both the public and policymakers for preventing the osteoarthritis. Adopting the preventive measures could contribute to decrease in health expenditures.

Oral corticosteroids vs. exercises on treatment of frozen shoulder: a randomized, single-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Many treatment strategies have been described for the management of frozen shoulder. However, to date no randomized controlled trial has directly compared the efficacy of exercise and oral corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to determine whether pain, range of motion (ROM), and function differ between patients with frozen shoulder randomized to treatment with exercise or oral corticosteroids. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of exercise and oral corticosteroids in patients with frozen shoulder. Overall, 33 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either exercise (n = 17) or oral corticosteroids (n = 16). The exercise was applied 2 times per week for 6 weeks for 12 visits; patients in the oral corticosteroids group received prednisolone for 4 weeks. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks and at the 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment, ROM, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance with baseline scores as the covariates was used to determine between-group differences. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using the multiple imputation method to impute values for all missing data. RESULTS: Planned pairwise comparisons demonstrated significant improvements in pain relief and functional outcomes in both groups at the 6- and 12-week follow-ups compared to baseline. There were no significant time-by-group interactions between-group differences noted for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (F = 0.470, P = .93), visual analog scale (F = 0.006, P = .94), flexion ROM (F = 2.78, P = .1), internal rotation ROM (F = 3.440, P = .07) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (F = 0.470, P = .49). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance using baseline scores as a covariate was significant for the abduction range (F = 4.460, P = .04) and external rotation ROM (F = 12.100, P = .002) in favor of the exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that while both groups achieved significant improvements at the 6-, and 12-week follow-ups, the exercise group was superior in terms of abduction and external rotation ROM. Additionally, even though both groups were improved, the effect sizes were larger in the exercise group. Considering the systemic side effects of oral corticosteroids, even at low doses, a well-planned exercise program that considers pain may be a good option for frozen shoulder.

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022. DATA SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19. DATA EXTRACTION: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients.

Effectiveness of therapeutic electromyographic biofeedback after orthopedic knee surgeries: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To present an evidence-based overview of the current utilization and the effectiveness of therapeutic Electromyographic Biofeedback (EMG-BF) in rehabilitation after orthopedic knee surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE (PubMed), PEDro, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to June 20, 2020. RESULTS: Eight RCTs investigating effectiveness of the EMG-BF in rehabilitation after orthopedic knee surgeries were identified. The quality scores for included studies ranged from 6 to 8 on PEDro Scale. Most of the included studies reported that EMG-BF was more effective compared to home exercises, standard rehabilitation program or electrical stimulation for improving quadriceps strength or activation. Besides, EMG-BF was revealed positive results in functional assessments except gait velocity and IKDC. Only two studies reported knee ROMs were significantly improved in favour of EMG-BF. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that EMG-BF seems to control pain and improve quadriceps femoris strength and functionality. However, the results are inconclusive regarding knee ROMs. Although available high-quality evidence is limited, EMG-BF might be a part of the rehabilitation after knee surgeries.Implications for rehabilitationThis paper reviews the effectiveness of the therapeutic EMG-BF as a potential option in rehabilitation after orthopedic knee surgeries.It is recommended EMG-BF can be used to control pain and to improve quadriceps strength and function.There is insufficient evidence to support EMG-BF to improve the range of motion.

The relationship between smartphone addiction and musculoskeletal pain prevalence among young population: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In the literature, there have been debates as to whether smartphone use has negative effects on physical and mental health. The present study investigated the extent to which smartphone addiction impacts on musculoskeletal pain prevalence among university students. METHODS: The questionnaire consisted of three sections: demographic information, the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), and the modified Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 249 participants were included in this cross-sectional study. The body parts that were reported with highest prevalence of musculoskeletal pain were the upper back (70.3%), neck (65.9%), and wrists/hands (68.7%). The SAS scores were correlated with duration of smartphone use on a typical day (P = 0.001), duration of owning a smartphone (P = 0.027), and musculoskeletal pain prevalence in the neck (P = 0.001), wrists/hands (P = 0.001), shoulders (P = 0.025), and upper back (P = 0.023). The SAS score was significantly associated with prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in the neck (odd ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.10; P = 0.002), wrists/hands (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97-1.09; P = 0.001), and upper back (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.98-1.11; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that the upper back, neck, and wrists/hands have a higher prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among smartphone users, particularly those with a smartphone addiction. Smartphone addiction scores were correlated with duration of smartphone use on a typical day, duration of owning smartphone, and musculoskeletal pain prevalence in the neck, wrists/hands, shoulders, and upper back.

A systematic review of musculoskeletal complaints, symptoms, and pathologies related to mobile phone usage.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, mobile phone usage rates have increased and there have been concerns that overuse of mobile phones may contribute to various musculoskeletal (MSK) problems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to systematically review available literature on the prevalence of MSK complaints, symptoms, and pathologies associated with mobile phone use. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHOD: In this systematic review, Medline (Pubmed), Wiley, WOS, and EMBASE electronic databases were searched for studies published in English between January 1, 2000 and March 25, 2019 using the following. KEY TERMS: 'mobile phone', 'smartphone', 'musculoskeletal pain', 'pain', 'musculoskeletal symptoms', and 'musculoskeletal pathology'. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 196 papers, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. Among the studies included in the systematic review, five were high quality, twelve were of acceptable quality, and one was of low quality. The review demonstrated that the prevalence of MSK complaints among mobile phone users ranged 8.2%-89.9%, and that neck and upper back complaints had the highest prevalence rates ranging from 55.8% to 89.9%. The most common MSK symptom associated with mobile phone use was pain. Myofascial pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, thoracic outlet syndrome, tendonitis, and De Quervain's syndrome were the most commonly associated MSK pathologies. CONCLUSION: The evidence concerning MSK complaints among mobile phone is somewhat limited because the data were obtained from cross-sectional and case-control study results. Consequently, there is need for higher quality and prospective studies to better understand the relationship between mobile phone use and MSK symptoms and pathologies.