Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs ; 6(4): 381-388, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31572758

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adult outpatient oncology pain clinics face many challenges due to the increased number of patients, the restriction of electronic appointment systems, overcrowding, waiting time, and patient dissatisfaction. This project aimed to improve clinic time efficiency, decrease clinic waiting time, and improve patient satisfaction. METHODS: Lean thinking concepts and their tools, for example, value-stream mapping and value added (VA)/non-VA (NVA) analysis were used. Electronic appointment system slots were stratified based on patient visit type. A total of 187 patients were included in a time-motion survey at three different occasions: preintervention (n = 67) and two consecutive quarter postintervention time points (n = 64, n = 56). Simultaneously, patient satisfaction was reported quarterly by a quality management office. RESULTS: The pain clinic workflow became more efficient; the mean clinic waiting time decreased from 72.5 min at preintervention to 19.5 and 21 min at the two postintervention quarters, respectively. Moreover, patient satisfaction improved from 75% at the preintervention to 100% and 96.7% at the two postintervention quarters. CONCLUSIONS: Redesigning the process of an electronic appointment system using lean thinking considerably decreases patients' waiting time, improves patient satisfaction, improves resource utilization, allows proper scheduling based on patient visit types, eliminates unnecessary waste processes, and reallocates health-care providers' time toward direct, individualized patient care.

2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 20(5): 1563-1570, 2019 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128063

RESUMEN

Background: Patients in oncology setting are struggling with the complexed disease, and long and intensive treatment options. This increase the need of patients for more coordination and effective hand-off between health providers including nurses. Aims: The main aim of this project is to improve the effectiveness of hand-off between nurses in the oncology setting using lean management principles. Methods: One group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was conducted at King Hussain Cancer Center during quarter two to quarter four in 2017. The project was conducted using the lean tools including root cause analysis, redesigning the hand-off process; using structured tools, and standardization of the hand-off process. Results: The finding of this project showed a significant decreasing in the hand-off duration and the incidence of events related to nursing practice deviation in post-intervention. Moreover, the results showed that the nurse satisfaction score was improved. However, there is a little difference in patient satisfaction results between two quarters for overall satisfaction and per each domain. Conclusion: The project approved that the use of structured tools, safety briefing, and standardized hand-off process play important role in improving the effectiveness of the hand-off process.


Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica/métodos , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente
3.
Surg Today ; 44(1): 100-6, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23377553

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) is relatively common. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors involved in the development of this complication. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study of breast cancer patients treated at our Center between 2004 and 2009. A total of 515 patients were included. Lymphedema was defined as a mid-arm or forearm circumference difference between both limbs of 2 cm or more. RESULTS: The incidence of LE in this population was 21.4 %. Patients with a BMI of 25 or higher had a significantly higher risk of LE (p = 0.002). The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.05) and the number of positive lymph nodes (LN) (p = 0.001) were both associated with LE. Patients who underwent axillary dissection (AD) had a significantly higher incidence of LE than patients who had a sentinel LN biopsy (25 vs. 4.5 %). Adjuvant radiotherapy was also a significant risk factor in patients who had a mastectomy (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There are multiple risk factors for LE. Most of those factors can be influenced by early tumor detection. Early tumors are smaller with no LVI or axillary LN metastasis. They do not usually require AD or axillary radiotherapy, which are the strongest factors associated with the development of LE.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Antebrazo , Humanos , Incidencia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Adulto Joven
4.
Saudi Med J ; 34(1): 62-6, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23299161

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of breast cancer related lymphedema in our region, and to heighten its awareness among health workers. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of patients treated with breast cancer at King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan, between January 2004 and December 2009. We excluded patients with bilateral breast cancer. A total of 515 patients were included. We asked the patients to complete questionnaires that included questions related to arm symptoms. Lymphedema was defined as 2 cm or more difference between the 2 upper limbs' girths. RESULTS: The incidence of lymphedema was 21.1%. The subjective evaluation by the patients overestimated the figure (35%). Most patients (75.3%) had limb symptoms, such as pain, numbness, and limitation of movement. In most patients with lymphedema, the symptoms were mild, but in 17 patients (15.6%) the effects were severe. CONCLUSION: Lymphedema continues to be a common health problem in our region. Most patients have mild lymphedema, but in some patients the effects on daily activities are severe. It is important for health workers to understand the significance of this problem and its associated morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Linfedema/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Jordania , Linfedema/patología , Linfedema/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...