Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Trustee ; 68(9): 27-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26665706

RESUMEN

Consistently high-performing health systems and hospitals have one key trait in common: humility.


Asunto(s)
Equipos de Administración Institucional , Liderazgo , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
2.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 21(11): 964-8, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22893696

RESUMEN

External groups requiring measures now include public and private payers, regulators, accreditors and others that certify performance levels for consumers, patients and payers. Although benefits have accrued from the growth in quality measurement, the recent explosion in the number of measures threatens to shift resources from improving quality to cover a plethora of quality-performance metrics that may have a limited impact on the things that patients and payers want and need (ie, better outcomes, better care, and lower per capita costs). Here we propose a policy that quality measurement should be: balanced to meet the need of end users to judge quality and cost performance and the need of providers to continuously improve the quality, outcomes and costs of their services; and parsimonious to measure quality, outcomes and costs with appropriate metrics that are selected based on end-user needs.


Asunto(s)
Cultura Organizacional , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Política Organizacional , Desarrollo de Programa , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Estados Unidos
3.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 20(6): 534-7, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21339313

RESUMEN

Healthcare costs are unsustainable. The authors propose a solution to control costs without rationing (deliberate withholding of effective care) or payment reductions to doctors and hospitals. Three physician-led strategies comprise this solution: reduce (1) overuse of health services, (2) preventable complications and (3) waste within healthcare processes. These challenges know no borders.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/economía , Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Errores de Medicación/economía , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
5.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 31(12): 684-9, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16430021

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2002, Sentara launched a systemwide initiative to significantly reduce events of harm to patients and employees. The initiative began at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. Since then, the safety principles piloted there have been instituted throughout Sentara's integrated health care system of hospitals, nursing homes, and physician practices. ACCELERATING THE PACE OF IMPROVEMENT: Implementation at each local site begins with a thorough assessment of its safety culture. Four core areas of focus include (1) establishing safety as a core value, (2) creating Behavior-Based Expectations (BBEs) for error prevention that are tailored for staff, leaders, and physicians, (3) developing a state-of-the-art root and common-cause analysis program, and (4) implementing an approach to focus and simplify work processes and procedure documentation. KEYS TO SUCCESS: Senior leadership demonstrated a commitment to making safety a core value by embedding safety into strategic priorities, incentives, rewards and recognition, and human resources policies and procedures; prioritization of operational goals to ensure the availability of time and resources to make the safety initiative the key focus; involvement of employees and medical staff each step of the way; establishment of site-based safety initiative teams of operational leaders with the responsibility for leading the safety initiative implementation and ensuring effective communication across the organization; and a willingness to learn and try successful techniques from high-reliability organizations outside health care.


Asunto(s)
Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Cultura Organizacional , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Educación Continua , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración
6.
Jt Comm J Qual Saf ; 30(10): 534-42, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15518357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To accelerate progress in improving patient safety, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital (SNGH) supplemented its improvement programs with an initiative to strengthen its organizational culture of safety. CREATING A CULTURE OF SAFETY: SNGH established and intternalized behaviors in the organization that would result in safer and more reliable and productive human erformance. Four areas of focus were identified: (1) creating Behavior-Based Expectations (BBEs) for error prevention for all positions, (2) establishing Red Rules to focus employees on rules with the highest level of consequence and risk if not followed exactly, (3) develping a technically based Root Cause and Common Cause Analysis process, and (4) implementing an appproach to focus and simplify policies and procedures. KEYS TO SUCCESS: The senior leadership made the safety initiative the number-one priority; operational goals were prioritized to ensure the availability of time and resources for the safety initiative. A team of five operational leaders led implementation and ensured efffective communication across the organization. Medical staff provided support to the safety initiative; for example, it developed and implemented its own BBEs list. Finally, employees were engaged in all phases of the initiative. SNGH's largest challenge remains to continue to accelerate improvement while simultaneously holding gains previously made.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Generales , Hospitales Generales/organización & administración , Cultura Organizacional , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Gestión de la Calidad Total , Eficiencia Organizacional , Hospitales Generales/normas , Humanos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , North Carolina , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Objetivos Organizacionales , Virginia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA