Prospective, randomized study comparing two different regimens of split-dose polyethylene glycol and their effect on endoscopic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Different split regimens of polyethylene glycol are routinely used and no guidelines are available to select an optimal protocol of ingestion. This study aims to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of two different regimens of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution: PEG (3 + 1) vs. PEG (2 + 2). METHODS: 240 patients above the age of 18 years were included in the study between June 1st and November 31st, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned either to Group A, consisting of 115 patients receiving a 3 L of PEG the night before the colonoscopy, and 1 L the same morning of the procedure. Or to group B, where 125 patients ingested 2 L the night before the procedure, and the remaining 2 L the same morning. The cleansing efficacy was evaluated by the attending endoscopist using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, through a score assigned for each segment of the colon (0-3). Side effects, tolerability, and willingness to retake the same preparation were listed by an independent investigator using a questionnaire administered before the procedure. RESULTS: A higher percentage of patients had gastric fullness with the 3 + 1 vs. 2 + 2 preparation (58.3% vs. 31.2%; p <.001). A higher Boston bowel preparation score was seen in patients who took the 2 + 2 vs. 3 + 1 preparation (7.87 vs. 7.23). Using the 2 + 2 preparation was significantly associated with higher Boston bowel preparation scores vs. the 3 + 1 preparation (OR = 1.37, p =.001, 95% CI 1.14, 1.64). After adjustment over other variables (age, gender, comorbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, presence of adenoma, and time between last dose and colonoscopy), results remained the same (aOR = 1.34, p =.003, 95% CI 1.10, 1.62). CONCLUSION: While both (2 + 2) and (3 + 1) regimens of polyethylene glycol are a good choice for a successful colonoscopy, we recommend the use of (2 + 2) regimen for its superior efficacy in bowel cleansing.

Impact of Wildfires on Cardiovascular Health.

Wildfire smoke (WFS) is a mixture of respirable particulate matter, environmental gases, and other hazardous pollutants that originate from the unplanned burning of arid vegetation during wildfires. The increasing size and frequency of recent wildfires has escalated public and occupational health concerns regarding WFS inhalation, by either individuals living nearby and downstream an active fire or wildland firefighters and other workers that face unavoidable exposure because of their profession. In this review, we first synthesize current evidence from environmental, controlled, and interventional human exposure studies, to highlight positive associations between WFS inhalation and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Motivated by these findings, we discuss preventative measures and suggest interventions to mitigate the cardiovascular impact of wildfires. We then review animal and cell exposure studies to call attention on the pathophysiological processes that support the deterioration of cardiovascular tissues and organs in response to WFS inhalation. Acknowledging the challenges of integrating evidence across independent sources, we contextualize laboratory-scale exposure approaches according to the biological processes that they model and offer suggestions for ensuring relevance to the human condition. Noting that wildfires are significant contributors to ambient air pollution, we compare the biological responses triggered by WFS to those of other harmful pollutants. We also review evidence for how WFS inhalation may trigger mechanisms that have been proposed as mediators of adverse cardiovascular effects upon exposure to air pollution. We finally conclude by highlighting research areas that demand further consideration. Overall, we aspire for this work to serve as a catalyst for regulatory initiatives to mitigate the adverse cardiovascular effects of WFS inhalation in the community and alleviate the occupational risk in wildland firefighters.

Molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer in a Middle Eastern population in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: The few studies of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Middle Eastern populations have included only small samples of patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the frequency and prognostic effect of RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PTEN, and EGFR somatic mutations as well as mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in Lebanese Middle Eastern patients. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center descriptive study. SETTING: Lebanese Middle Eastern patients in a tertiary medical cen.ter. METHODS: We included all patients diagnosed with CRC between January 2010 and December 2015, in whom RAS mutational status and the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 proteins were available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Genetic mutations detected by direct sequencing while MMR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. SAMPLE SIZE: 645 patients. RESULTS: RAS, BRAF, EGFR, PI3KCA, and PTEN mutation rates were 38.5%,12.9%, 0%, 11.1% and 0% respectively. The MMR deficiency rate was 20.6%. No factor was associated with RAS mutation whereas MMR-deficient tumors were less likely to be metastatic at diagnosis. Among patients with wild-type RAS females fared better than males (median overall survival [OS]=1734 vs 1079 days respectively, P=.015) even after adjustment for confounding factors by Cox regression analy.sis. This finding was not reproduced in the RAS-mutated group. The median OS of patients with MMR-deficient tumors was not reached, while the median OS was 2475 days in patients who had maintained expression of both MLH1 and MSH2. CONCLUSION: The RAS mutation rate was similar to Western and East Asian countries, but not for the BRAF mutation and MMR deficiency. We also found a prognostic effect for sex in the RAS wild-type group, a finding worthy of further exploration. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single center and small sample size. Expression of MSH6 and PMS2 not analyzed. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Systemic Versus Local Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasis: What to Choose and When?

BACKGROUND: Lung is the second most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Treatment is based mainly on systemic therapy which has largely evolved lately, but outcome remains relatively poor. The place of locoregional therapies as curative strategies is still debated. METHOD: A systematic literature review was performed by the authors for systemic therapy, surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The highest level of evidence for each strategy was presented. Major findings were addressed in a summarized and clinically relevant manner. RESULTS: All reported studies were descriptive non comparative reports except for one retrospective study comparing surgery to SBRT. The highest level of evidence for each therapeutic strategy are presented as follows: three large meta-analyses for surgery as well as seven and three prospective trials for RFA and SBRT, respectively. DISCUSSION: Surgery has the highest level of evidence for cure followed by RFA and SBRT. However, careful patient selection and complete resection of all metastasis are the main principles behind the efficacy of local therapies in the curative setting. Despite encouraging results, randomized trials are still needed.

TGFBR1*6A polymorphism in sporadic and familial colorectal Carcinoma: a case-control study and systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: The role of genetic factors in colorectal cancer pathogenesis is widely accepted. Polymorphisms are actually thought to play a role in the unexplained colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. There is conflicting data regarding the role of the transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 polymorphism 6A (TGFBR1*6A) in the increased incidence of CRC. PURPOSE: Our aim is to test the association between this polymorphism and sporadic/familial CRC in the Lebanese population paying attention to lead time bias in the control group. This is a case-control study conducted in two Lebanese hospital centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases were diagnosed with CRC during the period of 1 year prior to the study. Controls were healthy subjects aged >50 years with a history of normal colonoscopy during the period of 5 years prior to the beginning of the study. A total of 96 cases (57 sporadic/39 familial) and 97 controls were genotyped. The odds ratios for 6A carrier status was statistically significant for sporadic CRC, odds ratio (OR) = 2.314 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.030-5.195) but not for familial CRC. RESULTS: No association was found between 6A carrier status and mean age at diagnosis of CRC. This is the first article in the literature to evaluate the association between 6A polymorphism and total, sporadic, and familial CRC in a single study with reduction of bias in the control group. Results are in conjunction with other studies and meta-analysis.

Pancreatic panniculitis: a rare complication of pancreatitis secondary to ERCP.

Panniculitis is an uncommon and rare complication of systemic fat necrosis in patients with pancreatic diseases. The skin manifestations are independent of the severity of the pancreatic pathology and can occur at any time. The lesions can precede, be concomitant with or rarely follow the pancreatic illness. We report a case of acute pancreatitis post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stone, with subcutaneous panniculitis. We noted a complete resolution within two weeks after the treatment of the pancreatic pathology.