Phase I/II randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of processed amniotic fluid drops after PRK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of processed amniotic fluid (pAF) used postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: University of Utah, Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled prospective study. METHODS: 61 participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops, which were instilled 4 times per day for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measure was time to full re-epithelialization in days. Secondary measures included visual acuity at 30 days and postoperative pain scores during the first week. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization, with a median of 5 days for both groups. There were no difference in pain indicator scores during the first week and no difference in corneal staining scores at day 30 between the 2 groups. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication for PRK demonstrated that pAF did not improve the rate of epithelial healing after PRK. pAF may be safely studied in other ocular conditions to determine its effect on epithelial healing.

Text messaging during simulated driving.

OBJECTIVE: This research aims to identify the impact of text messaging on simulated driving performance. BACKGROUND: In the past decade, a number of on-road, epidemiological, and simulator-based studies reported the negative impact of talking on a cell phone on driving behavior. However, the impact of text messaging on simulated driving performance is still not fully understood. METHOD: Forty participants engaged in both a single task (driving) and a dual task (driving and text messaging) in a high-fidelity driving simulator. RESULTS: Analysis of driving performance revealed that participants in the dual-task condition responded more slowly to the onset of braking lights and showed impairments in forward and lateral control compared with a driving-only condition. Moreover, text-messaging drivers were involved in more crashes than drivers not engaged in text messaging. CONCLUSION: Text messaging while driving has a negative impact on simulated driving performance. This negative impact appears to exceed the impact of conversing on a cell phone while driving. APPLICATION: The results increase our understanding of driver distraction and have potential implications for public safety and device development.