Infections with Herpes simplex and Varicella zoster virus.

Human herpes viruses belong to the DNA viruses and are among the most common viral pathogens. Currently, eight human herpes viruses have been characterized. Primary infection is typically followed by virus latency. Viral reactivations are more often symptomatic than primary infections and lead more often to medical consultation. In daily practice, infections with herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) are the most common. If HSV primary infections become clinically manifest, they are often accompanied by systemic symptoms whereas manifest HSV reactivations are usually harmless, self-limiting and present as grouped vesicles on an erythematous base (herpetiform). Primary VZV infection leads to the clinical picture of varicella (chickenpox). VZV reactivation manifests clinically as shingles and can be accompanied by severe acute neuralgiform pain. In immunosuppression, complicated (necrotizing, ulcerative, hemorrhagic, generalized) manifestations may occur. The diagnosis is usually made clinically. Therapeutic options include topical agents and systemic antivirals. Adequate therapeutic management includes the recognition and treatment of complications such as the possible involvement of other organ systems and pain. Infection during pregnancy may result in transmission to the unborn child.

Infektionen mit Herpes-simplex- und Varizella-zoster-Virus.

Humane Herpesviren gehören zu den DNA-Viren und zählen zu den häufigsten Erregern viraler Infektionen beim Menschen. Nach der Primärinfektion mit einem dieser Viren kommt es typischerweise zur Latenz mit dem Potenzial späterer Reaktivierungen, die häufiger symptomatisch sind und zum Arztbesuch führen als die Primärinfektion. In der täglichen Praxis sind Infektionen mit dem Herpes-simplex-Virus (HSV) und dem Varizella-zoster-Virus (VZV) am häufigsten vertreten. Sofern HSV-Primärinfektionen klinisch manifest werden, gehen sie häufig mit Allgemeinsymptomen einher. HSV-Reaktivierungen verlaufen meist harmlos und selbstlimitierend und präsentieren sich als gruppierte Bläschen auf erythematösen Grund (herpetiform). Die VZV-Primärinfektion führt zum klinischen Bild der Varizellen (Windpocken). Bei Immunsuppression kann es zu komplizierten (nekrotisierenden, ulzerierenden, hämorrhagischen, generalisierten) Verläufen kommen. Die VZV-Reaktivierung manifestiert sich klinisch als Herpes zoster (Gürtelrose) und kann mit starken akuten Schmerzen einhergehen. Die Diagnosestellung erfolgt meist klinisch. Therapeutisch stehen Topika und systemische Virostatika zur Verfügung. Das adäquate therapeutische Management umfasst das Erkennen und Behandeln von Komplikationen wie der möglichen Beteiligung weiterer Organsysteme und Schmerzen. Eine Infektion in der Schwangerschaft kann zur Übertragung auf das ungeborene Kind führen.

ASC Speck Formation after Inflammasome Activation in Primary Human Keratinocytes.

Chronic UV irradiation results in many changes in the skin, including hyperplasia, changes in dermal structures, and alteration of pigmentation. Exposure to UVB leads to cutaneous damage, which results in inflammation characterized by increased NF-κB activation and the induction of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin- (IL-) 1, or IL-8. IL-1 secretion is the result of inflammasome activation which is besides apoptosis, a result of acute UVB treatment. Inflammasomes are cytosolic protein complexes whose formation results in the activation of proinflammatory caspase-1. Key substrates of caspase-1 are IL-1ß and IL-18, and the cytosolic protein gasdermin D (GSDMD), which is involved in inflammatory cell death. Here, we demonstrate that UVB-induced inflammasome activation leads to the formation of ASC specks. Our findings show that UVB provokes ASC speck formation in human primary keratinocytes prior to cell death, and that specks are, opposed to the perinuclear cytosolic localization in myeloid cells, formed in the nucleus. Additionally, we showed by RNAi that NLRP1 and not NLRP3 is the major inflammasome responsible for UVB sensing in primary human keratinocytes. Formation of ASC specks indicates inflammasome assembly and activation as their formation in hPKs depends on the presence of NLRP1 and partially on NLRP3. Nuclear ASC specks are not specific for NLRP1/NLRP3 inflammasome activation, as the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome by cytosolic DNA results in ASC specks too. These nuclear ASC specks putatively link cell death to inflammasome activation, possibly by binding of IFI16 (gamma-interferon-inducible protein) to ASC. ASC can interact upon UVB sensing via IFI16 with p53, linking cell death to ASC speck formation.

Diffuse PRAME Expression Is Highly Specific for Thin Melanomas in the Distinction from Severely Dysplastic Nevi but Does Not Distinguish Metastasizing from Non-Metastasizing Thin Melanomas.

BACKGROUND: PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is increasingly used as diagnostic adjunct in the evaluation of melanocytic tumors. The expression and prognostic significance of PRAME in melanomas ≤1.0 mm and its diagnostic utility in the distinction from severely dysplastic compound nevi (SDN) have not been studied. METHODS: We investigated and compared the immunohistochemical PRAME expression in 70 matched thin metastasizing and non-metastasizing melanomas and 45 nevi from patients with long-term follow-up (35 SDN and 10 unequivocally benign compound nevi). RESULTS: Diffuse PRAME staining in >75% of lesional epidermal and dermal melanocytes identified 58.6% of thin melanomas but did not distinguish metastasizing from non-metastasizing melanomas (p = 0.81). A superficial atypical melanocytic proliferation of uncertain significance, in which the final diagnostic interpretation favored a SDN was the only nevus with diffuse PRAME expression (1/45). Melanomas and SDN with PRAME immunoreactivity exhibited different staining patterns. Most melanomas (67.6%) showed uniform PRAME expression in the in situ and invasive component, whereas most SDN (81.0%) showed a decreasing gradient with depth. CONCLUSION: Diffuse intraepidermal and dermal PRAME staining is highly specific for melanomas in the distinction from SDN. PRAME expression is not a prognostic biomarker in melanomas ≤1.0 mm.

Stellenwert diagnostischer Verfahren und Risiko von Zweittumoren bei primär kutanen Lymphomen.

HINTERGRUND: Primär kutane Lymphome (PCL) unterscheiden sich oft stark im klinischen Verhalten und in der Prognose von systemischen Lymphomen des gleichen histopathologischen Typs. Ziel der Studie war es, die Verteilung der PCL-Subtypen, die Zeitspanne von der Krankheitsmanifestation bis zur Diagnosestellung, den Stellenwert diagnostischer Verfahren, das Auftreten von Zweittumoren und die verschiedenen Behandlungsmodalitäten im Rahmen des Krankheitsverlaufs zu untersuchen. PATIENTEN UND METHODIK: Retrospektive Analyse von 152 Patienten mit PCL, die von 2010-2012 an der Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen behandelt wurden. ERGEBNISSE: 105 Patienten mit primär kutanem T-Zell-Lymphom (CTCL) (69,1 %) und 47 Patienten mit primär kutanem B-Zell-Lymphom (CBCL) (30,9 %) wurden eingeschlossen. Die Zeitspanne von der Krankheitsmanifestation bis zur Diagnose betrug durchschnittlich vier Jahre. Mycosis fungoides (MF) (47,4 %) wurde am häufigsten diagnostiziert. Die First-Line-Therapien umfassten hier entweder eine alleinige Phototherapie (PUVA, n = 48; UVB 311 nm, n = 7) oder Kombinationstherapien (PUVA mit systemischen Retinoiden, n = 18). Häufigste Second-Line-Therapie war Interferon (INF)-α plus PUVA (n = 15). Der Behandlungsverlauf war insgesamt günstig (45,2 % Remission, 28,6 % stabile Erkrankung, 22,6 % Progress). Maligne Komorbiditäten wurden im Vergleich zu einer gesunden Vergleichsgruppe häufiger beobachtet. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Bis zur Diagnosestellung der PCL dauert es oft mehrere Jahre. Der Wert der Staging-Verfahren ist gering. Die Behandlungsmodalitäten in früheren MF-Stadien basieren hauptsächlich auf der Phototherapie.

Importance of diagnostics and risk of secondary malignancies in primary cutaneous lymphomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCL) often strongly differ in clinical behavior and prognosis from systemic lymphomas of the same histopathologic type. The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of PCL subtypes, the average time from disease manifestation to diagnosis, the importance of diagnostic procedures, the occurrence of secondary malignancies and the different treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 152 patients with PCL examined at the Department of Dermatology of the University Hospital Tübingen from 2010-2012. RESULTS: 105 patients with CTCL (69.1 %) and 47 patients with CBCL (30.9 %) were included. The average time from disease manifestation to diagnosis was four years. The most common diagnosed lymphoma was mycosis fungoides (MF) (47.4 %). First-line therapies here include phototherapy only (psoralen-UV-A [PUVA], n = 48; UVB 311 nm, n = 7) or combination therapies primarily phototherapy with systemic retinoids (n = 18). Most frequent second-line therapy was interferon (INF)-α plus PUVA (n = 15). The outcome was favorable (45.2 % remission, 28.6 % stable disease, 22.6 % progressive disease). Malignant comorbidities were observed more frequently compared to a healthy control group. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of lymphoma often takes several years. The value of staging procedures is still low and the treatment modalities for MF in earlier stages are mainly based on phototherapy.

Prevalence and Impact of Type I Sensitization to Alpha-Gal in Patients Consulting an Allergy Unit.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-gal syndrome is a complex allergy with high clinical relevance regarding mammalian-derived food and drugs and is characterized by the presence of IgE antibodies directed at the carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose. As not all alpha-gal sIgE-positive individuals pre-sent clinical symptoms upon consumption of mammalian meat, the diagnostic value of alpha-gal sIgE has yet to be clarified. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of alpha-gal-sIgE positivity among allergy patients, examine the impact of tick bites as associated risk factors and determine the diagnostic value of alpha-gal-sIgE positivity. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study evaluating patients in the Allergy Unit was performed. Alpha-gal-sIgE levels were assessed by ImmunoCAP assay. Exposure to tick bites was assessed by a questionnaire. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of alpha-gal sIgE for the diagnosis of alpha-gal syndrome. RESULTS: In the study population (n = 1369), the overall prevalence of alpha-gal-sIgE-positive (≥0.10 kUA/L) individuals was 19.9%, and the highest prevalence (30.2%) was found in patients with insect venom allergies. A reported tick bite within the 12 months prior to blood sampling significantly increased the risk of alpha-gal-sIgE positivity (OR 2.084). The ROC curve analysis indicated alpha-gal sIgE ≥0.54 kUA/L as the optimal cutoff point for assessing the diagnostic value of alpha-gal syndrome in allergy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In allergy care settings, alpha-gal-sIgE positivity is a common finding. Alpha-gal sIgE is a sensitive marker in the diagnosis of alpha-gal syndrome but has limited predictive value for the characteristics or severity of this allergy.