Variable impact of graft CD3+ cell content on graft versus host disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Is the role of donor CD3+ cells overestimated?

Graft cellular composition is considered as a significant determinant of transplant outcome. Donor CD3+ cells were shown to have a significant association with the development of graft vs host disease (GvHD). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of graft CD3+ cell content on transplant outcome, particularly in terms of GvHD and relapse. We retrospectively analysed the records of 515 allo-HCT recipients [median age: 37(15-71) years; male/female: 323/192]. The optimal threshold of infused CD3+ cell count for acute GvHD development was estimated to be 197.5 × 106/kg (AUC: 0.572; 95 % CI: 0.513-0.631; p = 0.018) and 198.5 × 106/kg (AUC: 0.6; 95 % CI: 0.520-0.679; p = 0.019) for the general population and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) subgroup, respectively. Acute GvHD was more frequent in low-CD3+ group in the whole study population, particularly in RIC transplants. The incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation was higher in low-CD3+ group and neutrophil engraftment occured earlier in the same group of patients. Overall survival and non-relapse mortality were comparable between high and low-CD3+ groups. Age, ECOG performance status, hypogammaglobulinemia, chronic GvHD and post-transplant relapse were found to predict prognosis in multivariate analysis. By focusing mainly on donor T cells, the potential role of host immune cells in the early post-transplant milieu may have been underestimated. Drawing a more detailed profile of graft and host immune cells in the joint microenvironment may elucidate our way to a better understanding of GvHD pathogenesis. By this way a comprehensive pre-transplant risk assessment could be improved to generate more personalized approaches.

Sunitinib or Pazopanib: Is There Any Difference Between Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Pre-Nivolumab Setting in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

Introduction Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma disease have been improved in recent years. However, there is still no optimal treatment sequence or combination for metastatic disease. We aimed to investigate whether patients differed in terms of disease outcomes regarding pre-nivolumab tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Material and methods The analysis of patients was performed after all cohorts were sub-grouped into two groups according to pre-nivolumab TKIs as following the sunitinib arm and the pazopanib arm. Result A total of 75 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was eight months for all cohorts. The objective response rate was statistically significantly higher in the pazopanib arm as compared to the sunitinib arm (56% vs 30%, p=0.02). Progression-free survival was significantly higher in pazopanib than sunitinib (10.3 months vs 5.3 months, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that pazopanib treatment was associated with better progression-free survival (HR: 0.44, 95 CI; 0.22-0.91, p=0.02). While the median overall survival for patients who had received sunitinib was 11.0 months, it has not been reached the median in the pazopanib arm (11.0 months vs NR, p=0.051). Discussion We demonstrated significantly better progression-free survival and a higher objective response rate with nivolumab treatment in patients who had received pazopanib as compared with patients who received sunitinib in the pre-nivolumab period.