RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory diseases, and the relationship between pulmonary ventilation function and the prognosis of patients with suspected asthma is not well understood. This study aims to explore the impact of pulmonary ventilation functions on the prognosis of patients with suspected asthma. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with suspected asthma who were diagnosed and treated at the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between August 2015 and January 2020. The primary outcome of interest was improvement in asthma symptoms, as measured by bronchial provocation test (BPT) results within 1 year after diagnosis. The impact of pulmonary ventilation functions on prognosis was explored by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patients with normal (OR = 0.123, P = 0.004) or generally normal (OR = 0.075, P = 0.039) pulmonary ventilation function were more likely to achieve improvement in asthma symptoms compared with patients with mild obstruction. There were no significant differences between the improvement and non-improvement groups in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that suspected asthma patients with normal or generally normal pulmonary ventilation function are more likely to achieve improvement in asthma symptoms within one year compared to patients with mild obstruction.
RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the modified hypertonic saline bronchial provocation test (HS-BPT) for children with asthma by using the high-power Aerosol Provocation System (APS).Methods: A total of 330 children suspected of having asthma and receiving HS-BPT-APS were included in this prospective survey conducted in Guangzhou, China from February 2017 to September 2018. The positive rate of HS-BPT-APS and the volume and types of adverse reactions were observed. There was also a retrospective cohort of 123 children with suspected asthma who underwent a methacholine BPT from 2015 to 2017. Using the method of nearest neighbor matching, a comparison was made of the positive rate and adverse reaction between the methacholine BPT group and HS-BPT-APS group.Results: The total positive rate of HS-BPT-APS was 43.9%. Common adverse reactions included cough, wheezing and chest tightness. There were no serious adverse reactions. Results of nearest neighbor matching showed a difference in the positive rate between the methacholine BPT group and HS-BPT-APS group (8.1% vs 18.2%, p = 0.026), but there was no statistically significant difference between the age groups in patients who received the methacholine BPT or HS-BPT-APS. There was a similar adverse reaction rate in the two groups (p = 0.609).Conclusions: HS-BPT-APS is simple, safe, and time-saving, with few adverse reactions. The positive rate of HS-BPT-APS was higher than that of methacholine BPT in children with asthma. HS-BPT-APS may be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of children with asthma, and further study is required.
