Calcineurin inhibitors or cyclophosphamide in the treatment of membranous nephropathy superimposed with FSGS lesions: a retrospective study from China.

BACKGROUND: Cyclophosphamide (CTX) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) based regimens are recommended as immunosuppressive therapies for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) lesions, which are common in membranous nephropathy (MN), are poor predictors of outcome. This study compared the differences of prognosis between two regimens in patients with IMN combined with FSGS lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 108 patients with biopsy-proven IMN, accompanied with FSGS lesions, nephrotic syndrome and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were treated with CTX or CNIs. We used propensity score matching (PSM) for balancing the confounding variables. RESULTS: During follow-up, 10 patients (10/55 [18.2%]; nine males) in the CNIs group showed a 50% decline in eGFR; eight had a not otherwise specified variant. Patients initially treated with CNIs had a significantly higher risk of progression to the primary outcome and a lower probability of complete or total remission. The relapse rate was higher in patients who initially received CNIs- than in those who received CTX-based treatment. Before PSM, age and 24-h urine protein level differed significantly between the groups. The PSM model included data from 72 patients. Worse outcomes were also noted among patients who initially received CNIs than those who received CTX-based treatments after matching. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MN combined with FSGS lesions have a higher risk of renal functional decline and a higher rate of relapse after CNIs than after CTX therapy.

Primary cutaneous Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, in a nonimmunocompromised young man: A case report.

Primary cutaneous EBV (Epstein-Barr virus)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), is an extremely rare disease. The clinical and pathological features of DLBCL, NOS have not been clearly illustrated. We report a case of primary cutaneous EBV-positive DLBCL, NOS in a 35-year-old Chinese male with multiple ulcerated and nodular lesions on his trunk and arms for 6 months. No other organs, except the skin, were involved. The lesions were localized in the dermis with focal necrosis. The tumor cells were immunoblastic- or centroblastic-like cells and diffusely distributed. There were numerous inflammatory cells in the background. The tumor cells were positive for CD20, PAX-5, MUM1, LMP1, CD30, and Epstein-Barr virus encodedsmall RNA, but negative for EBNA2. Polymerase chain reaction showed a monoclonal IG gene rearrangement. The patient received 6 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin®, prednisone) chemotherapy and went into complete remission. There was no evidence of relapse after 35 months of follow-up.

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, excluding atypical lesion, is a predictor of renal outcome in patients with membranous nephropathy: a retrospective analysis of 716 cases.

BACKGROUND: Focal segmental lesions (FSLs) are not uncommon in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). The reported percentage of IMN patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) lesions varies widely between studies. The objective of this study was to differentiate atypical FSL (aFSL) from typical FSGS in IMN and to analyse the clinicopathological predictors of primary outcome of IMN patients. METHODS: A total of 716 patients with biopsy-proven IMN between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017 were enrolled in the study. An atypical focal segmental lesion was defined as pure synechia, segmental hyperplasia of podocytes or thickening of the GBM accompanied by proliferation of the mesangial matrix, and absence of typical FSGS. The patients were divided into three groups: patients without FSL (FSL-), patients with typical FSGS (FSGS+), and patients with aFSL (aFSL+).The primary outcome was a 50% decline in the initial estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) incidence. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death and ESRD. RESULTS: FSGS was present in 174 patients, while aFSL was noted in 161 patients. Systolic blood pressure was higher in both aFSL+ group and FSGS+ groups compared with the FSL- group. IMN patients without FSL and with aFSL had lower serum creatinine levels than IMN patients with FSGS. Both the FSGS+ and aFSL+ groups had higher levels of proteinuria and lower albumin levels than the FSL- group. Renal tissue lesions, including tubulointerstitial fibrosis, glomerular obsolescence, and vascular sclerosis were significantly more severe in the FSGS+ group. Cox multivariate analysis showed that older age ≥ 60 years, eGFR< 60 ml/(min·1.73m2), tubulointerstitial fibrosis area ≥ 15% and FSGS at biopsy were independent risk factors for the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in outcome was found between the FSL- and aFSL+ groups, although the patients with aFSL had lower levels of serum albumin and eGFR, higher level of urinary protein, more severe renal lesions with proliferation of the mesangial area,tubulointerstitial fibrosis and vascular sclerosis. FSGS, excluding atypical lesions, was an independent predictor of the primary outcome.