Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 395(10236): 1569-1578, 2020 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No specific antiviral drug has been proven effective for treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Remdesivir (GS-5734), a nucleoside analogue prodrug, has inhibitory effects on pathogenic animal and human coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro, and inhibits Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2 replication in animal models. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial at ten hospitals in Hubei, China. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an interval from symptom onset to enrolment of 12 days or less, oxygen saturation of 94% or less on room air or a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen of 300 mm Hg or less, and radiologically confirmed pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg on days 2-10 in single daily infusions) or the same volume of placebo infusions for 10 days. Patients were permitted concomitant use of lopinavir-ritonavir, interferons, and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement up to day 28, defined as the time (in days) from randomisation to the point of a decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status (from 1=discharged to 6=death) or discharged alive from hospital, whichever came first. Primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and safety analysis was done in all patients who started their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04257656. FINDINGS: Between Feb 6, 2020, and March 12, 2020, 237 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (158 to remdesivir and 79 to placebo); one patient in the placebo group who withdrew after randomisation was not included in the ITT population. Remdesivir use was not associated with a difference in time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·87-1·75]). Although not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less (hazard ratio 1·52 [0·95-2·43]). Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early. INTERPRETATION: In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits. However, the numerical reduction in time to clinical improvement in those treated earlier requires confirmation in larger studies. FUNDING: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Emergency Project of COVID-19, National Key Research and Development Program of China, the Beijing Science and Technology Project.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Alanina/efectos adversos , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultados Negativos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
2.
Inflammation ; 42(2): 637-649, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392071

RESUMEN

Previous studies have been indicated that tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6)-induced inflammation leads to acute kidney injury (AKI). How microRNA (miR) contributes to this process is poorly defined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether miR-590-3p regulated lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response by inhibiting TRAF6. LPS-induced septic mice were treated with adenovirus expressing miR-590-3p (ad-miR-590-3p) via tail-vein injection. AKI was evaluated by examining serum cystatin C (CysC), serum ß2-microglobulin (ß2-MG), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). The mRNA and protein levels were assayed by RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. The proliferation of podocytes was monitored using the MTT assay. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. Survival outcomes in ad-miR-590-3p-transfected septic mice were markedly improved compared with mice with LPS-induced sepsis. Ad-miR-590-3p transfection significantly attenuated LPS-induced AKI, which was reflected by an improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as determined by measuring CysC, ß2-MG, and BUN. Moreover, we observed that miR-590-3p was a novel regulator of TRAF6, binding to its 3'-untranslated regions (3'-UTRs). In vitro, a miR-590-3p gain-of-function mutation blocked LPS-induced podocyte growth inhibition and apoptosis, as well as overactivation of the inflammatory response. miR-590-3p has the ability to suppress LPS-induced AKI and podocyte apoptosis by targeting TRAF6. This might provide a novel strategy for the treatment of LPS-induced renal injuries.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , MicroARNs/genética , Sepsis/patología , Factor 6 Asociado a Receptor de TNF/antagonistas & inhibidores , Lesión Renal Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Apoptosis , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Lipopolisacáridos , Ratones , Podocitos/patología , Sepsis/complicaciones , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...