Potential Concussive Event Narratives of Post-9/11 Combat Veterans: Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Study.

INTRODUCTION: Deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects a significant proportion of those who served in Post-9/11 combat operations. The prevalence of head injuries, including those that lead to mTBI, is often reported quantitatively. However, service member (SM) and Veteran firsthand accounts of their potential concussive events (PCEs) and mTBIs can serve as a rich resource for better understanding the nuances and context of these exposures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-9/11 SMs and Veterans with a history of combat deployment were recruited through the Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium's observational study of deployment-related mTBI. During a comprehensive assessment, participants completed the Virginia Commonwealth University retrospective Concussion Diagnostic Interview, a specialized validated interview measure which obtains detailed narratives of deployment-incurred blast and non-blast-related PCEs. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify and code recurring themes within the narratives. RESULTS: Among the sample of 106 SMs and Veterans, deployment-related mTBI was highly prevalent (67.0%). Over half (50.9%) of the participants identified a blast as the cause of their worst PCE, frequently with accompanying themes of self-reported acute neurological symptoms, intense physical blast forces, and tertiary head impact. Exposure to blast at close range, such as driving directly over an improvised explosive device, occurred in 24.7% of all blast-related narratives and in 59.3% of narratives where blast was identified as causing the worst PCE. Themes of potentially preventable head impacts experienced during noncombat circumstances were also frequent, accounting for 35% of all non-blast-related head injuries in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of deployment-related close-range blast exposure, non-blast impact PCEs, and mTBIs among this Post-9/11 combatant sample was substantial, and in many cases potentially preventable. The use of detailed semi-structured interviews may help health care providers and policymakers to better understand the context and circumstances of deployment-related PCEs and mTBIs.

Measurement of depressive symptoms among cardiac patients: should sex differences be considered?

Confounding of depressive and cardiac symptoms may hold implications for assessment. This study investigated psychometric properties and sex differences in two depression scales among cardiac patients. Cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals were recruited and completed a mailed survey including the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Gotland Scale of Male Depression 1 year later. The scales were significantly correlated and both were associated with social desirability. Females scored higher than males on the fatigue factor only (p < .001). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II were more favorable in this population. Practitioners must not overlook reports of fatigue in female cardiac patients.

Primary care provider perceptions of intake transition records and shared care with outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs.

BACKGROUND: While it is recommended that records are kept between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists during patient transitions from hospital to community care, this communication is not currently standardized. We aimed to assess the transmission of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program intake transition records to PCPs and to explore PCPs' needs in communication with CR programs and for intake transition record content. METHOD: 144 PCPs of consenting enrollees from 8 regional and urban Ontario CR programs participated in this cross-sectional study. Intake transition records were tracked from the CR program to the PCP's office. Sixty-six PCPs participated in structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Sixty-eight (47.6%) PCPs received a CR intake transition record. Fifty-eight (87.9%) PCPs desired intake transition records, with most wanting it transmitted via fax (n = 52, 78.8%). On a 5-point Likert scale, PCPs strongly agreed that the CR transition record met their needs for providing patient care (4.32 ± 0.61), with 48 (76.2%) reporting that it improved their management of patients' cardiac risk. PCPs rated the following elements as most important to include in an intake transition record: clinical status (4.67 ± 0.64), exercise test results (4.61 ± 0.52), and the proposed patient care plan (4.59 ± 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of intake transition records are reaching PCPs, revealing a large gap in continuity of patient care. PCP responses should be used to develop an evidence-based intake transition record, and procedures should be implemented to ensure high-quality transitional care.