RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angioembolization is a useful therapeutic tool for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) however is only available at centres with specialist interventional radiology departments. Delay in angioembolization of greater than 120-150 minutes is associated with higher rates of non-therapeutic angioembolization. METHODS: This retrospective review analysed the impact of interhospital transfer on timing and success of angioembolization in adults with LGIB. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients who underwent CTMA at a peripheral hospital for LGIB, only 20.7% had positive CTMA (n = 25). Of the 24 patients who were transferred for the purpose of angioembolization, only five ultimately had successful embolisation (20.1%). Patients who had unsuccessful angioembolization had a significantly longer mean time from arrival at the tertiary hospital to angioembolization compared to patients who had successful angioembolization (mean 375 versus 175 min, P = 0.001). There was no association of patient haemodynamics, use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, and transfusion requirement with success of angioembolization. CONCLUSION: Interhospital transfer is associated with delay in angioembolization. Delay after arrival at the receiving hospital is associated with unsuccessful angioembolization.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transfusión Sanguínea , HospitalesAsunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Divertículo del Colon/complicaciones , Divertículo del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Absceso Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diverticula of the appendix (DA) have a reported incidence of up to 2.1%. They are primarily detected incidentally, through imaging and intraoperative or histologic diagnosis. This study's objective was to examine the prevalence of DA, and its relationship with inflammation and neoplasia, as well as review the literature with respect to clinical outcomes and ability to identify DA preoperatively. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective search of all patients undergoing an appendicectomy for right lower quadrant pain at a single institution between 2004 and 2017 was conducted. Histopathology reports for evidence of DA, location of the DA, presence of inflammation, and any relationship between DA and neoplasms (adenoma, carcinoma, carcinoid, lymphoma, and mucinous neoplasm) within the appendix were reviewed. Clinical notes, operative records, and preoperative imaging were also reviewed. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred eleven patient were included in the study, with a mean age of 34 years, with acute appendicitis found in 82.5%. 31.6% of patients with DA had associated inflammation of the DA. DA was present in 57 patients (2.1%), with 55 patients in the total cohort having neoplasia (2.0%). Patients with DAs were ten times more likely to have appendicular neoplasm than patients without a DA (17.5 vs 1.8%; p < 0.0001, OR 11.8 95%, CI 5.6-24.8). CONCLUSION: This is the first Australian study demonstrating DAs are a significant marker of appendiceal neoplasm. Appendicectomy in all incidentally discovered diverticulum should be considered. Due to a paucity of data, research is required into this area to assess for the need for endoscopy following diagnosis.