Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
1.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 75(3): 625-633, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34569172

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patient-clinician goal concordance is associated with improved outcomes in certain chronic diseases but not explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined goal concordance, correlates of concordance, and the association of concordance with health outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients with RA seen at least 1 time in the prior 12 months at 1 of 2 rheumatology clinics participated. Patients and their clinicians independently ranked top 3 goals for RA treatment from 8 options before a routine visit. Patients completed postvisit surveys on health, demographic information, health literacy, and adherence. Goal concordance was defined as the patient's number 1 goal being among the clinician's top 3 goals for that patient. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of concordance. RESULTS: Patients were 58% female and 16% Spanish-speaking, and 29% had limited health literacy. Among 204 patient-clinician dyads, 20% were goal-discordant. "Have less pain" was selected by both patient and clinician in 81% of dyads, followed by "have fewer problems doing daily activities" by 63%. Otherwise, clinicians prioritized avoiding side effects, whereas patients ranked improved sleep, fatigue, and mood. Longer disease duration was associated with discordance (median 13.3 years, interquartile range [IQR] 5.2-20 among discordant vs. 7 years, IQR 4-14; P = 0.039); higher depressive symptoms were associated with concordance (8.1% vs. 24%; P = 0.04). Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence (adjusted odds ratio 2.76 [95% confidence interval 1.01, 7.56]). CONCLUSION: One in 5 patient-clinician dyads had discordant treatment goals. Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence. Studies to improve goal elicitation and communication of patients with RA's priorities are needed.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Objetivos , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Comunicación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(10): e2236738, 2022 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251293

RESUMEN

Importance: Respirable silica exposure has been strongly and consistently linked to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among foundry workers, persons in the construction trades, stone crushers and drillers, and coal miners. However, risk of RA in hard rock mining has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective: To analyze occupational risk of RA in hard rock miners in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study estimated the association between mining industry work and reported RA in a random-digit telephone survey of men 50 years or older living in selected counties with elevated levels of pneumoconiosis mortality (N = 1988). The survey was conducted between January 12 and May 4, 2021. Exposures: Underground hard rock and other mining and related mineral-processing occupations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Report of a clinician diagnosis of RA further defined by treatment with corticosteroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Risk was estimated using logistic regression. Results: The analytic sample of 1988 men (survey response rate, 11.1% of all contacts) had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (10.1) years. Underground hard rock mining was reported by 118 (5.9%); underground mining of other types, predominantly coal mining (no concomitant hard rock), 62 (3.1%); and surface mining or ore processing (no underground), 262 (13.2%). Adjusting for age and smoking and accounting for nonmining silica exposure, mining employment was associated with increased odds of corticosteroid-treated RA (n = 89) (odds ratio, 4.12 [95%, 2.49-6.81]). The odds were similar for RA treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (n = 80) (odds ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.93-5.66]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional survey study, workers in hard rock and other underground mining and surface mining occupations experienced 3- to 4-fold increased odds of RA. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider patients with relevant work exposures as at higher risk for developing RA.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Minas de Carbón , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Carbón Mineral , Colorado , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , New Mexico , Dióxido de Silicio/efectos adversos , Utah
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(5): 308-314, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34987082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We previously showed increased coal mining-associated risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Using additional survey data, we sought to delineate this risk further. METHODS: We used data from two cross-sectional, random-digit-dial, population-based surveys (males;≥50 years) in selected counties in the Appalachian region of the inland, mid-Atlantic USA with elevated pneumoconiosis mortality. Surveys ascertained age, smoking, coal mining and non-coal silica exposure jobs. In a subset, we surveyed ergonomic exposures, scored by intensity. We queried diagnosis of RA, corticosteroid use, and, in a subset, use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Multivariable logistic regression modelled RA risk (defined by glucocorticoid or DMARDs use) associated with coal mining employment, other silica exposure, smoking status, and age and ergonomic exposures. RESULTS: We analysed data for 2981 survey respondents (mean age 66.6 years; 15% current, 44% ex-smokers). The prevalence of glucocorticoid-treated and DMARD-treated RA was 11% and 4%, respectively. Glucocorticoid-treated RA was associated with coal mining (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.5 to 4.9) and non-coal mining silica exposure (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4 to 4.4). For DMARD-treated RA, the odds associated with coal mining and other silica remained elevated: OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.18, 4.5) and OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.51, 5.0), respectively. In the same model, the highest intensity ergonomic exposure also was associated with increased odds of RA (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.96 to 9.6). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a strong association between coal mining and other silica-exposing dusty trades and RA. Clinicians and insurers should consider occupational histories in the aetiology of RA.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Minas de Carbón , Anciano , Región de los Apalaches/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Polvo , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Masculino , Dióxido de Silicio/efectos adversos
4.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(4): 525-533, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069933

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with poor adult health and immune dysregulation. The impact of ACEs on patients with autoimmune disease is unknown. The present study was undertaken to compare the prevalence of ACEs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to a population-based survey estimate and to investigate relationships between ACEs and SLE outcomes. METHODS: Data derived from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUES), a sample of adult patients with SLE. Participants completed a 10-item ACE questionnaire covering 3 domains (abuse, neglect, household challenges). We estimated ACE prevalence in 269 CLUES participants compared to geographically matched respondents from the 2015 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which was standardized to CLUES participant characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity). We examined associations of patient-reported and physician-assessed health status measures with overall ACE levels and domains using multivariable linear regression, controlling for sociodemographics, nephritis, and juvenile-onset SLE. RESULTS: Although specific domains varied, overall ACE levels were similar for CLUES and BRFSS respondents. Among SLE patients, 63.2% had ≥1 ACE, and 19.3% had ≥4. ACEs were more prevalent in those who were older, women, Latino or African American, and without college degrees, but not in those with lupus nephritis. In adjusted models, higher ACE levels and ACE domains were associated with worse patient-reported SLE activity, depression, and health status but were not significantly associated with physician-assessed SLE activity, damage, or severity. CONCLUSION: Given the association between ACE levels and important patient-reported outcomes in SLE, our study reinforces the need for prevention of ACEs in childhood and for clinical interventions to promote resilience among adults who have experienced ACEs.


Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 1(6): 366-372, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31777816

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Reduced physical function and frailty are common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, relationships between frailty and changes in physical function and disease activity over time in RA are unknown. We tested whether frailty is a risk factor for worsening patient-reported physical function and disease activity in RA. METHODS: Adults from a longitudinal RA cohort (N = 124) participated. By using an established frailty definition, individuals with three or more of the following deficits were considered frail: 1) body mass index less than or equal to 18.5, 2) low grip strength, 3) severe fatigue, 4) slow 4-m walking speed, and 5) low physical activity. Individuals with one to two or zero deficits were considered "pre-frail" or "robust," respectively. Physical function and RA disease activity were assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI), respectively, at baseline and follow-up 2 years later. Regression analyses modeled associations of frailty status with change in HAQ and RADAI scores between baseline and follow-up with and without controlling for covariates. Associations of individual frailty components with change in HAQ and RADAI scores were also examined. RESULTS: Among adults with RA, baseline frailty status predicted significant increases, or worsening, in HAQ (ß: 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.8; P < 0.01) but not RADAI scores (ß: 0.5; 95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 1.5; P > 0.05) between baseline and follow-up in fully adjusted models. Fatigue was an important contributor to this effect. CONCLUSION: Frailty may be an important risk factor for reduced physical function over time in RA. Future studies should address whether interventions to reduce frailty improve physical function in RA.

6.
J Rheumatol ; 45(12): 1636-1642, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30219761

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) is often suboptimal. We examined associations among medication beliefs, self-efficacy, and adherence to medications in RA. METHODS: Data were from a longitudinal observational cohort of persons with RA. Subjects completed telephone interviews on self-reported adherence, self-efficacy, demographics, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), which assesses beliefs in necessity and beliefs about taking medication. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression identified correlates of poor adherence to synthetic DMARD and prednisone as well as to biologic therapy, including medication concerns and necessity. RESULTS: There were 362 patients who reported taking a synthetic DMARD and/or prednisone. Of these, 14% and 21% reported poor adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, and biologics, respectively. There were 64% who reported concern about taking medicines, 81% about longterm effects, and 47% about becoming too dependent on medicines. In multivariate analyses, the BMQ necessity score was independently associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91), while self-efficacy was associated with greater odds of poor adherence to oral medications (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.59). Beliefs in medicines and self-efficacy were not associated with adherence to biologics. CONCLUSION: In a diverse cohort of patients with RA, stronger beliefs in the necessity of medication were associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, while higher self-efficacy was associated with poor adherence. Providers can play important roles in eliciting patient beliefs about medications to improve adherence and ultimately health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/psicología , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 70(11): 1614-1620, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29438606

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Alignment of patient and clinician goals, which is central to effective patient-centered care, has been linked to improved patient experience and outcomes but has not been explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to analyze goal conceptualization among RA patients and clinicians. METHODS: Seven focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview were conducted with RA patients and clinicians who were recruited from 4 rheumatology clinics. An interview guide was developed to explore goal concordance related to RA treatment. Researchers utilized a concurrent deductive-inductive data analysis approach. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age 55 years, 74% female, 32% non-white, and 26% Spanish-speaking) and 18 clinicians (44% trainees, 44% female, 28% non-white) participated. Across clinician and patient focus groups, the 2 identified domains were patient knowledge of RA and psychosocial dynamics (stress) in RA treatment. Within the knowledge domain, 3 themes emerged: RA knowledge for informed choice, RA knowledge to ensure adherence and medication safety, and clinician assumption of patient inability to interpret information. Within the second domain of RA and stress, 2 themes emerged: patient illness experience informs treatment context in ways that are not shared by clinicians, and the impact of patient-clinician communication and decision-making on goal concordance. CONCLUSION: Knowledge is a shared goal, but RA patients and clinicians hold divergent attitudes towards this goal. While knowledge is integral to self-management and effective shared decision-making, mismatches in attitudes may lead to suboptimal communication. Tools to support patient goal-directed RA care may promote high quality patient-centered care and result in reduced disparities.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/psicología , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa
8.
J Rheumatol ; 45(3): 393-396, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29335347

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess lung cancer risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), relative to demographics, drug exposures, smoking, and disease activity. METHODS: We analyzed data from 14 SLE cohorts. We calculated adjusted HR estimates for lung cancer in SLE, relative to demographics, smoking, time-dependent medication exposures, and cumulative disease activity [mean adjusted SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores]. This project was approved by the ethics boards of all participating institutions, including the Institutional Review Board of the McGill University Health Centre. The ethics approval number for the Cancer Risk study is GEN-06-031. RESULTS: Within these 14 SLE cohorts, 49 incident lung cancers occurred. Among lung cancer cases, 59.0% were in the highest SLEDAI quartile at baseline versus 40.8% of lung cancer-free SLE controls. The vast majority (84.2%) of SLE lung cancer cases were ever-smokers at baseline, versus 40.1% of those without lung cancer. In adjusted models, the principal factors associated with lung cancer were ever smoking (at cohort entry) and current age. Estimated adjusted effects of all drugs were relatively imprecise, but did not point toward any drug exposures as strong lung cancer risk factors. CONCLUSION: We saw no clear evidence for drugs as a trigger for lung cancer risk in SLE, although drug risk estimates were relatively imprecise. Smoking may be the most significant modifiable lung cancer risk factor in SLE.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 70(1): 104-113, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371529

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess different measures of socioeconomic status (SES) as predictors of incident depression among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Data were derived from the 2010-2015 waves of the Lupus Outcomes Study, where individuals with confirmed SLE were interviewed annually by telephone. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, using a validated lupus-specific cutoff (≥23) for major depressive disorder. Women interviewed in ≥2 consecutive waves, with scores <23 in the first wave (T1), were included. The level of financial strain was classified as high, moderate, or none based on responses to 3 questions. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the impact of poverty status, income, education, and financial strain at T1 on the risk of incident depression the next year (T2), with adjustment for sociodemographic and disease status measures. Individuals could contribute more than one 2-year dyad to the analysis. RESULTS: In total, 682 women contributed 2,097 observations, with 19% having high financial strain, 47% moderate strain, and 34% no strain. There were 166 women who had 184 episodes of incident depression (rate = 8.8/100 person-years). In bivariate analysis, poverty, lower income and education, disease activity, and high financial strain were associated with depression onset; race/ethnicity was not. Poverty, income, and education were not significant in multivariate analyses, but disease activity and high financial strain were (odds ratio 1.85 [95% confidence interval 1.06-3.23]). CONCLUSION: High financial strain was a significant predictor of new-onset depression in women with SLE, controlling for disease factors and other SES measures. Determining specific, modifiable sources of financial strain may help prevent the development of depression.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto , Anciano , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Renta , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/psicología , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Factores de Riesgo , San Francisco/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
10.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 70(6): 869-876, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We estimated the economic impact of arthritis using 2013 US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. METHODS: We calculated arthritis-attributable and all-cause medical expenditures for adults age ≥18 years and arthritis-attributable earnings losses among those ages 18-64 years who had ever worked. We calculated arthritis-attributable costs using multistage regression-based methods, and conducted sensitivity analyses to estimate costs for 2 other arthritis definitions in MEPS. RESULTS: In 2013, estimated total national arthritis-attributable medical expenditures were $139.8 billion (range $135.9-$157.5 billion). Across expenditure categories, ambulatory care expenditures accounted for nearly half of arthritis-attributable expenditures. All-cause expenditures among adults with arthritis represented 50% of the $1.2 trillion national medical expenditures among all US adults in MEPS. Estimated total national arthritis-attributable earning losses were $163.7 billion (range $163.7-$170.0 billion). The percentage with arthritis who worked in the past year was 7.2 percentage points lower than those without arthritis (76.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 75.0-78.6 and 84.0% [95% CI 82.5-85.5], respectively, adjusted for sociodemographics and chronic conditions). Total arthritis-attributable medical expenditures and earnings losses were $303.5 billion (range $303.5-$326.9 billion). CONCLUSION: Total national arthritis-attributable medical care expenditures and earnings losses among adults with arthritis were $303.5 billion in 2013. High arthritis-attributable medical expenditures might be reduced by greater efforts to reduce pain and improve function. The high earnings losses were largely attributable to the substantially lower prevalence of working among those with arthritis compared to those without, signaling the need for interventions that keep people with arthritis in the workforce.


Asunto(s)
Artritis/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Renta , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
11.
Clin Rheumatol ; 36(5): 1031-1039, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28116570

RESUMEN

Reduced physical function and health-related quality of life are common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and further studies are needed that examine novel determinates of reduced physical function in RA. This study examines whether frailty, a state of increased vulnerability to stressors, is associated with differences in self-reported physical function among adults with RA. Adults from a longitudinal RA cohort (n = 124) participated in the study. Using an established definition of frailty, individuals with three or more of the following physical deficits were classified as frail: (1) body mass index ≤18.5, (2) low grip strength (adjusted for sex and body mass index (BMI), measured by handheld dynamometer), (3) severe fatigue (measured by the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue), (4) slow 4-m walking speed (adjusted for sex and height), and (5) low physical activity (measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire). Individuals with one or two deficits were classified as "pre-frail" and those with no deficits as "robust." Self-reported physical function was assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Valued Life Activities Difficulty scale. Regression analyses modeled associations of frailty category with HAQ and Valued Life Activities (VLA) Difficulty scores with and without controlling for age, sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein, use of oral steroids, and pain. Among adults with RA, being frail compared to being robust was associated with a 0.44 worse VLA score (p < 0.01) when the effects of covariates are held constant. Being frail, compared to being robust, is associated with clinically meaningful differences in self-reported physical function among adults with RA.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Autoinforme , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , California/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fragilidad/etiología , Fragilidad/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 69(2): 234-242, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27111538

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating tramadol or oxycodone into knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. METHODS: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes of knee OA patients with a mean age of 60 years with persistent pain despite conservative treatment. We evaluated 3 strategies: opioid-sparing (OS), tramadol (T), and tramadol followed by oxycodone (T+O). We obtained estimates of pain reduction and toxicity from published literature and annual costs for tramadol ($600) and oxycodone ($2,300) from Red Book Online. Based on published data, in the base case, we assumed a 10% reduction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectiveness in opioid-based strategies. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and were discounted at 3% per year. RESULTS: In the base case, T and T+O strategies delayed TKA by 7 and 9 years, respectively, and led to reduction in TKA utilization by 4% and 10%, respectively. Both opioid-based strategies increased cost and decreased QALYs compared to the OS strategy. Tramadol's ICER was highly sensitive to its effect on TKA outcomes. Reduction in TKA effectiveness by 5% (compared to base case 10%) resulted in an ICER for the T strategy of $110,600 per QALY; with no reduction in TKA effectiveness, the ICER was $26,900 per QALY. When TKA was not considered a treatment option, the ICER for T was $39,600 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Opioids do not appear to be cost-effective in OA patients without comorbidities, principally because of their negative impact on pain relief after TKA. The influence of opioids on TKA outcomes should be a research priority.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/economía , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxicodona/economía , Tramadol/economía
13.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 24(1): 106-112, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27274017

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with limited health literacy (LHL) and limited English proficiency (LEP) experience suboptimal communication and health outcomes. Electronic health record implementation in safety net clinics may affect communication with LHL and LEP patients.We investigated the associations between safety net clinician computer use and patient-provider communication for patients with LEP and LHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We video-recorded encounters at 5 academically affiliated US public hospital clinics between English- and Spanish-speaking patients with chronic conditions and their primary and specialty care clinicians. We analyzed changes in communication behaviors (coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System) with each additional point on a clinician computer use score, controlling for clinician type and visit length and stratified by English proficiency and health literacy status. RESULTS: Greater clinician computer use was associated with more biomedical statements (+12.4, P = .03) and less positive affect (-0.6, P < .01) from LEP/LHL patients. In visits with patients with adequate English proficiency/health literacy, greater clinician computer use was associated with less positive patient affect (-0.9, P < .01), fewer clinician psychosocial statements (-3.5, P < .05), greater clinician verbal dominance (+0.09, P < .01), and lower ratings on quality of care and communication. CONCLUSION: Higher clinician computer use was associated with more biomedical focus with LEP/LHL patients, and clinician verbal dominance and lower ratings with patients with adequate English proficiency and health literacy. DISCUSSION: Implementation research should explore interventions to enhance relationship-centered communication for diverse patient populations in the computer era.


Asunto(s)
Barreras de Comunicación , Comunicación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Alfabetización en Salud , Lenguaje , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Estados Unidos
14.
Musculoskeletal Care ; 15(4): 295-303, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27976535

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During the clinical encounter, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient goals for care often go unexplored. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify needs, goals and expectations of RA patients in order better to guide systematic elicitation of patient goals in clinical encounters. METHODS: An academic librarian searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library using a specialized algorithm developed to identify articles about patient goals for RA care. Investigators screened search results according to prespecified inclusion criteria and then reviewed included articles and synthesized the evidence qualitatively, utilizing an inductive approach. RESULTS: A total of 909 titles were retrieved in the literature search, of which 871 were excluded after a title/abstract screen. Of the remaining 38, 22 papers were included in the final review. Investigators identified four major themes in the literature: (a) the bodily experience of RA; (b) achieving normalcy and maintaining wellness; (c) social connectedness and support; and (d) interpersonal and healthcare system interactions. CONCLUSION: Patients' goals when receiving care for RA are multidimensional and span several facets of everyday life. Goals for RA care should be collaboratively developed between patients and providers, with particular attention to the patient's life context and priorities.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/psicología , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Objetivos , Humanos
15.
Cytokine ; 90: 109-112, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27863333

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Muscle strength is an important determinant of physical function in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Serum biomarkers of inflammation, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP), are associated with differences in muscle strength among individuals without rheumatologic disease. We examined whether serum levels of IL-6 and CRP are associated with upper and lower extremity muscle strength among adult women with SLE. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six women with SLE participated in this cross-sectional study. High-sensitivity CRP was analyzed by nephelometry. IL-6 serum levels were analyzed by high sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Upper and lower extremity muscle strength were assessed by grip strength and peak torque of knee extension and flexion, respectively. Regression analyses modeled associations of CRP and IL-6 with upper and lower extremity muscle strength controlling for age, SLE duration, physical activity, prednisone use, BMI, plaquenil use, and pain. RESULTS: Higher serum levels of IL-6 and CRP were associated with significantly weaker upper and lower extremity muscle strength even when controlling for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum IL-6 and CRP are associated with clinically significant differences in upper and lower extremity muscle strength and may be useful in identifying those at risk for weakness and decreased physical function.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Interleucina-6/sangre , Fuerza Muscular , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación
16.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 68(12): 1743-1750, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27014966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been increasing over the past several decades in the US, concurrent with an aging population and the growing obesity epidemic. We quantify the impact of these factors on the number of persons with symptomatic knee OA in the early decades of the 21st century. METHODS: We calculated the prevalence of clinically diagnosed symptomatic knee OA from the National Health Interview Survey 2007-2008 and derived the proportion with advanced disease (defined as Kellgren/Lawrence grade 3 or 4) using the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated simulation model of knee OA. Incorporating contemporary obesity rates and population estimates, we calculated the number of persons living with symptomatic knee OA. RESULTS: We estimate that approximately 14 million persons had symptomatic knee OA, with advanced OA comprising more than half of those cases. This includes more than 3 million persons of racial/ethnic minorities (African American, Hispanic, and other). Adults younger than 45 years of age represented nearly 2 million cases of symptomatic knee OA and individuals between 45 and 65 years of age comprised 6 million more cases. CONCLUSION: More than half of all persons with symptomatic knee OA are younger than 65 years of age. As many of these younger persons will live for 3 decades or more, there is substantially more time for greater disability to occur, and policymakers should anticipate health care utilization for knee OA to increase in the upcoming decades. These data emphasize the need for the deployment of innovative prevention and treatment strategies for knee OA, especially among younger persons.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/etnología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/etiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0144918, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26731012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Therapeutic practices have evolved over the past 15 years, but effects on infectious complications of SLE are unknown. We evaluated trends in hospitalizations for severe and opportunistic infections in a population-based SLE study. METHODS: Data derive from the 2000 to 2011 United States National Inpatient Sample, including individuals who met a validated administrative definition of SLE. Primary outcomes were diagnoses of bacteremia, pneumonia, opportunistic fungal infection, herpes zoster, cytomegalovirus, or pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). We used Poisson regression to determine whether infection rates were changing in SLE hospitalizations and used predictive marginals to generate annual adjusted rates of specific infections. RESULTS: We identified 361,337 SLE hospitalizations from 2000 to 2011 meeting study inclusion criteria. Compared to non-SLE hospitalizations, SLE patients were younger (51 vs. 62 years), predominantly female (89% vs. 54%), and more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities. SLE diagnosis was significantly associated with all measured severe and opportunistic infections. From 2000 to 2011, adjusted SLE hospitalization rates for herpes zoster increased more than non-SLE rates: 54 to 79 per 10,000 SLE hospitalizations compared with 24 to 29 per 10,000 non-SLE hospitalizations. Conversely, SLE hospitalizations for PCP disproportionately decreased: 5.1 to 2.5 per 10,000 SLE hospitalizations compared with 0.9 to 1.3 per 10,000 non-SLE hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with SLE, herpes zoster hospitalizations are rising while PCP hospitalizations are declining. These trends likely reflect evolving SLE treatment strategies. Further research is needed to identify patients at greatest risk for infectious complications.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Micosis/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 44(6): 666-71, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701500

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To better understand why immunosuppressed individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) fail to receive influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. METHODS: These cross-sectional data were derived from the 2009 cycle of the Lupus Outcomes Study (LOS), an annual longitudinal telephone survey of individuals with confirmed SLE. Respondents were included in the analysis if they had taken immunosuppressive medications in the past year. We assessed any prior receipt of pneumococcal vaccine and influenza vaccine in the past year, and then elicited reasons for not receiving vaccination. We used bivariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression to assess frequency and predictors of reported reasons for not obtaining influenza or pneumococcal vaccines. RESULTS: Among 508 respondents who received immunosuppressants, 485 reported whether they had received vaccines. Among the 175 respondents who did not receive an influenza vaccine, the most common reason was lack of doctor recommendation (55%), followed by efficacy or safety concerns (21%), and lack of time (19%). Reasons for not receiving pneumococcal vaccine (N = 159) were similar: lack of recommendation (87%), lack of time (7%), and efficacy or safety concerns (4%). Younger, less-educated, non-white patients with shorter disease duration, as well as those immunosuppressed with steroids alone, were at the greatest risk for not receiving indicated vaccine recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reason why individuals with SLE did not receive pneumococcal and influenza vaccines was that physicians failed to recommend them. Data suggest that increasing vaccination rates in SLE will require improved process quality at the provider level, as well as addressing patient concerns and barriers.


Asunto(s)
Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria/normas , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Gripe Humana/etiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infecciones Neumocócicas/etiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 67(8): 1158-63, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25623810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Health information technology (HIT) holds promise in increasing access to rheumatologists by improving the quality and efficiency of referrals, but few studies have examined its use for this purpose. We evaluated the use and impact of a novel electronic referral (eReferral) system in rheumatology in a safety-net health system. METHODS: We examined eReferrals over 4 years. Our primary outcome was use of preconsultation exchange, defined as back-and-forth communication between referring and specialty care providers, facilitating triage of referrals, requests for more information, or resolution of questions without a visit. We calculated the proportion of eReferrals that underwent preconsultation exchange, time to reviewer response, and number of visits scheduled. To increase generalizability, we selected a random sample of eReferrals to undergo additional blinded, adjudicated review to assess agreement on appropriateness for preconsultation exchange. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2012, 2,383 eReferrals were reviewed and 2,105 were eligible for analysis. One-fourth of eReferrals were resolved without a clinic visit. The proportion of eReferrals undergoing preconsultation exchange increased over time (55% in 2008 versus 74% in 2011), and the volume of referrals also steadily increased over time. Reviewer response time averaged between 1 and 4 days. In the random sample of eReferrals that underwent adjudicated review, agreement between reviewers was high (κ = 0.72). CONCLUSION: HIT-enabled preconsultation exchange was used for a majority of eReferrals and facilitated communication between referring clinicians and rheumatologists. This redesigned system of care allowed for triage of a high number of referrals, with many referrals determined to be appropriate for preconsultation exchange.


Asunto(s)
Informática Médica/métodos , Derivación y Consulta , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA