Development of novel anti-filarial agents using carbamo(dithioperoxo)thioate derivatives.

A series of novel carbamo(dithioperoxo)thioate derivatives have been prepared in excellent yield using a significantly fast, one-pot three component reaction and experimented for their potential as anti-filarial agents against model filarial nematode Setaria cervi. Among 23 compounds (4a-w) evaluated for the anti-filarial activities, five compounds (4a, 4b, 4c, 4d and 4h) have shown promising anti-proliferative effects on the juvenile stage microfilariae (mf) as well as in adults in a time and dose dependent manner. Compound 4a was found most active against oocytes, mf and adult nematods as well as non-cytotoxic to the normal cells. It has been established that the anti-filarial activity of the compounds were observed due to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis. Several biochemical and microscopic experiments have been carried out to establish the fact that both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis contribute to the compound 4a mediated death phenomenon of the filarial nematodes.

Potent γ-secretase inhibitors/modulators interact with amyloid-ß fibrils but do not inhibit fibrillation: a high-resolution NMR study.

Recently, γ-secretase modulators (GSM) have been shown to interact directly with the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and simultaneously inhibit the activity of the Presenilin domain of γ-secretase. A clear understanding of the molecular recognition pathways by which GSM can target both γ-secretase and Aß precursor protein can lead to the development of more effective inhibitors. To examine whether this direct interaction with APP affects the downstream Aß fibril formation, we chose to investigate three different molecules in this study: Sulindac sulfide, Semagacestat and E2012 from the class of generation I GSMs, γ-secretase inhibitors (GSI), and generation II GSM molecules, respectively. Firstly, through NMR based ligand titration, we identified that Sulindac sulfide and Semagacestat interact strongly with Aß40 monomers, whereas E2012 does not. Secondly, using saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR experiments, we found that all three molecules bind equally well with Aß40 fibrils. To determine if these interactions with the monomer/fibril lead to a viable inhibition of the fibrillation process, we designed an NMR based time-dependent assay and accurately distinguished the inhibitors from the non-inhibitors within a short period of 12h. Based on this pre-seeded fibril assay, we conclude that none of these molecules inhibit the ongoing fibrillation, rather ligands such as Semagacestat and E2012 accelerated the rate of aggregation.