PROPSEA, safety evaluation of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients with breast cancer: A prospective real-world TOG study.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the toxicities and management of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients (≥65 years) with metastatic breast cancer patients were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among older patients receiving palbociclib and ribociclib, Geriatric 8 (G8) and Groningen Frailty Index were used to evaluate frailty status. Dose modifications, drug withdrawal and other serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded and analyzed according to baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients from 28 centers in Turkey were included (palbociclib = 76, ribociclib = 84). Forty-three patients were ≥ 75 years of age. The most common cause of first dose modification was neutropenia for both drugs (97% palbociclib, 69% ribociclib). Liver function tests elevation (10%) and renal function impairment (6%) were also causes for ribociclib dose modification. Drug withdrawal rate was 3.9% for palbociclib and 6% for ribociclib. SAEs were seen in 11.8% of those taking palbociclib and 15.5% of those on riboclib. An ECOG performance status of ≥2 and being older than 75 years were associated with dose reductions. Severe neutropenia was more common in patients with non-bone-only metastatic disease, those receiving treatment third-line therapy or higher, coexistance of non-neutropenic hematological side effects (for ribociclib). Neutropenia was less common among patients with obesity. DISCUSSION: Our results show that it can be reasonable to start palbociclib and ribociclib at reduced dose in patients aged ≥75 years and/or with an ECOG performance status ≥2.

Next generation sequencing analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies novel variations in breast cancer.

Mutations in two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified to be the most important predisposing factors for the development of breast cancer. Thus, BRCA1/2 testing is a well-established method of choice for the assessment of developing breast cancer. Accordingly, here we aimed to report novel BRCA1/2 variations and distribution of previously known mutations and their association with the clinical course of breast cancer disease. A total of 287 breast cancer patients were enrolled from January 2017 through December 2019. Of these patients, 50 of them were identified to be positive for BRCA1/2. Next Generation Sequencing analysis was performed for the screening of exonic and intronic variations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Notably, novel variations of 4448 G > A (Ser1843Asn) in BRCA1, and 982dupA (Thr328AspfsTer) and 7588C > T (Gln2530Ter) in BRCA2 gene were identified. The most common variations in BRCA1 gene were 5152 + 66G > A, 442-34C > T and 5266dupC. In BRCA2 gene, the most common variations were 9097dupA, 67 + 1G > A and 1114A > C. Novel variations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were identified in breast cancer and might be useful predisposing factors in breast cancer diagnosis.