Differences in spine growth potential for Sanders maturation stages 7A and 7B have implications for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the differences in spine and total body height growth and curve progression between Sanders maturation stage (SMS) 7A and 7B in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: This retrospective case-control study involving patients with AIS at SMS 7 evaluated the differential gains in the spine (T1-S1) and total body height and curve progression between SMS 7A and 7B. A validated formula was used to calculate the corrected height, accounting for height loss due to scoliosis. A multivariable non-linear and logistic regression model was applied to assess the distinct growth and curve progression patterns between the SMS 7 subtypes, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 231 AIS patients (83% girls, mean age 13.9 ± 1.2 years) were included, with follow-up averaging 3.0 years. Patients at SMS 7A exhibited larger gains in spine height (9.9 mm vs. 6.3 mm) and total body height (19.8 mm vs. 13.4 mm) compared with SMS 7B. These findings remained consistent even after adjustments for curve magnitude. Non-linear regression models showed continued spine and total body height increases plateauing after 2 years, significantly greater in SMS 7A. More SMS 7A patients had curve progression over 10°, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.31. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that patients staged SMS 7A exhibited more spine and total body growth and a greater incidence of substantial curve progression than those at 7B. These findings imply that delaying brace discontinuation until reaching 7B could be beneficial, particularly for those with larger curves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Case-control study).

Intraoperative CT Scan Verification of Pedicle Screw Placement in AIS to Prevent Malpositioned Screws: Safety Benefit and Cost.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective database review. OBJECTIVES: Determine if use of intraoperative 3D imaging of pedicle screw position provides clinical and cost benefit. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Injury or reoperation from malpositioned pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery occurs but is increasingly considered to be a never-event. To avoid complications, intraoperative 3D imaging of screw position may be obtained. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive AIS database at a high-volume pediatric spine center was examined three years before and after implementation of an intraoperative low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scan protocol. All screws were placed via freehand technique and corrected if found to be outside optimal trajectory on the postplacement CT scan. Demographic and outcome data were compared between cohorts, along with number, location, and reason for screw change. Cost analysis was based on the average cost of revision surgery for screw malposition versus intraoperative CT use. RESULTS: There were 153 patients in the pre-CT and 153 in the post-CT cohorts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two reoperations were needed for revision of improper screw placement in the pre-CT group and none in the post-CT group. Number of patients needed to harm was 76 (absolute risk increase = 1.31% [-0.49%, 3.11%]). Of those who had intraoperative CT scans, 80 (52.3%) needed on average 1.75 screw trajectories/lengths changed. Forty-three percent were medial breaches; of these, 39% were in the concavity. There were no differences between patients who did and did not need screw repositioning with regard to body mass index (BMI), age, curve size, surgeon/trainee side, screw density, or preoperative and one-year postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22) scores. The average cost of reoperation for malposition was $4,900, whereas the cost of a single intraoperative CT was $232. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CT is an effective tool to prevent reoperation in AIS surgery for incorrect screw placement. Despite high volume, experience, and specialty training, incorrect trajectories occur and systems should be in place for preventable error. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Are We Prescribing Our Patients Too Much Pain Medication? Best Predictors of Narcotic Usage After Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Physicians play a role in the current prescription drug-abuse epidemic. Surgeons often prescribe more postoperative narcotic pain medication than patients routinely need. Although narcotics are effective for severe, acute, postoperative pain, few evidence-based guidelines exist regarding the routinely required amount and duration of use post-hospital discharge. METHODS: Patients in a prospective cohort undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis were asked preoperatively to rate their pain level, the level of pain expected each week postoperatively, and their pain tolerance. Post-discharge pain scores and narcotic use were reported at weekly intervals for 4 weeks postoperatively. Demographic data, preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, operative details, perioperative data, and self-reported pain levels were analyzed with respect to their association with total medication use and refills received. Disposal plans were also assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 85% completed the surveys. The mean patient age was 14.9 years; 69% of the patients were female. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of total medication usage. The mean number of pills used in the middle (average-use) group was 49 pills. In postoperative week 4, narcotic usage was minimal (a mean of 2.9 pills by the highest-use group). Also by this time point, pain scores had, on average, returned to preoperative levels. Older age, male sex, a higher body mass index, and a higher preoperative pain score were associated with increased narcotic use. Sixty-seven percent of the patients planned to dispose of their unused medication, although only 59% of those patients planned on doing so in a manner recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative narcotic dosing may be improved by considering patient age, weight, sex, and preoperative pain score. The precise estimation of individual narcotic needs is complex. Patient and family education on the importance and proper method of narcotic disposal is an essential component of minimizing the availability of unused postoperative medication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.