Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) ; 15(1): 78-82, 2020 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33329794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tension pneumothorax on the contralateral lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) can be life-threatening if not rapidly diagnosed and managed. However, diagnosis is often delayed because the classic signs of tension pneumothorax are similar to clinical manifestations commonly observed during OLV. CASE: We report a case of contralateral tension pneumothorax in a patient undergoing right upper lobectomy during OLV. The patient suffered from sudden cardiac arrest and was assisted by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Contralateral pneumothorax during OLV is rare but can occur at any time. Therefore, anesthesiologists should consider this critical complication.

2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(28): e20935, 2020 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32664091

RESUMEN

During ganglion impar block, the needle may approach the presacral space and the sacrum may be penetrated during caudal anesthesia. Because the rectum is in front of the sacrococcyx and is thus at risk for puncture, it is important to determine the distance between the sacrococcyx and rectum, as well as the thickness of the sacrococcyx.Computed tomography was used to measure the distance between the rectum and sacrococcyx, as well as the thickness of the sacrococcyx. The distances between the coccyx and rectum, sacrococcygeal joint and rectum, sacral level 5 ('sacrum 5') and rectum, and 'sacrum 4 to 5 junction' and rectum were measured. The results were compared based on the presence or absence of stools in the rectum. The thickness of the sacrococcyx was measured at the sacrum 4 to 5 junction and sacrococcygeal joint.In total, 1264 patients were included in this study. All distances were less than 1 mm in both males and females, with the exception of the distance between the coccyx and rectum in males. In both males and females, there was no significant difference in distance between the sacrococcyx and rectum according to the presence or absence of feces in the rectum, but there was a difference in the distance between sacrum 5 and the rectum in males (P = .048). Several male and female patients showed thicknesses of less than 5 mm at the sacrococcygeal joint.Some patients have a distance of less than 1 mm between the sacrum and rectum. Practitioners should exercise caution when applying a needle to the presacral space. If the sacrum is accidentally penetrated during caudal block, rectum puncture cannot be ruled out. Excretion of feces does not influence the distance between the sacrococcyx and rectum in females.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Caudal/instrumentación , Cóccix/anatomía & histología , Agujas , Recto/anatomía & histología , Recto/lesiones , Sacro/anatomía & histología , Heridas Penetrantes/etiología , Heridas Penetrantes/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Pesos y Medidas Corporales , Cóccix/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
J Int Med Res ; 48(4): 300060519893165, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The bispectral index (BIS) has been used to monitor sedation during spinal anesthesia. We evaluated the correlation between BIS and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine, propofol, or midazolam. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study included 46 patients scheduled for knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia with sedation. The patients were randomized to receive sedation with dexmedetomidine (n = 15), propofol (n = 15), or midazolam (n = 16). Correlation between BIS and OAA/S was assessed during sedation in the three groups. RESULTS: A linear correlation was observed between BIS and OAA/S, and there was no significant difference in BIS score between the groups during mild to moderate sedation status (OAA/S 3-5). During deep sedation (OAA/S 1-2), the BIS score in the midazolam group was significantly higher than that in the propofol and dexmedetomidine groups (74.4 ± 11.9 vs 67.7 ± 9.5 vs 62.6 ± 12.2). CONCLUSIONS: BIS values differed at the same level of sedation between different sedative agents. Objective sedation scores should therefore be used in combination with BIS values for the assessment of sedation levels during spinal anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Propofol , Sedación Consciente , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Midazolam
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA