Melanoma brain metastases: is it time to eliminate radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in treatment of intracranial metastasis from melanoma, calling into question the role of intracranial radiotherapy (RT). Herein, we assessed the utilization patterns of intracranial RT in patients with melanoma brain metastasis and compared outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy alone versus immunotherapy in addition to intracranial RT. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immunotherapy and intracranial RT or immunotherapy alone. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with increased likelihood of receiving immunotherapy alone. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify co-variates predictive of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS: We identified 528 and 142 patients that were treated with combination therapy and immunotherapy alone, respectively. Patients with lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive immunotherapy alone. Extracranial disease and treatment at a non-academic center were associated with worse OS. Median OS for all patients was 11.0 months. Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in addition to immunotherapy was superior to immunotherapy alone, median OS of 19.0 versus 11.5 months (p = 0.006). Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy performed worse than immunotherapy alone, median OS of 7.7 versus 11.5 months (p = 0.0255). CONCLUSIONS: For melanoma patients requiring WBRT, immunotherapy alone may be reasonable in asymptomatic patients. For those eligible for SRS, combination therapy may provide better outcomes. Results of ongoing prospective studies will help provide guidance regarding the use of radioimmunotherapy in this population.

Targeting minor histocompatibility antigens in graft versus tumor or graft versus leukemia responses.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) represents the only curative therapy for several hematologic malignancies, and shows promise as a nascent treatment modality for select solid tumors. Although the original goal of alloHCT was hematopoietic reconstitution after sub-lethal chemoradiotherapy, recognition of a profound donor lymphocyte-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) or graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect has shifted the paradigm from pre-transplant cytoreduction to tumor control via donor lymphocytes. In human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible alloHCT, GVL and GVT reactions are induced primarily by donor T-cell recognition of minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAgs). Here we review the literature regarding mHAg-specific T cells in GVL and GVT reactions, and discuss the prospects of exploiting mHAgs as immunotherapeutic targets.

Targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell neoplasm with a median survival of 3 to 5 years. Recent advances have improved patient outlook, but the disease remains incurable. Therefore, continued efforts to develop new therapies that target aberrant signaling pathways are needed. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway regulates apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, and tumor proliferation. This pathway is constitutively activated in multiple myeloma and its inhibition induces apoptosis. Advances in understanding the signaling cascades mediating proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells have markedly improved the treatment of this disease. In this article, we review the role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and the potential therapeutic implications of targeting this pathway in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Efficacy and tolerability of cyclical intravenous pamidronate in patients with low bone mass.

Oral bisphosphonates are an established mode of therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, many patients are unable to take them either because of poor tolerability or some established contraindications. This retrospective study describes our clinical experience with the efficacy and tolerability of cyclical intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Twenty patients received intravenous pamidronate, as a 30-mg infusion administered intravenously over 2 h every 3 mo. All patients were maintained on calcium and vitamin D supplementation: 1000 mg of calcium and 400-800 IU of vitamin D, respectively. Bone mineral densities of the spine and/or hip were measured at baseline and within an average of 14 mo of study entry while on cyclical pamidronate. Two-thirds of patients had a significant increase in bone mineral density either at the lumbar spine or hip. Five patients (25%) developed the expected acute-phase reaction symptoms. Pamidronate constitutes an attractive alternative therapy in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates.